popV Multi-Method Cell Type Transfer

Overview

popV (Population Voting for single-cell annotation) annotates a query scRNA-seq dataset by running 10+ independent classification algorithms against a labeled reference atlas and aggregating results via majority voting. Each method produces its own label; the final popv_prediction is the consensus across all methods, and the popv_agreement score quantifies how many methods agree. This ensemble strategy is robust to individual method failures on unusual datasets and provides a principled uncertainty estimate: low agreement highlights novel cell states or annotation gaps.

When to Use

• Annotating a query dataset by transferring labels from a well-curated reference atlas when you want a consensus rather than a single model's judgment
• Identifying novel or ambiguous cell states as cells where methods disagree (low popv_agreement score)
• Benchmarking annotation reliability by comparing per-method labels to detect systematic disagreements
• Annotating large atlas datasets (>100k cells) where batch effects between reference and query are substantial
• Producing annotation for downstream analyses that require high-confidence labels (clinical data, regulatory submissions)
• Use omics-plotting SKILL for confidence bar charts and method-agreement heatmaps from exported tables (UMAPs stay in scanpy sc.pl.*)
• Use CellTypist (celltypist-cell-annotation) instead when speed matters and a pre-trained model matches your tissue; popV is slower because it trains multiple models on your reference
• Use scANVI (scvi-tools-single-cell) instead when you need a single probabilistic deep generative model with formal uncertainty quantification and do not require the ensemble

Prerequisites

• Python packages: popv>=0.6, scanpy>=1.9, anndata, scvi-tools>=1.0, harmonypy, bbknn, celltypist
• Data requirements: Two AnnData objects — a labeled reference (adata_ref) with cell type labels in obs, and an unlabeled query (adata_query). Both must be from the same species and have overlapping gene sets. Raw counts in adata.X (popV applies its own normalization internally)
• Environment: Python 3.9+; GPU recommended for scVI/SCANVI methods (falls back to CPU); 32 GB RAM recommended for >200k reference cells

pip install popv scvi-tools harmonypy bbknn celltypist

Pre-flight Interview

Settle these with the user before writing any analysis code.

decisions:
  - id: D1
    param: annotationStrategy
    kind: required
    source: user
    ask: "Name cell types from canonical markers by hand over the clusters, transfer them from an annotated reference by ensemble consensus, or do both and compare the two?"
    default: "ensemble transfer, then confirm against markers"

  - id: D2
    param: tissueContext
    kind: required
    source: user
    ask: "Which tissue is this, and in what state - healthy adult, fetal or developmental, diseased, or perturbed?"
    default: null

  - id: D3
    param: referenceAtlas
    kind: required
    source: literature
    depends_on: [D2]
    ask: "Which annotated reference matches that tissue AND that state?"
    default: null

  - id: D4
    param: referenceLabelColumn
    kind: required
    source: data
    depends_on: [D3]
    ask: "Which column of the reference holds the cell type labels, and at what granularity?"
    default: null

  - id: D5
    param: markerValidation
    kind: required
    source: user
    depends_on: [D1]
    ask: "Should the consensus labels be checked against canonical marker expression before they are accepted?"
    default: "checked - method agreement measures consistency, not correctness"

  - id: D6
    param: validationMarkerPanel
    kind: required
    source: literature
    depends_on: [D2, D5]
    ask: "Which canonical markers should the consensus types be confirmed against?"
    default: null
    skip_if: "marker validation declined"

  - id: D7
    param: consensusThreshold
    kind: required
    source: user
    ask: "How many of the annotation methods must agree before a label is trusted?"
    default: "80% agreement"

  - id: D8
    param: methodSubset
    kind: required
    source: user
    ask: "Run the full method panel, or drop the slow model-based ones?"
    default: "all methods"

  - id: D9
    param: variableGeneCount
    kind: optional
    source: user
    ask: "How many variable genes should the embedding and nearest-neighbour methods use?"
    default: 4000

  - id: D10
    param: trainingEpochs
    kind: optional_conditional
    source: data
    depends_on: [D8]
    ask: "Do the model-based methods need longer training for a large or complex query?"
    default: "50 unsupervised, 20 semi-supervised"
    skip_if: "model-based methods excluded"

  - id: D11
    param: gpuUse
    kind: never_ask
    source: data
    reason: "Falls back to CPU automatically; affects runtime only"
    default: true

D1 is asked even though the user has arrived at an ensemble annotator, because the alternative is not visible from here: manual marker naming and reference transfer fail in opposite directions. If the answer is manual only, this skill is not the tool — see single-cell-annotation-guide.

