本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

codexkit-executive-brief-writer

Write one-page executive briefs and decision memos that turn messy inputs into a concise recommendation, options, risks, decision ask, and next steps. Use when leaders need a fast read before approving budget, policy, vendor, headcount, or strategy changes. Do not use for long-form reports, slide design, or generic summarization without a decision.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml184 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Executive Brief Writer

Purpose

Produce a short, decision-oriented brief that respects executive attention and surfaces the real choice.

When to use

  • A leader needs a one-page read before making a call.
  • A team must compare options and recommend one path.
  • A complex issue needs a short decision memo instead of a long report.

When not to use

  • The task is only to summarize text with no recommendation.
  • The audience needs a detailed technical appendix instead of an executive brief.

Inputs

  • business question or decision to make
  • context, evidence, and constraints
  • options considered and current recommendation
  • known risks, tradeoffs, and deadline
  • intended audience and tone

Procedure

  1. State the decision question in one sentence.
  2. Distill the situation and why it matters now.
  3. Compare the real options, including the cost of doing nothing.
  4. Make one recommendation and support it with evidence.
  5. Surface the top risks, assumptions, and required decisions.
  6. End with clear next steps, owners, and timing.

Output

  • headline and decision ask
  • situation summary
  • options with tradeoffs
  • recommended path
  • key risks and assumptions
  • next steps and owners

Definition of done

  • The brief can be read in under five minutes.
  • A leader can tell what decision is being requested.
  • Tradeoffs and risks are explicit, not hidden in narrative.

Examples

  • "Write an executive memo for approving a new vendor contract versus building internally."
  • "Turn this messy project update into a one-page decision brief for the COO."

Quality Criteria

  • All claims reference specific frameworks, standards, or quantifiable data
  • Content matches the stated audience's expertise level
  • Recommendations are actionable — each includes a concrete next step
  • No unsupported assertions or generic filler language

Verification (4C)

CheckQuestion
CorrectnessDo referenced frameworks and standards match their official definitions?
CompletenessAre all key concepts covered without significant gaps for the stated audience?
Context-fitWould this be useful for someone new to this domain, or is it too advanced/too basic?
ConsequenceIf a stakeholder acted on this immediately, what could they misinterpret?

Edge Cases

  • Conflicting frameworks — State which framework takes precedence and why. Document the trade-off explicitly.
  • Rapidly changing domain — Note information currency date. Flag sections likely to need updates.
  • Audience has mixed expertise levels — Provide a glossary and mark advanced sections as optional.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

hoavdc のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する