本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

software-lifecycle

How to work in a Software Lifecycle project (the `software-lifecycle` starter pack): proposals → decisions → specs → postmortems, plus guides. Read when the project has these folders, or when asked how this project is organized. Carries the doc lifecycle, status flows, and per-folder agent behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. The five workflows — frame a proposal, write a spec, record a decision, write a postmortem, review a design — each ship as their own sibling skill in this pack. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(7)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • frame-a-proposal/SKILL.md14.0 KB
  • plugin.json346 B
  • record-a-decision/SKILL.md13.9 KB
  • review-a-design/SKILL.md14.4 KB
  • write-a-postmortem/SKILL.md17.4 KB
  • write-a-spec/SKILL.md19.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Software Lifecycle pack — how to work here

This project holds the doc lifecycle for an engineering team or OSS project. The flow is proposals → decisions → specs → postmortems, with guides as the how-to bucket. This skill holds the workflow so templates and folder descriptions stay clean.

This skill is pack guidance. The platform /open-knowledge skill (read/write/preview/linking/grounding rules) still governs every markdown operation — this layers the lifecycle conventions on top.

The flow

proposals/    in-flight RFC-shape design proposals
   ↓ accepted
decisions/    frozen ADRs (the record of what was decided)
   ↓ derived
specs/        implementation specs for accepted proposals
   ↓ when things break
postmortems/  blameless incident write-ups
guides/       how-to / onboarding / runbooks (referenced throughout)

Per-folder rules + agent behaviors

proposals/ — One file per proposal (0001-feature-name.md). Status flows draft → fcp → accepted/rejected. An accepted proposal graduates to a record in decisions/. Shape: Motivation / Design / Drawbacks / Alternatives / Unresolved questions. Agent: when a proposal sits at status: draft more than 14 days, surface it for the author to advance, park, or close.

decisions/ — Architecture Decision Records (MADR / Nygard shape). Frozen once accepted. One file per decision (NNNN-title.md); status proposed/accepted/deprecated/superseded. A new decision that supersedes an older one links back via Supersedes:. Agent: on a new decision, scan existing records touching the same subsystem and surface Supersedes: candidates before commit.

specs/ — Implementation specs derived from accepted proposals. Prefer the github/spec-kit shape: one folder per spec (specs/NNN-name/) with spec.md + plan.md + tasks.md (the pack ships all three templates). References the parent proposal. Agent: when a spec moves to status: shipped, suggest a postmortem template if the owner reports an incident in the spec's subsystem.

postmortems/ — Blameless incident write-ups, one file per incident (YYYY-MM-DD-name.md): Summary / Timeline / Root cause / What went well / Action items (Google SRE shape). Agent: surface a Related: block linking prior postmortems that share subsystems.

guides/ — How-to guides, onboarding docs, and service-bound runbooks (Diátaxis how-to). Ships guide, onboarding-guide, and runbook templates. Carries last_verified so stale guides surface in periodic reviews. Agent: when a postmortem is published, scan its action items for guide-shaped follow-ups and stub a guide pre-filled with the symptom and timeline excerpt.

The five workflows

Authoring in this project is procedural, not conventional. Each workflow ships as its own skill so it loads only when the work calls for it — reach for the one that matches the task rather than writing into a folder from scratch.

WorkflowSibling skillWhen
Frame a proposal/frame-a-proposalA change needs designing and arguing before anyone builds it.
Write a spec/write-a-specAn accepted proposal needs scoping into an implementable spec.
Record a decision/record-a-decisionA decision was actually made and needs its context and consequences preserved.
Write a postmortem/write-a-postmortemAn incident happened and the team needs a blameless write-up.
Review a design/review-a-designAn existing proposal, spec, or decision needs pressure-testing for soundness.

Templates

Create docs with write({ document: { path, template: "<name>" } }). Templates carry only structure (headings + frontmatter scaffold); what each section is for is described above, not repeated in the document body.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

How to work in a Codebase Wiki project (the `codebase-wiki` starter pack): an agent-authored, source-grounded wiki of the surrounding codebase. Read when the project has a `wiki/` knowledge base with `architecture/`, `modules/`, `flows/`, `concepts/`, and `guides/` sections plus `wiki/OVERVIEW.md`, or when asked to generate or refresh a wiki of this codebase. Carries the per-folder rules and freshness + log discipline, summarizes the audience/depth knobs and source-reference convention, and bundles the full generate/refresh procedure in `references/`. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5232026年10月10日 更新

Promote existing research into a stable-status canonical article under `articles/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when a decision has actually been made and the team wants the source-of-truth written down, or when asked to consolidate, canonicalize, promote research, or supersede an older article. Carries the decision-confirmation gate, the `supersedes:` chain that keeps the evidence trail intact, and the canonical voice. Does not conduct new research — that is the sibling `research-with-sources` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5232026年10月10日 更新

Frame a new design proposal (RFC-shape) under proposals/ — problem before solution, named beneficiary and observable change, real alternatives, honest drawbacks, and a live open-questions backlog. Read when asked to frame a proposal, write an RFC, propose a design, pitch a change, draft a PRD-style design doc, or open a design proposal for review. Do NOT read to record a decision after it is accepted (use record-a-decision), to write an implementation spec (use write-a-spec), to write a postmortem (use write-a-postmortem), or to review or critique an existing design (use review-a-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5232026年10月10日 更新

How to work in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when the project has the three-layer source-grounded layout — `external-sources/` → `research/` → `articles/` — or when asked how this project is organized. Carries the layer model, per-folder rules, status flows, and log discipline so this guidance does NOT live inside template bodies or log.md. The three procedures live elsewhere: ingest in the platform `open-knowledge` skill, research and consolidate as their own sibling skills in this pack. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5232026年10月10日 更新

How to work in a Plain Notes project (the `plain-notes` starter pack): a flat notes/ folder plus a daily/ journal. The 'I just want to write' layout. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to jot a note, capture a quick thought, or write today's journal entry. Carries the linking habit and daily-entry behavior so templates and folder descriptions stay minimal. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5232026年10月10日 更新

Open Knowledge Format (OKF) v0.2 guidance. Use when creating, reading, reviewing, or maintaining an OKF bundle; responding to OpenKnowledge `okf` plugin warnings; or choosing types, provenance, links, indexes, or logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5232026年10月10日 更新

inkeep のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する