本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

transcript-analysis

This skill should be used when analyzing Claude Code session transcripts, reviewing agent performance, finding anti-patterns or tool misuse, mining workflow patterns, running kaizen analysis, debugging agent behavior, or performing session forensics.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • references/duckdb-queries.md12.8 KB
  • references/jsonl-schema.md1.1 KB
  • references/session-log-schema.md23.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Transcript Analysis

Analyze Claude Code JSONL session transcripts to detect anti-patterns, inefficiencies, and workflow improvement opportunities.

Data Location

Find transcripts under ~/.claude/projects/ in project-specific directories named after the project path (with hyphens replacing slashes).

DuckDB’s role: Load the full field/path reference from kaizen-analysis via get_transcript_jsonl_schema or MCP resources/read kaizen://session-log/schema, then use kaizen-duckdb execute_query to run any DuckDB SQL over those files (see DuckDB Query Patterns for examples and the arbitrary-query workflow). Session history stays in JSONL on disk. Path rules for the DuckDB MCP (absolute paths, no ~ in SQL).

~/.claude/projects/{project-key}/
├── {uuid}.jsonl              # Main session transcripts
├── agent-{id}.jsonl          # Orphan agent transcripts
└── {uuid}/
    ├── subagents/
    │   └── agent-{id}.jsonl  # Subagent transcripts
    └── tool-results/
        └── {tool-use-id}.txt # Async task outputs

JSONL Record Types

Each JSONL line is a JSON object discriminated by the type field.

Primary record types for analysis:

  • assistant — LLM response turns containing tool calls and text
  • user — Human input and tool results
  • system — Metadata events (stop_hook_summary, turn_duration, compact_boundary, api_error, local_command)
  • progress — Hook execution and subagent streaming
  • file-history-snapshot — File edit tracking
  • summary — Session title/summary

For full schema details including JSON structures for each record type, see JSONL Schema Reference.

Signal Catalog

Each analysis dimension below has its own extraction methodology.

1. Tool Misuse Detection

Extract from assistant.message.content[] where name == "Bash". Parse input.command for file-operation patterns that should use built-in tools. For SQL extraction queries, see DuckDB Query Patterns.

Parse tool_use blocks for Bash commands matching:

  • grep → should use Grep tool
  • find -name → should use Glob tool
  • cat, head, tail → should use Read tool
  • ls → should use Glob or Bash(ls) with description
  • sed, awk → should use Edit tool

Exclude legitimate uses in pipelines (git ... | grep, uv run ... | head).

2. Repeated Errors

Extract from tool results where is_error: true. Classify error types:

  • "File has not been read yet" — Edit-before-Read anti-pattern
  • "String to replace not found" — stale Edit target
  • "User denied tool use" — permission/trust issue
  • Pre-commit hook failures (exit code 1)
  • Missing binary / command not found

3. Missing Tooling Opportunities

Identify repeated multi-step manual workflows across sessions via tool-sequence trigram analysis. High-frequency trigrams like Bash → Bash → Bash or Read → Read → Read suggest missing scripts or skills.

4. Subagent Delegation Patterns

Extract from Task tool_use blocks. Track subagent_type, description, model. Flag when general-purpose is used where a specialized agent exists.

5. Shortest Path Analysis

Compare successful vs failed attempts at the same goal. Measure tool-call count between goal statement (user turn) and successful outcome (final assistant turn). High variance across sessions for similar goals indicates wasted steps.

6. Red Herring Detection

Track investigation branches that get abandoned. Signal: a sequence of Read/Grep/Bash calls on a topic followed by compact_boundary or direction change without resolution. Cross-session frequency of the same abandoned paths reveals systematic red herrings.

7. System Process Interruptions

Extract system.compact_boundary, system.api_error, and hook-related progress events. Map their position relative to active work to identify when system processes derailed correct execution paths.

8. Missing Hooks

Identify manual corrections that recur across sessions. When the same correction appears 3+ times, it is a candidate for automated prevention via PreToolUse hook (deny + redirect) or SubagentStart hook (inject context).

9. DuckDB SQL Querying

Use kaizen-analysis get_transcript_jsonl_schema or resource kaizen://session-log/schema for the full path reference, then kaizen-duckdb execute_query for any SQL over JSONL (read_ndjson_auto with absolute paths). You are not limited to the cookbook queries.

For the arbitrary-query workflow and examples, see DuckDB Query Patterns.

Process Mining Methodology

Use the kaizen-analysis MCP server tools for analyses SQL cannot express:

  • extract_tool_sequences — Convert JSONL → ordered tool-call arrays per session
  • discover_process_model — Lightweight transition model over tool-call sequences
  • check_conformance — Compare sessions against a reference process model
  • find_frequent_patterns — PrefixSpan sequential pattern mining
  • cluster_sessions — Trace clustering by behavioral similarity

Analysis Workflow

flowchart TD
    Start([Receive analysis task]) --> Scope{Scope defined?}
    Scope -->|--project flag| Project[Filter to project transcripts]
    Scope -->|No flag| Default[Use current project]
    Project --> Discover[SQL — count sessions, date range, record types]
    Default --> Discover
    Discover --> Dimensions{Which dimensions?}
    Dimensions -->|All| RunAll[Run all dimensions]
    Dimensions -->|Specified| RunSelected[Run selected dimensions]
    RunAll --> Aggregate[Aggregate findings]
    RunSelected --> Aggregate
    Aggregate --> Write[Write to .planning/kaizen/analysis-DATE.md]

Output Format

Write analysis findings to .planning/kaizen/ as structured markdown with:

  • Session ID and date for each finding
  • Severity (critical / warning / info)
  • Evidence — exact JSON field paths and values
  • Frequency — how many sessions exhibit the pattern
  • Recommendation type — hook, skill patch, agent prompt fix, CLAUDE.md update

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Add automated documentation updater to any Claude skill. Creates a Python sync script that downloads upstream docs, processes markdown for AI consumption, and maintains local cache with configurable refresh. Collects template variables, then delegates implementation through 5-phase workflow. Use when adding auto-updating reference documentation to plugins or skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月9日 更新

SAM-style feature initiation workflow — discovery through codebase analysis, architecture spec, task decomposition, validation, and context manifest. Use when a user asks to add a feature, plan a feature, or convert an idea into an executable SAM plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月9日 更新

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月9日 更新

Browser automation for AI agents using the agent-browser CLI and Playwright. Use when navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, logging into sites, or automating any browser task. Triggers on "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "scrape data", "test this web app", "automate browser actions", or any programmatic web interaction request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月9日 更新

Runs the description-drift experiment — spawns all Claude Code agents simultaneously to collect self-reported capabilities, then compares them against static frontmatter descriptions to reveal how reliable orchestrator routing based on descriptions actually is. Use when measuring description drift across the agent fleet, re-running the capability collection experiment, analyzing a specific agent's self-reported capabilities, or auditing whether frontmatter descriptions accurately reflect agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月9日 更新

Create or adapt Claude Code agent definitions. Use when creating an agent, changing subagent configuration, selecting agent scope, or designing a specialized delegation role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月9日 更新

Jamie-BitFlight のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する