D5 matters more here than it looks. The agreement score in D7 measures whether the methods concur, not whether they are right — several methods sharing one unsuitable reference agree with each other confidently. Markers are the only outside check. D4 sets the granularity of every downstream comparison: a reference labelled at lineage level cannot produce subtype calls.

Quick Start

Minimal pipeline from labeled reference and unlabeled query to annotated result:

import popv
import scanpy as sc

# Load reference (labeled) and query (unlabeled) AnnData objects
adata_ref = sc.read_h5ad("reference_atlas.h5ad")  # adata_ref.obs["cell_type"] exists
adata_query = sc.read_h5ad("query_dataset.h5ad")

# Prepare combined object with popV preprocessing
adata = popv.preprocessing.Process_Query(
    adata_ref,
    adata_query,
    ref_labels_key="cell_type",
    ref_batch_key="batch",
    query_batch_key="batch",
    unknown_celltype_label="unknown",
    save_path_trained_models="./popv_models/",
    n_epochs_unsupervised=50,
)

# Run all annotation methods
popv.annotation.annotate_data(adata)

# Inspect consensus results for query cells
query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
print(adata[query_mask].obs[["popv_prediction", "popv_agreement"]].head(10))

Core API

Module 1: Reference and Query Data Setup

Both AnnData objects must share a gene space and have required metadata columns. popV will subset to the intersection of genes automatically.

import anndata as ad
import scanpy as sc
import numpy as np

# Reference: must have cell type labels and (optionally) batch metadata
adata_ref = sc.read_h5ad("reference_atlas.h5ad")
print(f"Reference: {adata_ref.n_obs} cells x {adata_ref.n_vars} genes")
print(f"Cell types: {adata_ref.obs['cell_type'].nunique()} unique labels")
print(f"Reference cell type counts:\n{adata_ref.obs['cell_type'].value_counts().head(10)}")

# Query: no labels required; batch metadata optional
adata_query = sc.read_h5ad("query_dataset.h5ad")
print(f"\nQuery: {adata_query.n_obs} cells x {adata_query.n_vars} genes")

# Check gene overlap (popV will handle subsetting but >70% overlap is recommended)
shared_genes = adata_ref.var_names.intersection(adata_query.var_names)
pct_shared = len(shared_genes) / adata_ref.n_vars
print(f"\nShared genes: {len(shared_genes)} ({pct_shared:.1%} of reference genes)")
if pct_shared < 0.5:
    print("WARNING: <50% gene overlap — annotation quality may be reduced")

# Verify required fields before popV setup
assert "cell_type" in adata_ref.obs.columns, "Reference needs cell type labels"

# Add batch column if absent (popV requires it even for single-batch data)
if "batch" not in adata_ref.obs.columns:
    adata_ref.obs["batch"] = "ref_batch"
if "batch" not in adata_query.obs.columns:
    adata_query.obs["batch"] = "query_batch"

print("Reference obs columns:", adata_ref.obs.columns.tolist())
print("Query obs columns:    ", adata_query.obs.columns.tolist())

Module 2: POPV Object Creation (Process_Query)

Process_Query combines reference and query, normalizes counts, selects HVGs, and prepares the joint embedding needed by all annotation methods.

import popv

# Create processed combined AnnData
adata = popv.preprocessing.Process_Query(
    adata_ref,
    adata_query,
    ref_labels_key="cell_type",      # obs column with reference labels
    ref_batch_key="batch",           # obs column with reference batch info
    query_batch_key="batch",         # obs column with query batch info
    unknown_celltype_label="unknown",# label to use for query cells before annotation
    save_path_trained_models="./popv_models/",  # directory for scVI/SCANVI model checkpoints
    n_epochs_unsupervised=50,        # scVI training epochs (increase to 100–200 for large datasets)
    n_epochs_semisupervised=20,      # scANVI fine-tuning epochs
    use_gpu=True,                    # GPU for scVI/SCANVI (falls back to CPU if unavailable)
    hvg=4000,                        # number of highly variable genes to use
)

print(f"Combined object: {adata.n_obs} cells x {adata.n_vars} genes")
print(f"Dataset labels: {adata.obs['_dataset'].value_counts().to_dict()}")
# Expected: {'ref': N_ref, 'query': N_query}

