本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

codexkit-survey-analyzer

Analyze survey and feedback data with statistical distributions, cross-tabulations, significance testing, and open-ended theme extraction. Produces executive-ready survey reports with segment comparisons and action recommendations. Use when processing NPS, CSAT, employee engagement, or market research surveys.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml166 B
  • examples/common-mistakes.md849 B
  • examples/good-output.md837 B
  • verification/checklist.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Survey Analyzer

When to Use

  • After collecting NPS, CSAT, or employee engagement survey responses
  • When analyzing market research or customer feedback data
  • When leadership needs actionable insights from survey results
  • When comparing satisfaction across segments (regions, teams, products)

Procedure

Step 1 — Data Overview

Summarize the survey:

  • Total responses vs invitations sent → response rate
  • Collection period
  • Question types: Likert scale, multiple choice, ranking, open-ended
  • Known biases: self-selection, non-response, recency

Step 2 — Quantitative Analysis

For each closed-ended question:

QuestionNMeanMedianStd DevDistribution Shape
[Q1 text][n][mean][median][sd]Normal / Skewed L / Skewed R / Bimodal

Calculate key indices:

  • NPS: % Promoters (9–10) − % Detractors (0–6)
  • CSAT: % Satisfied (4–5 on 5-point scale)
  • Engagement: Overall index from engagement battery

Step 3 — Segment Comparison

Cross-tabulate by key segments:

SegmentNScorevs OverallSignificant?
Region A12072+4Yes (p<0.05)
Region B9565−3No (p=0.12)

Test significance:

  • Chi-square for categorical × categorical
  • t-test or ANOVA for continuous × categorical
  • Flag small samples (<30) as unreliable

Step 4 — Open-Ended Theme Extraction

For free-text responses:

  1. Code responses into themes (max 8–10 themes)
  2. Count frequency of each theme
  3. Identify sentiment per theme (positive / neutral / negative)
ThemeFrequency% of ResponsesSentimentExample Quote
Onboarding speed4518%Negative"Took 3 weeks to get access"

Step 5 — Insight Synthesis

Structure insights as:

  • What: the finding (data-driven)
  • So What: why it matters (impact)
  • Now What: recommended action

Step 6 — Action Recommendations

PriorityInsightActionOwnerTimeline
1NPS dropped 8 pts in segment XInvestigate root causeCX Lead2 weeks

Inputs

InputRequiredFormat
Survey responsesYesCSV, spreadsheet, or summary tables
Question listYesQuestions with response types
SegmentsRecommendedHow to slice the data
Previous resultsRecommendedFor trend comparison

Output

## Survey Analysis — [Survey Name]

### Overview
- **Period:** Q1 2024 | **Responses:** 532 / 1,200 (44% response rate)
- **NPS:** +32 (↓4 from Q4) | **CSAT:** 78% (stable)

### Key Findings
1. **Onboarding satisfaction dropped 12 points** — driven by Region B
   - Root cause: New system rollout created delays
   - Action: Expedite training for Region B ops team

2. **Support quality is the #1 driver of promoter scores**
   - Correlation: 0.72 between support rating and NPS
   - Action: Protect support team headcount in budget cycle

### Segment Comparison
[Cross-tabulation table]

### Open-Ended Themes
[Theme frequency table with example quotes]

### Recommended Actions
[Prioritized action table with owners]

Definition of Done

  • Response rate calculated and bias noted
  • All quantitative questions summarized with distributions
  • Segment comparisons with significance testing
  • Open-ended themes extracted and quantified
  • What / So What / Now What insights provided
  • Action recommendations prioritized with owners

Quality Criteria

  • Data sources and assumptions are explicitly stated
  • Calculations are reproducible from provided inputs
  • Visualizations or tables have clear labels, units, and time ranges
  • Caveats and confidence levels are documented for estimates

Verification (4C)

CheckQuestion
CorrectnessAre formulas, aggregations, and statistical methods applied correctly?
CompletenessDoes the analysis cover all requested metrics and time ranges?
Context-fitAre the chosen metrics relevant to the business question being answered?
ConsequenceIf this data were used for a decision today, what blind spots remain?

Edge Cases

  • Missing or incomplete data — Document gaps and their potential impact on conclusions. Provide ranges instead of point estimates.
  • Outliers skewing results — Report with and without outliers. Document the decision to include or exclude.
  • Changing data definitions mid-period — Split analysis at the change boundary and note the schema difference.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hoavdc/CodexKit252026年10月8日 更新

hoavdc のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する