Conduct strategic analysis using Porter's Five Forces, PESTEL, and SWOT frameworks. Assess competitive dynamics, macro environment, and internal capabilities. Synthesize into strategic implications with ranked options. Use when entering new markets, evaluating competitive position, or strategic planning.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Rate each force (1 = Low, 5 = High):
| Force | Guiding Questions |
|---|---|
| Threat of New Entrants | Barriers to entry? Capital requirements? Regulatory hurdles? |
| Bargaining Power of Suppliers | Supplier concentration? Switching costs? Unique inputs? |
| Bargaining Power of Buyers | Buyer concentration? Price sensitivity? Switching costs? |
| Threat of Substitutes | Alternative solutions? Performance ratio? Switching ease? |
| Competitive Rivalry | Number of competitors? Industry growth? Exit barriers? |
Overall industry attractiveness: Average of 5 forces (inverted — lower score = more attractive).
| Factor | Key Trends | Impact (H/M/L) | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Political | Regulation, trade policy, political stability | ||
| Economic | GDP growth, inflation, exchange rates, interest rates | ||
| Social | Demographics, consumer behavior, workforce trends | ||
| Technological | Innovation pace, automation, digital disruption | ||
| Environmental | Sustainability pressure, resource scarcity, climate | ||
| Legal | Compliance requirements, IP law, labor law |
Combine Five Forces (external) + PESTEL (macro) + internal assessment:
| Helpful | Harmful | |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | Strengths | Weaknesses |
| External | Opportunities | Threats |
Generate strategic options by crossing:
Rank options by: Feasibility × Impact × Alignment with vision.
| Input | Required | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Industry/market context | Yes | Description or brief |
| Company position | Yes | Products, market share, capabilities |
| Competitor list | Recommended | Key competitors with known strengths |
## Strategic Analysis — [Company/Market]
### Five Forces Assessment
| Force | Rating | Rationale |
|-------|--------|-----------|
| New Entrants | 2/5 | High capital requirements, regulatory barriers |
| Supplier Power | 3/5 | Moderate concentration, some switching costs |
| Buyer Power | 4/5 | Price-sensitive market, low switching costs |
| Substitutes | 3/5 | Digital alternatives emerging |
| Rivalry | 4/5 | 5 major competitors, slow growth |
| **Industry Attractiveness** | **Moderate** (avg 3.2/5) | |
### PESTEL Summary
[Top 3–5 macro trends with impact assessment]
### SWOT Matrix
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|-----------|------------|
| Strong brand | Limited digital capability |
| | |
| **Opportunities** | **Threats** |
| Emerging market expansion | New digital entrant |
### Strategic Options (Ranked)
| # | Strategy | Type | Feasibility | Impact | Rank |
|---|----------|------|-------------|--------|------|
| 1 | Digital transformation | Reorientation | High | High | ⭐ 1 |
| 2 | Market expansion APAC | Offensive | Medium | High | 2 |
| 3 | Cost leadership program | Defensive | High | Medium | 3 |
### Recommendation
[2–3 sentence strategic recommendation with rationale]
Analyze the competitive landscape for our B2B SaaS company in the HR tech market.
We have 5% market share, strong product but weak sales team.
Key competitors: Workday, BambooHR, Deel.
Use Porter's Five Forces + PESTEL + SWOT and recommend strategic options.
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Do referenced frameworks and standards match their official definitions? |
| Completeness | Are all key concepts covered without significant gaps for the stated audience? |
| Context-fit | Would this be useful for someone new to this domain, or is it too advanced/too basic? |
| Consequence | If a stakeholder acted on this immediately, what could they misinterpret? |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。