本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

python-patterns

Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Python Patterns

Python development principles and decision-making for 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize patterns.

When to Use

Use this skill when making Python architecture decisions, choosing frameworks, designing async patterns, or structuring Python projects.


⚠️ How to Use This Skill

This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.

  • ASK user for framework preference when unclear
  • Choose async vs sync based on CONTEXT
  • Don't default to same framework every time

1. Framework Selection (2025)

Decision Tree

What are you building?
│
├── API-first / Microservices
│   └── FastAPI (async, modern, fast)
│
├── Full-stack web / CMS / Admin
│   └── Django (batteries-included)
│
├── Simple / Script / Learning
│   └── Flask (minimal, flexible)
│
├── AI/ML API serving
│   └── FastAPI (Pydantic, async, uvicorn)
│
└── Background workers
    └── Celery + any framework

Comparison Principles

FactorFastAPIDjangoFlask
Best forAPIs, microservicesFull-stack, CMSSimple, learning
AsyncNativeDjango 5.0+Via extensions
AdminManualBuilt-inVia extensions
ORMChoose your ownDjango ORMChoose your own
Learning curveLowMediumLow

Selection Questions to Ask:

  1. Is this API-only or full-stack?
  2. Need admin interface?
  3. Team familiar with async?
  4. Existing infrastructure?

2. Async vs Sync Decision

When to Use Async

async def is better when:
├── I/O-bound operations (database, HTTP, file)
├── Many concurrent connections
├── Real-time features
├── Microservices communication
└── FastAPI/Starlette/Django ASGI

def (sync) is better when:
├── CPU-bound operations
├── Simple scripts
├── Legacy codebase
├── Team unfamiliar with async
└── Blocking libraries (no async version)

The Golden Rule

I/O-bound → async (waiting for external)
CPU-bound → sync + multiprocessing (computing)

Don't:
├── Mix sync and async carelessly
├── Use sync libraries in async code
└── Force async for CPU work

Async Library Selection

NeedAsync Library
HTTP clienthttpx
PostgreSQLasyncpg
Redisaioredis / redis-py async
File I/Oaiofiles
Database ORMSQLAlchemy 2.0 async, Tortoise

3. Type Hints Strategy

When to Type

Always type:
├── Function parameters
├── Return types
├── Class attributes
├── Public APIs

Can skip:
├── Local variables (let inference work)
├── One-off scripts
├── Tests (usually)

Common Type Patterns

# These are patterns, understand them:

# Optional → might be None
from typing import Optional
def find_user(id: int) -> Optional[User]: ...

# Union → one of multiple types
def process(data: str | dict) -> None: ...

# Generic collections
def get_items() -> list[Item]: ...
def get_mapping() -> dict[str, int]: ...

# Callable
from typing import Callable
def apply(fn: Callable[[int], str]) -> str: ...

Pydantic for Validation

When to use Pydantic:
├── API request/response models
├── Configuration/settings
├── Data validation
├── Serialization

Benefits:
├── Runtime validation
├── Auto-generated JSON schema
├── Works with FastAPI natively
└── Clear error messages

4. Project Structure Principles

Structure Selection

Small project / Script:
├── main.py
├── utils.py
└── requirements.txt

Medium API:
├── app/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
│   ├── models/
│   ├── routes/
│   ├── services/
│   └── schemas/
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml

Large application:
├── src/
│   └── myapp/
│       ├── core/
│       ├── api/
│       ├── services/
│       ├── models/
│       └── ...
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml

FastAPI Structure Principles

Organize by feature or layer:

By layer:
├── routes/ (API endpoints)
├── services/ (business logic)
├── models/ (database models)
├── schemas/ (Pydantic models)
└── dependencies/ (shared deps)

By feature:
├── users/
│   ├── routes.py
│   ├── service.py
│   └── schemas.py
└── products/
    └── ...

