本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

zero-iteration-failure-analysis

Identify and handle agent failures with 0 iterations as pre-execution system issues

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • .skill_id45 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Zero-Iteration Failure Analysis

This skill provides a workflow for detecting and responding to agent failures that occur before any iterations are executed. These failures indicate system-level problems rather than task execution issues.

When to Apply

Use this skill when analyzing agent execution results and you observe:

  • 0 iterations reported in the execution summary
  • No tool invocations in the conversation log
  • No artifacts created (no files, outputs, or intermediate results)
  • Error message present but no agent reasoning visible

Identification Checklist

A zero-iteration failure is confirmed when ALL of the following are true:

[ ] Iteration count = 0
[ ] Tool usage count = 0  
[ ] No conversation log beyond initial instruction
[ ] Error/self-report indicates failure before execution began

Failure Mode Classification

IndicatorFailure TypeInvestigation Level
0 iterations, 0 toolsPre-executionSystem-level
1+ iterations, error mid-taskExecutionAgent-level
1+ iterations, wrong outputReasoningAgent-level

Investigation Steps

Step 1: Confirm Zero-Iteration Status

def is_zero_iteration_failure(execution_result):
    """Check if failure occurred before any agent iterations."""
    return (
        execution_result.get('iterations', 0) == 0 and
        execution_result.get('tool_calls', []) == [] and
        execution_result.get('artifacts', []) == []
    )

Step 2: Extract Error Context

Examine any error message or self-report for clues:

  • Initialization errors: Environment setup, dependency missing, config invalid
  • Prompt parsing errors: Malformed instruction, missing required fields
  • Resource errors: Memory limits, timeout before start, permission denied

Step 3: Route to Appropriate Investigation

IF zero-iteration failure detected:
    → Escalate to SYSTEM investigation
    → Do NOT attempt agent-level debugging
    → Check: environment, dependencies, prompt format, resource limits
ELSE:
    → Proceed with standard agent failure analysis

Step 4: Document the Failure Mode

Record the failure with appropriate categorization:

failure_analysis:
  type: zero-iteration
  severity: high
  investigation_level: system
  agent_debugging_appropriate: false
  recommended_actions:
    - Check execution environment health
    - Verify prompt/input formatting
    - Review system logs for initialization errors
    - Validate resource availability

Common Causes and Resolutions

CauseSymptomsResolution
Environment crashImmediate error, no contextRestart environment, check dependencies
Prompt parse failureError mentions instruction formatValidate input schema, fix formatting
Resource exhaustionTimeout or memory error before startIncrease limits, optimize initialization
Permission deniedAccess error on startupCheck file/system permissions

Escalation Criteria

Immediately flag for system-level review when:

  • Zero-iteration failures occur repeatedly (>2 in same session)
  • Error messages indicate infrastructure issues
  • Multiple agents fail with same zero-iteration pattern

Example Analysis

EXECUTION SUMMARY:
- Iterations: 0
- Tools Used: None
- Artifacts: None
- Status: Failed
- Error: "Agent initialization failed: missing required config"

ANALYSIS:
✓ Zero-iteration failure detected
✓ Pre-execution failure mode confirmed
→ Action: Escalate to system investigation
→ Do NOT debug agent reasoning (no reasoning occurred)
→ Check: config loading, environment variables, initialization sequence

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

❌ Don't attempt to debug agent reasoning when 0 iterations occurred ❌ Don't assume the task instructions were unclear (agent never saw them) ❌ Don't retry with modified prompts before checking system health ❌ Don't categorize as "agent performance issue"

Integration with Failure Tracking

When logging failures, Tag zero-iteration failures distinctly:

{
  "failure_id": "xyz123",
  "failure_mode": "pre_execution",
  "iteration_count": 0,
  "requires_system_review": true,
  "agent_actionable": false
}

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Incremental audio production with duration mismatch handling, adaptive stem extension, and pre-mix alignment verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HKUDS/OpenSpace7,7552026年8月13日 更新

Incremental audio production with duration alignment handling, per-stem verification, and adaptive extension strategies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HKUDS/OpenSpace7,7552026年8月13日 更新

Create serverless API proxy endpoints that hide API keys and provide a unified backend for the dashboard frontend. Designed for Vercel deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HKUDS/OpenSpace7,7552026年8月13日 更新

End-to-end audio production workflow with stems, effects, archiving, and verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HKUDS/OpenSpace7,7552026年8月13日 更新

Handle cascading data retrieval tool failures by falling back to embedded knowledge generation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HKUDS/OpenSpace7,7552026年8月13日 更新

Fallback pattern for executing Python code when execute_code_sandbox fails

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HKUDS/OpenSpace7,7552026年8月13日 更新

HKUDS のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する