Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
From 24 failure memories:
ALWAYS before:
Rule applies to:
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use at the START of every task, before writing any code, running tests, debugging, reviewing, or designing. This skill determines which methodology and domain skills must be invoked. MUST be invoked before any implementation, debugging, review, testing, or specification work begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pattern for progressively refining context retrieval to solve the subagent context problem
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
proposal.md が /spec の入力として十分な情報を含んでいるかを確認する。「ユーザーにとっての承認」ではなく「/spec にとっての準備完了度」を検証する軽量チェック
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when splitting a domain Skill into Phase-Aware File Structure (SKILL.md / design.md / constraints.md). Defines the splitting criteria, procedures, sync procedures, and validation rules. Invoked by /skill-format command or manually when restructuring domain Skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/brainstorm のユーザーストーリー品質を INVEST 基準で軽量チェックする。proposal.md 生成前にストーリーの構造的品質を確認し、問題があれば対話で改善を促す