本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

caveman-manage

Inspect Caveman Cloud's experiment lifecycle and block unsafe execution. Use when asked to start, approve, cancel, promote or roll back a Caveman experiment.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Manage eval-gated experiments

Treat every lifecycle change as a production control action. Read current state and results, then report one supported recommendation or block. Current agent MCP is intentionally read-only: control-api does not yet enforce a complete lifecycle transition table and evidence gate atomically.

Non-negotiable gates

  1. A request to review, inspect, explain, or recommend authorizes reads only.
  2. Never approve an experiment whose results are pending, whose required guardrails are absent, or whose evidence reports a breach.
  3. Never convert experiment lift into verified_savings. Only active real traffic plus provider-causal, provider-complete ledger evidence can do that.
  4. Never supply an organization id. Project and tenant scope come from the logged-in Caveman identity and server RBAC.
  5. Never execute a lifecycle mutation, even after user approval. Exact <action>:<experiment_id> strings are agent-generatable and are not proof of human intent.
  6. Unknown states and server errors fail closed. Report exact cave_snake_code.

Step 1 — Load project and experiment

Prefer MCP:

caveman_context {}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"get","experiment_id":"<id>"}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"results","experiment_id":"<id>"}

Use {"action":"list"} when the user has not named an id.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud experiments list
caveman cloud experiments show <id>
caveman cloud experiments results <id>

Stop if login, project, experiment, or results are unavailable.

Step 2 — Evaluate evidence

Report:

  • current lifecycle state and safety class;
  • control and candidate sample sizes;
  • quality or eval result;
  • latency, error, cost, retry, drop, and escalation guardrails when present;
  • evidence cost;
  • rollback or hold reason;
  • whether result is pending, failed, promotable, or active.

Absence is not a pass. If a required field is absent, state evidence incomplete and do not propose approval.

Step 3 — Propose one action

Allowed actions:

  • start — only from a startable draft or queued state with configured graders;
  • approve — only with complete passing evidence and a safety class the current role may approve;
  • cancel — stop a non-active experiment the user no longer wants;
  • rollback — revert an active or harmful change through the server's linked policy path. Current deployments may reject this honestly with cave_not_implemented; never describe that response as a rollback.

Show recommendation and id:

Proposed action: approve experiment 7f...
Reason: candidate passed quality and every configured guardrail.
Execution: blocked until server-authoritative lifecycle and evidence gates ship.

Do not treat earlier generic statements such as "manage it" or "do what is best" as mutation approval.

Step 4 — Block unsafe execution

Do not emit or run an executable lifecycle command. Explain that current server does not yet enforce every evidence/state transition atomically. CLI and MCP agent surfaces therefore expose experiment reads only.

Step 5 — Re-read after external operator action

If operator says they executed command, read detail and results again. Report server-observed post-state, audit or result response, and any policy-delivery status returned. Never infer success from operator intent alone.

Use this close:

Action: <action> <experiment-id>
Before: <state>
Server response: <status and cave_snake_code if any>
After: <re-read state>
Basis: experiment evidence only. Verified savings unchanged unless the signed
ledger independently records active, provider-causal real-traffic savings.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

cavecrew

無料

When to delegate to `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit) or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of working inline or using `Explore`. Their output is compressed, so main context lasts longer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JuliusBrussee/caveman11.1万2026年10月12日 更新

caveman

無料

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JuliusBrussee/caveman11.1万2026年10月12日 更新

Write a Conventional Commits message compressed to intent only. Use for "write a commit", "commit message", /commit or /caveman-commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JuliusBrussee/caveman11.1万2026年10月12日 更新

Compress a memory file such as CLAUDE.md or a todo list into caveman format to save input tokens, keeping a readable backup. Trigger: /caveman-compress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JuliusBrussee/caveman11.1万2026年10月12日 更新

Find and label every LLM workflow in the repository so Caveman Cloud groups spend by workflow instead of one bucket. Use for "discover workflows" or breaking LLM spend down by workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JuliusBrussee/caveman11.1万2026年10月12日 更新

Read-only review of Caveman Cloud evidence: cost, Cave Score, workflows, traces, latency, errors, routing, savings. Use when asked what Caveman found or where LLM spend goes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JuliusBrussee/caveman11.1万2026年10月12日 更新

JuliusBrussee のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する