Module 3: Running the Method Ensemble

annotate_data runs all selected methods sequentially and adds per-method label columns plus the consensus to adata.obs.

import popv

# Run annotation with default set of methods
popv.annotation.annotate_data(
    adata,
    methods=[
        "knn_harmony",    # KNN on Harmony-corrected embedding
        "knn_bbknn",      # KNN on BBKNN cross-batch graph
        "knn_scvi",       # KNN on scVI latent space
        "scanvi_popv",    # Semi-supervised scANVI label transfer
        "celltypist_popv",# CellTypist logistic regression
        "rf",             # Random Forest on HVG expression
        "xgboost",        # XGBoost classifier
        "svm",            # Support Vector Machine
        "onclass",        # ONCLASS (ontology-guided)
    ],
)

# Inspect per-method result columns (all end in "_popv")
query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
popv_cols = adata.obs.filter(like="_popv").columns.tolist()
print(f"Per-method columns: {popv_cols}")
print(adata[query_mask].obs[popv_cols + ["popv_prediction", "popv_agreement"]].head(10))

Module 4: Consensus Results and Agreement Scoring

popv_prediction is the majority-vote consensus; popv_agreement is the fraction of methods that agreed on the winning label.

import pandas as pd

query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
query_obs = adata[query_mask].obs.copy()

# Consensus label distribution
print("Consensus cell type distribution:")
print(query_obs["popv_prediction"].value_counts().head(15))

# Agreement score statistics
print(f"\npopv_agreement statistics:")
print(query_obs["popv_agreement"].describe())
# agreement = 1.0 → all methods agree; agreement = 0.2 → only 2/10 methods agree

# Cells with high confidence (>80% method agreement)
high_conf = query_obs["popv_agreement"] >= 0.8
print(f"\nHigh-confidence cells (agreement >= 0.8): {high_conf.sum()} ({high_conf.mean():.1%})")

# Cells with low confidence — candidate novel states or annotation gaps
low_conf = query_obs["popv_agreement"] < 0.5
print(f"Low-confidence cells  (agreement <  0.5): {low_conf.sum()} ({low_conf.mean():.1%})")

Module 5: Visualization

popV provides built-in UMAP and heatmap visualization of per-method agreement and consensus labels.

import popv
import scanpy as sc
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Compute UMAP on the joint reference+query embedding (if not already present)
if "X_umap" not in adata.obsm:
    sc.tl.umap(adata)

# popV built-in visualization: UMAP panel showing consensus + agreement
popv.visualization.predict_celltypes_umap(
    adata,
    save="popv_annotation_umap.png",
)
print("Saved popv_annotation_umap.png")

# Custom UMAP panels
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(21, 6))
sc.pl.umap(adata, color="popv_prediction", ax=axes[0],
           title="popV Consensus", legend_loc="on data",
           legend_fontsize=6, show=False)
sc.pl.umap(adata, color="popv_agreement", ax=axes[1],
           cmap="RdYlGn", vmin=0, vmax=1,
           title="Method Agreement Score", show=False)
sc.pl.umap(adata, color="_dataset", ax=axes[2],
           title="Reference vs Query", show=False)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig("popv_custom_umap.png", dpi=150, bbox_inches="tight")
print("Saved popv_custom_umap.png")

Key Concepts

Method Ensemble and Majority Voting

popV runs each method independently; the final prediction is determined by plurality vote across all methods. The popv_agreement score equals the fraction of methods that voted for the winning label (e.g., 0.7 = 7/10 methods agreed). This design has several properties:

• Robustness: if one method fails or produces outlier labels, the consensus is unaffected if the remaining methods agree
• Uncertainty signal: low agreement does not mean the annotation is wrong — it often flags biologically interesting cells (transitional states, rare populations) that differ from all reference cell types
• Method independence: KNN-based methods depend on the embedding quality; tree-based methods (RF, XGBoost) work directly on expression; SVM works in feature space; CellTypist uses a separate logistic regression. Together they span multiple algorithmic families