5. Django Principles (2025)

Django Async (Django 5.0+)

Django supports async:
├── Async views
├── Async middleware
├── Async ORM (limited)
└── ASGI deployment

When to use async in Django:
├── External API calls
├── WebSocket (Channels)
├── High-concurrency views
└── Background task triggering

Django Best Practices

Model design:
├── Fat models, thin views
├── Use managers for common queries
├── Abstract base classes for shared fields

Views:
├── Class-based for complex CRUD
├── Function-based for simple endpoints
├── Use viewsets with DRF

Queries:
├── select_related() for FKs
├── prefetch_related() for M2M
├── Avoid N+1 queries
└── Use .only() for specific fields

6. FastAPI Principles

async def vs def in FastAPI

Use async def when:
├── Using async database drivers
├── Making async HTTP calls
├── I/O-bound operations
└── Want to handle concurrency

Use def when:
├── Blocking operations
├── Sync database drivers
├── CPU-bound work
└── FastAPI runs in threadpool automatically

Dependency Injection

Use dependencies for:
├── Database sessions
├── Current user / Auth
├── Configuration
├── Shared resources

Benefits:
├── Testability (mock dependencies)
├── Clean separation
├── Automatic cleanup (yield)

Pydantic v2 Integration

# FastAPI + Pydantic are tightly integrated:

# Request validation
@app.post("/users")
async def create(user: UserCreate) -> UserResponse:
    # user is already validated
    ...

# Response serialization
# Return type becomes response schema

7. Background Tasks

Selection Guide

SolutionBest For
BackgroundTasksSimple, in-process tasks
CeleryDistributed, complex workflows
ARQAsync, Redis-based
RQSimple Redis queue
DramatiqActor-based, simpler than Celery

When to Use Each

FastAPI BackgroundTasks:
├── Quick operations
├── No persistence needed
├── Fire-and-forget
└── Same process

Celery/ARQ:
├── Long-running tasks
├── Need retry logic
├── Distributed workers
├── Persistent queue
└── Complex workflows

8. Error Handling Principles

Exception Strategy

In FastAPI:
├── Create custom exception classes
├── Register exception handlers
├── Return consistent error format
└── Log without exposing internals

Pattern:
├── Raise domain exceptions in services
├── Catch and transform in handlers
└── Client gets clean error response

Error Response Philosophy

Include:
├── Error code (programmatic)
├── Message (human readable)
├── Details (field-level when applicable)
└── NOT stack traces (security)

9. Testing Principles

Testing Strategy

TypePurposeTools
UnitBusiness logicpytest
IntegrationAPI endpointspytest + httpx/TestClient
E2EFull workflowspytest + DB

Async Testing

# Use pytest-asyncio for async tests

import pytest
from httpx import AsyncClient

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_endpoint():
    async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client:
        response = await client.get("/users")
        assert response.status_code == 200

Fixtures Strategy

Common fixtures:
├── db_session → Database connection
├── client → Test client
├── authenticated_user → User with token
└── sample_data → Test data setup

10. Decision Checklist

Before implementing:

  • Asked user about framework preference?
  • Chosen framework for THIS context? (not just default)
  • Decided async vs sync?
  • Planned type hint strategy?
  • Defined project structure?
  • Planned error handling?
  • Considered background tasks?

11. Anti-Patterns to Avoid

❌ DON'T:

  • Default to Django for simple APIs (FastAPI may be better)
  • Use sync libraries in async code
  • Skip type hints for public APIs
  • Put business logic in routes/views
  • Ignore N+1 queries
  • Mix async and sync carelessly

✅ DO:

  • Choose framework based on context
  • Ask about async requirements
  • Use Pydantic for validation
  • Separate concerns (routes → services → repos)
  • Test critical paths

Remember: Python patterns are about decision-making for YOUR specific context. Don't copy code—think about what serves your application best.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when manage multiple local CLI agents via tmux sessions (start/stop/monitor/assign) with cron-friendly scheduling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月8日 更新

Use when a hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月8日 更新

Reference for how BDB structures autonomous software engineering work — the seven-node dispatcher graph (Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, Shipping) that /startcycle-graph actually runs. Use when you need the high-level lifecycle framing without inventing your own process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月8日 更新

Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月8日 更新

Harness patterns for coding agents — memory, permissions, context engineering, delegation, skills, hooks, bootstrap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月8日 更新

Live map of a multi-agent build in the browser: which plan component is being worked on, by which agent or harness, what is done and what is stuck. Use when a multi-agent pipeline starts (/startcycle, /startcycle-graph, /teamwork-preview) or after a plan-canvas approve, or when the user asks to see what the agents are doing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月8日 更新

hybridlabor-api のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する