本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

codexkit-churn-risk-analyzer

Build customer health scores and churn risk models using leading indicators. Define health dimensions (Usage, Engagement, Support, Sentiment, Contract), weight and score customers, segment into Healthy / At-Risk / Red, and generate intervention playbooks. Use during QBR prep, customer success reviews, or when churn spikes.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml173 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Churn Risk Analyzer

When to Use

  • During monthly or quarterly customer health reviews
  • When churn rate increases and root causes are unclear
  • When building a customer health scoring model for the first time
  • When preparing retention plays for at-risk accounts

Procedure

Step 1 — Define Health Dimensions

DimensionWeightIndicators
Usage30%Login frequency, feature adoption, DAU/MAU ratio
Engagement25%Support ticket sentiment, NPS, event attendance
Support15%Ticket volume, escalations, resolution time
Sentiment15%NPS score, CSAT, qualitative feedback
Contract15%Time to renewal, expansion signals, payment health

Adjust weights by business model (self-serve vs enterprise).

Step 2 — Score Each Dimension

ScoreLevelCriteria
5HealthyStrong usage, positive sentiment, expanding
4GoodRegular usage, neutral/positive feedback
3ModerateDeclining trends, some concerns
2At-RiskSignificant decline, negative signals
1CriticalMinimal engagement, escalations, churn signals

Step 3 — Calculate Health Score

Health Score = Σ (Dimension Score × Weight)

Step 4 — Segment Customers

Health ScoreSegmentAction
4.0–5.0🟢 HealthyExpansion play, referral ask
2.5–3.9🟡 At-RiskProactive outreach, value reinforcement
1.0–2.4🔴 RedExecutive sponsor call, save plan

Step 5 — Intervention Playbooks

🟢 Healthy:

  • Identify expansion opportunities (upsell, cross-sell)
  • Request referral or case study
  • Invite to advisory board or beta programs

🟡 At-Risk:

  • Schedule CSM check-in within 48 hours
  • Re-onboard on underused features
  • Share success stories from similar companies
  • Offer training session or office hours

🔴 Red:

  • Executive sponsor call within 24 hours
  • Create 30-day save plan with specific milestones
  • Offer concessions if justified (credit, extended trial)
  • Prepare for graceful offboarding if save fails

Inputs

InputRequiredFormat
Customer listYesAccount names with contract data
Usage dataYesLogin counts, feature adoption metrics
Support dataRecommendedTicket count, CSAT, escalations
NPS/sentiment dataRecommendedScores or qualitative feedback
Contract detailsRecommendedRenewal dates, ARR, payment status

Output

## Churn Risk Report — [Period]

### Portfolio Health Summary

| Segment | Count | % of Base | ARR at Risk |
|---------|-------|-----------|-------------|
| 🟢 Healthy | 120 | 60% | — |
| 🟡 At-Risk | 55 | 27.5% | $820K |
| 🔴 Red | 25 | 12.5% | $450K |

### Top 10 At-Risk Accounts

| Account | Health Score | Top Risk Factor | ARR | Renewal | CSM Action |
|---------|-------------|-----------------|-----|---------|------------|
| Acme Corp | 2.8 | Usage ↓ 40% | $120K | 60 days | Re-onboarding |
| Beta Inc | 2.5 | NPS dropped to 4 | $85K | 90 days | Exec call |
| [etc.] | | | | | |

### Intervention Queue

| Priority | Account | Action | Owner | Deadline |
|----------|---------|--------|-------|----------|
| 1 | Acme Corp | Schedule exec sponsor call | VP CS | This week |
| 2 | Beta Inc | Feature re-onboarding | CSM | Next week |

### Churn Risk Drivers (Pareto)
1. Usage decline (40% of at-risk accounts)
2. Support escalation unresolved (25%)
3. Champion left the company (20%)
4. Contract/pricing dissatisfaction (15%)

Definition of Done

  • Health dimensions defined with weights
  • Each customer scored per dimension
  • Weighted health score calculated
  • Customers segmented into 🟢/🟡/🔴
  • Intervention playbook per segment
  • Top at-risk accounts listed with actions and owners
  • Churn risk drivers identified (Pareto)

Examples

Prompt

We have 200 B2B customers. Churn rate spiked from 5% to 8% this quarter.
Here is our customer data: [paste usage, support, NPS data]
Build a churn risk model with health scores, segment our portfolio,
and create intervention playbooks for at-risk accounts.

Quality Criteria

  • Data sources and assumptions are explicitly stated
  • Calculations are reproducible from provided inputs
  • Visualizations or tables have clear labels, units, and time ranges
  • Caveats and confidence levels are documented for estimates

Verification (4C)

CheckQuestion
CorrectnessAre formulas, aggregations, and statistical methods applied correctly?
CompletenessDoes the analysis cover all requested metrics and time ranges?
Context-fitAre the chosen metrics relevant to the business question being answered?
ConsequenceIf this data were used for a decision today, what blind spots remain?

Edge Cases

  • Missing or incomplete data — Document gaps and their potential impact on conclusions. Provide ranges instead of point estimates.
  • Outliers skewing results — Report with and without outliers. Document the decision to include or exclude.
  • Changing data definitions mid-period — Split analysis at the change boundary and note the schema difference.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

hoavdc のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する