Method Comparison

Method	Batch Correction	Speed	Best For
knn_harmony	Harmony	Fast	Moderate batch effects, large datasets
knn_bbknn	BBKNN	Fast	Diverse multi-tissue references
knn_scanorama	Scanorama	Fast	Multiple heterogeneous batches
knn_scvi	scVI VAE	Medium	Complex batch effects, probabilistic embedding
scanvi_popv	scVI+labels	Slow	Semi-supervised; most accurate when reference is clean
celltypist_popv	None (logistic)	Fast	Immune cells; works well without batch correction
rf	None	Medium	Balanced class distributions; interpretable feature importance
xgboost	None	Medium	High-confidence predictions on well-separated cell types
svm	None	Medium	High-dimensional gene expression; linear boundaries
onclass	None	Medium	Ontology-aware; handles unseen cell types via CL ontology

ONCLASS and Ontology-Aware Annotation

ONCLASS uses the Cell Ontology (CL) to represent cell types as nodes in a knowledge graph and predict unseen cell types by propagating similarity through the ontology. Unlike other methods, ONCLASS can predict a cell type that was not present in the training reference if it is ontologically adjacent to known types. Enable it by including "onclass" in the methods list.

Reference Quality Requirements

popV annotation quality scales directly with reference quality:

• Minimum cell count per type: 50–100 cells per label; rare types with <20 cells may be missed by KNN methods
• Balanced representation: highly imbalanced references (one type is 80% of cells) cause tree methods to be biased toward the majority class
• Label granularity: coarse labels (10 types) annotate reliably; fine-grained labels (100+ types) require a larger, matched reference

Common Workflows

Workflow 1: Standard Reference-Query Annotation

Goal: Annotate an unlabeled query dataset using a curated reference atlas end-to-end.

import popv
import scanpy as sc
import pandas as pd

# 1. Load data
adata_ref = sc.read_h5ad("reference_atlas.h5ad")   # has obs["cell_type"] and obs["batch"]
adata_query = sc.read_h5ad("query_dataset.h5ad")   # no cell type labels
if "batch" not in adata_query.obs.columns:
    adata_query.obs["batch"] = "query"

# 2. Preprocess: build joint normalized object
adata = popv.preprocessing.Process_Query(
    adata_ref,
    adata_query,
    ref_labels_key="cell_type",
    ref_batch_key="batch",
    query_batch_key="batch",
    unknown_celltype_label="unknown",
    save_path_trained_models="./popv_models/",
    n_epochs_unsupervised=100,
    n_epochs_semisupervised=30,
    use_gpu=True,
    hvg=4000,
)
print(f"Prepared: {adata.n_obs} total cells")

# 3. Run ensemble annotation
popv.annotation.annotate_data(adata)

# 4. Extract query results
query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
query_annotations = adata[query_mask].obs[[
    "popv_prediction", "popv_agreement",
    "knn_harmony_popv", "scanvi_popv", "rf_popv", "xgboost_popv"
]].copy()

# 5. Transfer back to original query object
adata_query.obs = adata_query.obs.join(
    query_annotations, how="left"
)
print(f"Annotated {query_mask.sum()} query cells")
print(query_annotations["popv_prediction"].value_counts().head(10))

# 6. Save annotated query
adata_query.write_h5ad("annotated_query.h5ad", compression="gzip")
query_annotations.to_csv("popv_annotations.csv")
print("Saved annotated_query.h5ad and popv_annotations.csv")

Workflow 2: Confidence Filtering and Novel Cell State Detection

Goal: Separate high-confidence annotations from ambiguous cells; flag candidate novel or transitional states for manual review.

import popv
import scanpy as sc
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Assume adata has been annotated (as in Workflow 1)
query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
query_obs = adata[query_mask].obs.copy()

# Tier cells by agreement score
bins = [0.0, 0.5, 0.8, 1.01]
labels = ["low (<0.5)", "medium (0.5–0.8)", "high (≥0.8)"]
query_obs["confidence_tier"] = pd.cut(
    query_obs["popv_agreement"], bins=bins, labels=labels, right=False
)
print("Cells per confidence tier:")
print(query_obs["confidence_tier"].value_counts())

