本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

codexkit-procurement-rfp-writer

Write structured Requests for Proposal (RFP) or Requests for Quotation (RFQ) aligned with ISO 20400 sustainable procurement principles. Cover scope, technical requirements, evaluation methodology, and commercial terms. Use when sourcing vendors, services, or equipment.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml176 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Procurement RFP Writer

When to Use

  • When sourcing new vendors, services, or equipment
  • When competitive bidding is required by policy
  • When replacing an incumbent supplier
  • When standardizing procurement documentation

Procedure

Step 1 — Define Scope

  1. Background and context for the procurement
  2. Objectives and desired outcomes
  3. Scope of work or supply (in/out of scope)
  4. Contract duration and renewal options
  5. Budget range (if disclosed)

Step 2 — Technical Requirements

  1. Mandatory requirements (must-have)
  2. Desirable requirements (nice-to-have)
  3. Technical specifications or standards
  4. Integration requirements with existing systems
  5. SLA expectations (uptime, response time, quality)

Step 3 — Commercial Terms

  1. Pricing model: fixed, T&M, unit-based, subscription
  2. Payment terms and milestones
  3. Warranty and liability provisions
  4. Insurance requirements
  5. Termination and exit provisions

Step 4 — Evaluation Methodology

CriterionWeightScoring
Technical capability35%Scored 1–5 per requirement
Price/commercial30%Lowest-price or best-value formula
Experience/references15%Past performance, case studies
Sustainability/ESG10%Environmental and social criteria
Implementation plan10%Timeline, resources, risk mitigation

Step 5 — Submission Instructions

  1. Submission deadline and format
  2. Questions and clarifications process
  3. Contact person and communication rules
  4. Presentation/demo requirements (if any)
  5. Confidentiality and non-disclosure requirements

Inputs

InputRequiredFormat
Requirements specificationYesDetailed scope document
Budget rangeRecommendedCurrency range
Evaluation criteria and weightsRecommendedMatrix
TimelineYesKey dates

Output

## Request for Proposal — [Title]

### 1. Introduction
[Company] invites proposals for [scope] to support [objective].
Contract period: [duration] with [renewal] option.

### 2. Scope of Work
#### In Scope
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]
#### Out of Scope
- [Item A]

### 3. Technical Requirements
#### Mandatory (M) / Desirable (D)

| # | Requirement | M/D | Response |
|---|-------------|-----|----------|
| 1 | [Requirement] | M | |
| 2 | [Requirement] | M | |
| 3 | [Requirement] | D | |

### 4. Commercial Proposal
Please provide pricing in the following format:
| Item | Unit | Qty | Unit Price | Total |
|------|------|-----|-----------|-------|
| | | | | |

### 5. Evaluation Criteria
| Criterion | Weight |
|-----------|--------|
| Technical capability | 35% |
| Commercial | 30% |
| Experience | 15% |
| Sustainability | 10% |
| Implementation | 10% |

### 6. Timeline
| Milestone | Date |
|-----------|------|
| RFP issued | [Date] |
| Q&A deadline | [Date] |
| Submission deadline | [Date] |
| Evaluation | [Date range] |
| Award notification | [Date] |

### 7. Submission Instructions
- Format: PDF, max [X] pages
- Email to: [contact]
- Subject line: "RFP Response — [Title]"

Definition of Done

  • Clear scope with in/out boundaries
  • Requirements classified as mandatory/desirable
  • Evaluation methodology with weighted criteria
  • Commercial terms and pricing template
  • Timeline with all key dates
  • Submission instructions complete

Examples

Prompt

We need to source a new CRM system for 200 users.
Budget: $50K–$80K annual. Contract: 3 years.
Key requirements: Salesforce or HubSpot tier, API integration, GDPR compliance.
Write a complete RFP document.

Quality Criteria

  • All placeholder sections are filled with domain-specific content
  • Structure follows the relevant industry standard or framework
  • Language matches target audience (technical / executive / legal)
  • Output is ready for review — not a rough draft requiring major rework

Verification (4C)

CheckQuestion
CorrectnessDoes the draft structure follow the stated framework or industry standard?
CompletenessAre all required sections present with substantive (not placeholder) content?
Context-fitDoes tone, detail level, and terminology match the intended audience?
ConsequenceIf sent to the intended recipient without further editing, what would fail?

Edge Cases

  • No existing template for this type — Use the closest available template and document all customizations made.
  • Stakeholder requirements conflict — Flag conflicts explicitly in the draft. Do not silently choose one requirement over another.
  • Output required in multiple formats — Produce the canonical format first, then derive others. Note any formatting limitations.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月11日 更新

hoavdc のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する