本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

release

Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release", "cut a release", "ship a new version", or "bump and publish" brooks-lint. Do NOT trigger for: propagating an already-decided version without releasing (use `npm run bump` directly), CHANGELOG edits alone, or questions about the release process that don't ask to perform it.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

brooks-lint — Release

Target version comes from $ARGUMENTS (e.g. 1.4.0). If empty, ask the maintainer for the semver bump before doing anything.

Before accepting that version, read the backlog. Run npm run changelog:audit and look at what is actually unreleased — the bump is decided by the whole range, not by the change that prompted the release. If the range contains a feature or a new platform and the maintainer asked for a patch, stop and say so: v1.5.1 was published, then deleted and re-cut as v1.6.0 because twenty unreleased commits (including a new platform) had been swept into a patch.

Execute these steps in order. bump-version.mjs reads the version FROM package.json and does NOT touch the changelog — so the version edit and the CHANGELOG entry are manual; the script only fans the version out to the manifests and every version-bearing text file.

  1. Set the source of truth. npm version <version> --no-git-tag-version (the --no-git-tag-version flag is required — plain npm version would create its own commit + tag and collide with the manual commit in step 5).

  2. Propagate. npm run bump — writes the version into .claude-plugin/plugin.json, .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, .codex-plugin/plugin.json, gemini-extension.json, and every version-bearing text file discovered by scripts/version-refs.mjs (all six README badges plus the JSON-LD softwareVersion on the docs landing page). Do not maintain a list here — the script's is authoritative.

  3. Write the changelog. Add a new section at the top of CHANGELOG.md with categorized notes (Added / Fixed / Changed) summarizing the commits since the last release tag. The heading MUST be ## [<version>] - YYYY-MM-DD — npm run validate parses that exact shape and fails on a bare ## <version>. 3a. Audit the range — every commit, no sampling. Run:

    npm run changelog:audit
    

    It derives the range from the last release tag, applies the only three exemptions (the release bump, a merge commit whose branch commits are listed separately, and the star-history refresh — a bot commit touching only the chart's own two files) and prints the rest as a checklist. Walk it: each line gets an entry you just wrote, or a reason it needs none. Nothing else is exempt — internal hardening with no user-visible change earns an entry, and so does an outside contributor's maintainer-facing fix, which also earns an @handle credit. A Changelog: trailer on a commit is surfaced as a flag; that commit's entry is the one you are writing now.

    The script exits non-zero on the gap it can prove — a pull request in the range whose #N the section never cites. That same check runs inside npm run validate while a release is in progress, so it cannot be skipped, and validate prints one line whenever it stands down. The rest of the checklist is judgment and is not enforced. A green audit is not proof of a complete changelog: a bare #N anywhere in the section clears the gate, a rebase-merged PR leaves nothing to match, and anything staged into the release bump itself is never audited. See CLAUDE.md's Release Process.

  4. Validate. npm run validate — fails if any manifest, any version-bearing text file, or the CHANGELOG entry is out of sync. Fix and re-run until clean. Then npm test.

  5. Commit & push. Stage everything npm run bump rewrote plus CHANGELOG.md — read git status rather than naming files, because the version-bearing set is discovered from disk and is more than one README; commit with a conventional message (chore(release): bump version to <version>); push to main (direct-to-main repo — no PR).

  6. Tag & publish. Create the GitHub release: gh release create v<version> --title "v<version>" --notes "<changelog section>".

Report the released version and the GitHub release URL when done.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hyhmrright/brooks-lint1,5142026年10月5日 更新

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hyhmrright/brooks-lint1,5142026年10月5日 更新

Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hyhmrright/brooks-lint1,5142026年10月5日 更新

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hyhmrright/brooks-lint1,5142026年10月5日 更新

PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hyhmrright/brooks-lint1,5142026年10月5日 更新

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hyhmrright/brooks-lint1,5142026年10月5日 更新

hyhmrright のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する