# High-confidence subset: use popv_prediction directly
high_conf_mask = query_obs["popv_agreement"] >= 0.8
print(f"\nHigh-confidence annotations ({high_conf_mask.mean():.1%} of query cells):")
print(query_obs[high_conf_mask]["popv_prediction"].value_counts().head(10))

# Low-confidence subset: inspect per-method disagreement
low_conf = query_obs[query_obs["popv_agreement"] < 0.5]
popv_method_cols = [c for c in query_obs.columns if c.endswith("_popv") and
                    c not in ("popv_prediction", "popv_agreement")]
print(f"\nLow-confidence cells sample (showing per-method labels):")
print(low_conf[popv_method_cols + ["popv_prediction"]].head(10).to_string())

# Save agreement + confidence-tier summaries; render the tier bar chart with the omics-plotting
# SKILL (skills/data-visualization/omics-plotting/SKILL.md) "Box / Violin / Bar" recipe -> figures/popv_confidence_distribution.png
query_obs[["popv_agreement", "confidence_tier"]].to_csv("popv_confidence.csv")
print(query_obs["confidence_tier"].value_counts().to_string())

Key Parameters

Parameter	Module	Default	Range / Options	Effect
ref_labels_key	Process_Query	—	Any obs column	Column in adata_ref.obs containing training cell type labels
n_epochs_unsupervised	Process_Query	50	20–500	scVI training epochs; increase for better embedding on large/complex datasets
n_epochs_semisupervised	Process_Query	20	10–100	scANVI fine-tuning epochs on top of scVI
hvg	Process_Query	4000	2000–8000	Highly variable genes used for embedding and KNN methods
use_gpu	Process_Query	True	True, False	GPU acceleration for scVI/SCANVI; falls back to CPU automatically if no GPU
methods	annotate_data	all	List of method names	Subset of methods to run; excluding slow methods (scanvi, onclass) speeds up pipeline
unknown_celltype_label	Process_Query	"unknown"	Any string	Label assigned to query cells before annotation; used to separate reference labels from query
popv_agreement	(output)	—	0.0–1.0	Fraction of methods agreeing on consensus label; >=0.8 recommended for high confidence

Best Practices

1. Check gene overlap before running: popV performs best with >70% gene overlap between reference and query. If overlap is <50%, annotation quality degrades significantly — consider using a different reference or imputing missing genes.

   shared = adata_ref.var_names.intersection(adata_query.var_names)
   print(f"Gene overlap: {len(shared) / adata_ref.n_vars:.1%}")
   

2. Use raw counts as input: pass raw (un-normalized) counts in adata.X to Process_Query. popV internally applies its own normalization. Pre-normalized data can distort the scVI/SCANVI latent space.

3. Match reference granularity to query biology: if your query contains subtypes not in the reference, no method will correctly assign them — they will appear as low-agreement cells. Either add them to the reference or accept that the consensus will assign the nearest parent type.

4. Exclude slow methods when speed matters: scanvi_popv and onclass are the slowest. For a quick first-pass, run only knn_harmony, knn_bbknn, rf, xgboost, and celltypist_popv.

   popv.annotation.annotate_data(adata, methods=["knn_harmony", "knn_bbknn", "rf", "xgboost", "celltypist_popv"])
   

5. Save trained models for repeated queries: Process_Query stores scVI/SCANVI models in save_path_trained_models. Reuse these when annotating additional query batches against the same reference to avoid retraining.

Common Recipes

Recipe: Subset to High-Confidence Annotations Only

When to use: downstream analyses (DE, trajectory) require clean labels; exclude ambiguous cells.

import scanpy as sc

# Annotate as in Workflow 1 first
query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
adata_query_annotated = adata[query_mask].copy()

# Keep only high-confidence cells
high_conf = adata_query_annotated[adata_query_annotated.obs["popv_agreement"] >= 0.8].copy()
print(f"High-confidence cells: {high_conf.n_obs} / {adata_query_annotated.n_obs} "
      f"({high_conf.n_obs/adata_query_annotated.n_obs:.1%})")
print(high_conf.obs["popv_prediction"].value_counts())

# Recompute UMAP on high-confidence subset for visualization
sc.pp.neighbors(high_conf, use_rep="X_scVI")  # use scVI embedding stored by popV
sc.tl.umap(high_conf)
sc.pl.umap(high_conf, color="popv_prediction", save="_high_conf_celltypes.png")

