本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

os-say-simple

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks for simpler or shorter about something said or written - "say it simply", "what does this mean", "I don't understand your answer", "too long", "wait, what?", "bro" - in any language, about any text: your own answer, a report, a review comment, an error. "I don't understand what to DO" is os-step-by-step; this skill restates text. It restates for a reader who does not read code: leads with the point, keeps every number, warning and caveat - no facts added, no bad news dropped. A number returns exactly that many points, most important first.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • references/01-wall-of-text.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

os-say-simple

A text exists and the user cannot use it. This skill rewrites it into words they can act on - the pack's rescue skill: the others fire at moments of work, this one whenever any text, including your own, needs saying again properly. It changes only the words. Never the facts.

Language

Write in the language the user speaks in this session. Detect it from the conversation. Keep code, file names and identifiers in English.

When to use

  • The user asks for simpler or shorter, in any phrasing: "say it simply", "in plain words", "what does this mean", "I don't understand", "too long", "wait, what?", "bro".
  • The user pastes text and asks what it says.
  • The user gives the skill a number - they want exactly that many points.

Not this skill:

  • "Is this true?" is verification - os-check-work; a restatement stays exactly as true as its source.
  • "What do I do?" right after an answer that asked the user to act is a walkthrough - os-step-by-step. Asked about the road ahead, it is os-whats-next.

What text to restate

  1. Whatever the user points at: pasted text, a named file, a report in the reports folder. Read it if it is a file.
  2. Nothing pointed at: your own last substantial answer. A bare "wait, what?" always means the thing you just said.

The controlled-language rules

Drawn from the ideas behind ASD-STE100, the Simplified Technical English standard from aerospace manuals. This pack follows the ideas; it does not claim conformance to the standard.

  • One sentence, one idea. In instructions: one action per sentence.
  • Active voice. Name who does what - "the check refused the deploy", never "the deploy was refused".
  • Short sentences. A sentence that needs a breath in the middle is two.
  • One word, one meaning - and one meaning, one word. Never rotate synonyms for the same thing; the reader will assume the difference is meaningful.
  • Present tense unless the time itself is the fact.
  • Lists over dense paragraphs - but a list is not permission to drop the connections between items.

These rules shape every restatement - and when a term has to stay (rule 6), the sentences around it obey them with the term kept exact.

With a number

3 means exactly three points. Most important first, one sentence each.

  • Fewer real points than asked for: give the real ones and say the source holds no more. Never pad.
  • A warning or a risk is always one of the points. It outranks good news.

Hard rules

  1. Add nothing, drop no bad news. Every warning, risk, number and caveat in the source survives the rewrite. A summary that loses the ⚠ line is a lie by omission. Security, data loss and anything hard to undo are spelled out in full, never shortened.
  2. Numbers stay exact. No rounding money, counts or dates. A ticket or pull request number that names an action stays.
  3. As true as the original, no truer. The source's claims stay claims: "the report says the tests pass", not "the tests pass" - unless this session verified it. Offer os-check-work when the user needs true.
  4. Unclear stays unclear. Where the source is ambiguous, say "the original does not say" - never resolve ambiguity by guessing.
  5. Lead with the point. No preamble, no "here is a simpler version" - the first line is already the answer.
  6. A term with no plain equivalent gets described by what the user would see or do, with the term once in brackets - same move as the whole pack.
  7. Code and commands are exact strings. Never paraphrase what someone would type or run; explain around it.
  8. Aim for half the length or less - except where rule 1 or an exact-N request forbids it.

Known gotchas

  • "I don't understand" about your own answer is feedback, not an attack. Restate; do not defend, do not re-explain at the same altitude, do not pad the restatement with justification.
  • Restating is not editing. If while restating you notice your original was wrong, that is a correction - say so plainly. Never fix it silently inside the "simpler" version.
  • Mid-task "wait, what?" - restate, then continue the task. Do not lose the thread the question interrupted.
  • A text that is already plain gets one line saying so and nothing else. Manufacturing a different version to look useful is padding.
  • No number given, long source - the one-screen rule from the rest of the pack applies: about ten lines, fifteen at the ceiling.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

ALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kharmanskyi/open-steps1,2822026年10月6日 更新

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks where the project as a whole stands - "where are we", "what's the big picture", "what have we built", "what is in this project", "map the project", "what does this thing even do", "what is stale", "what can we delete", "update the roadmap" - in any language, and whenever a session report has just been written. It keeps one file, BIG-PICTURE.md: what the product is, every feature with how far it got, which parts nobody has touched, and what is queued next. Age and wiring are measured from git; how far a feature got comes from the reports or says "not checked". Where a tracker is connected it offers to open the queue as tickets, after a yes and never before. Never invents work, never deletes code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kharmanskyi/open-steps1,2822026年10月6日 更新

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks about work done outside this session - "check work", "check the others", "check other sessions" - or to accept one: "the session is done, check it", "can we merge it" - in any language. You are the receiving party: treat the report as a claim, verify each part against machine state, name every gap between claimed and true. Verified-ready work merges in the same pass. End with what is left, one next step, and any reply another session needs, ready to paste.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kharmanskyi/open-steps1,2822026年10月6日 更新

ALWAYS invoke this skill when work wraps up or the user asks how it went - "done or not", "are we done", "what happened", "report", "what's the status of this ticket" - in any language, and when a Stop hook asks for a session report. Produces a ten-line plain- language report: a lead, a checkmark table, and a verdict - fully done, anything needed from you, new debt, safe to close. Every "yes" names its proof; unverified says "not checked". Saves the report so the next session starts from it instead of re-exploring the repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kharmanskyi/open-steps1,2822026年10月6日 更新

ALWAYS invoke this skill when you need the user to act - run a command, paste a secret, click, approve - and whenever they ask how to do something or say they do not know what to do: "step by step", "walk me through it", "what do I do", "what should I do", "I don't understand what to do", "explain what I need to do", in any language. Picking which task comes next is os-whats-next; this skill is for doing the thing in front of you. First earn the ask: try it yourself, find another route, shrink it to the part only they can do. Then one action per step, commands labelled by what they touch, no jargon. Commands are single lines that prompt for any value - typing hidden for secrets - and confirm in plain words. Afterwards verify their step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kharmanskyi/open-steps1,2822026年10月6日 更新

ALWAYS invoke this skill before anything hard to undo gets agreed to - a contract, a purchase, a migration, a launch, a price change, a reorganisation - and whenever the user asks "what could go wrong", "what are we missing", "poke holes in this", or for a premortem or a red team, in any language. Assumes the decision already failed and works backwards to find out why, in a fresh agent that had no hand in making it. Sweeps nine areas and shows what each produced, including the empty ones. Ends on one verdict: go ahead, go but fix these first, try it small first, think again, do not do this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kharmanskyi/open-steps1,2822026年10月6日 更新

kharmanskyi のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する