Recipe: Per-Method Label Comparison Heatmap

When to use: understanding where methods disagree to identify systematic biases or novel populations.

import pandas as pd

query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
query_obs = adata[query_mask].obs.copy()

# Collect per-method columns
method_cols = [c for c in query_obs.columns
               if c.endswith("_popv") and c not in ("popv_prediction", "popv_agreement")]

# Cross-tabulate two key methods
ct = pd.crosstab(
    query_obs["knn_harmony_popv"],
    query_obs["scanvi_popv"],
    margins=False,
)
# Normalize rows
ct_norm = ct.div(ct.sum(axis=1), axis=0)
ct_norm.to_csv("popv_method_agreement.csv")
print(f"Method agreement matrix: {ct_norm.shape} -> popv_method_agreement.csv")
# Render with the omics-plotting SKILL (`skills/data-visualization/omics-plotting/SKILL.md`) "Expression heatmap" recipe (Blues, 0..1)
# -> figures/popv_method_agreement_heatmap.png

Recipe: Fast Annotation Without Deep Learning Methods

When to use: quick annotation without GPU or when scVI/SCANVI training is prohibitively slow (>500k cells).

import popv

# Process without training deep generative models (scVI not needed for KNN-Harmony)
adata = popv.preprocessing.Process_Query(
    adata_ref,
    adata_query,
    ref_labels_key="cell_type",
    ref_batch_key="batch",
    query_batch_key="batch",
    unknown_celltype_label="unknown",
    save_path_trained_models="./popv_models/",
    n_epochs_unsupervised=0,   # skip scVI training
    n_epochs_semisupervised=0, # skip scANVI training
    use_gpu=False,
    hvg=3000,
)

# Run only fast non-DL methods
popv.annotation.annotate_data(
    adata,
    methods=["knn_harmony", "knn_bbknn", "knn_scanorama", "rf", "xgboost", "svm", "celltypist_popv"],
)

query_mask = adata.obs["_dataset"] == "query"
print(adata[query_mask].obs[["popv_prediction", "popv_agreement"]].describe())

Troubleshooting

Problem	Cause	Solution
KeyError: ref_labels_key not in adata_ref.obs	Reference lacks a cell type column	Verify the column name: print(adata_ref.obs.columns.tolist()); update ref_labels_key accordingly
Gene space mismatch error	Reference and query have very few shared genes	Check adata_ref.var_names.intersection(adata_query.var_names); if <50% overlap, use a different reference or match gene panels
CUDA out-of-memory for scVI/SCANVI	GPU VRAM insufficient for batch size	Set use_gpu=False or reduce n_epochs_unsupervised; scVI falls back to CPU automatically on most systems
onclass_popv failures on small datasets	ONCLASS requires sufficient label coverage	Remove "onclass" from the methods list when reference has <10 cell types or <500 cells per type
Very slow annotation (>2 hours)	scVI/SCANVI training on large reference	Subsample reference to 50k cells per type; exclude "scanvi_popv" and "onclass" from methods
All cells receive same consensus label	Reference highly imbalanced toward one type	Balance reference by subsampling the dominant type or upsampling rare types before running popV
popv_agreement is 0 for many cells	Many methods returning different labels	Inspect per-method columns; consider whether reference covers the query biology; add methods or retrain with a better reference

Related Skills

• celltypist-cell-annotation — single-model annotation with pre-trained logistic regression; faster but lacks ensemble uncertainty
• scanpy-scrna-seq — preprocessing pipeline (QC, normalization, clustering) that produces AnnData inputs for popV
• scvi-tools-single-cell — scANVI for probabilistic label transfer with a single deep generative model; use when you prefer a formal variational framework over ensemble voting
• harmony-batch-correction — Harmony embedding used by knn_harmony method internally; understand it to tune popV's KNN-based methods

References

• GitHub: YosefLab/popV — official source code, installation instructions, and example notebooks
• popV documentation — API reference and tutorials
• Ergen et al., bioRxiv 2023 — "Population-level integration of single-cell datasets enables multi-scale analysis across samples", original popV preprint
• ONCLASS paper — Wang et al., Nature Methods 2021 — ontology-aware cell type classification underlying the ONCLASS method in popV