本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

api-design-rest

When creating or extending an HTTP API for client consumption.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

RESTful API Design

Purpose

REST APIs MUST be intuitive, predictable, and semantically correct. This skill ensures APIs use HTTP methods correctly, communicate errors clearly via standard formats, and maintain consistency across resources so clients can interact with them reliably without surprise behavior.

When to use

  • Building a new backend service exposing resources
  • Adding a new domain entity to an existing API
  • Creating integration endpoints for third-party partners
  • Designing webhooks or callback mechanisms
  • Standardizing an inconsistent API across a microservices architecture

When NOT to use

  • Error handling specifics (use Error Handling Architecture skill)
  • API authentication/authorization (separate concern)
  • Rate limiting or throttling strategies (separate concern)
  • GraphQL design (different paradigm)

Inputs required

  • Existing API codebase or documented business entities
  • HTTP framework (Express, Django, FastAPI, etc.)
  • OpenAPI/Swagger familiarity preferred

Workflow

  1. Identify Resources: Map business entities to Plural Nouns (users, orders, invoices, not getUsers)
  2. Assign Verbs: Map CRUD operations to HTTP methods: GET (read), POST (create), PUT (replace), PATCH (update), DELETE (remove)
  3. Design URL Hierarchy: Nest resources logically but NO DEEPER than 2 levels (e.g., /users/{id}/orders ONLY)
  4. Standardize Responses: All success payloads wrapped consistently; all errors use RFC 7807 format
  5. Add Pagination: For collection endpoints, REQUIRE limit and offset (or cursor-based pagination)
  6. Version the API: Use /v1/ prefix or header-based versioning from day one
  7. Document with OpenAPI: Generate OpenAPI schema automatically or maintain it in sync

Rules

  • MUST use HTTP status codes semantically (see failure conditions below)
  • MUST NOT use verbs in URLs (no GET /getUsers)
  • MUST NOT nest resources beyond 2 levels deep
  • MUST use lowercase URLs with hyphens for multi-word resource names
  • MUST require API versioning
  • MUST return RFC 7807 problem details for ALL errors
  • MUST paginate collection responses

Anti-patterns

  • Verbs in URLs: GET /getUsers, POST /createOrder (use nouns + HTTP methods)
  • HTTP 200 for Errors: Returning 200 with { status: 'error' } payload (use 4xx/5xx status codes)
  • Deep Nesting: /companies/{id}/departments/{id}/employees/{id}/tasks (use max 2 levels)
  • Mixed Status Codes: Endpoint returns 200 for success, 200 for validation errors (inconsistent)
  • Unversioned APIs: Adding /api/users without versioning path for future breaking changes

Failure conditions

  • URLs contain action verbs
  • HTTP 200 returned for failed requests
  • Resource nesting exceeds 2 levels
  • Collection endpoint has no pagination
  • Errors not in RFC 7807 format
  • API has no versioning strategy

Validation checklist

  • All resource URLs are plural nouns (users, orders, not getUsers)
  • HTTP methods used semantically (GET=read, POST=create, PATCH=partial, DELETE=remove)
  • No verbs in URL paths
  • Status codes are correct (201 for create, 204 for delete, 400 for validation, 500 for server errors)
  • All error responses use RFC 7807 format with type, title, detail, status
  • Collection endpoints support limit and offset parameters
  • URLs include version (e.g., /v1/users or header-based)
  • URLs use lowercase with hyphens (e.g., /user-profiles not /userProfiles)
  • Resource nesting does not exceed 2 levels
  • OpenAPI schema is generated or synchronized

Output format

  • Response structure: JSON with consistent key naming (snake_case or camelCase, not mixed)
  • Error format: RFC 7807 Problem Details (type, title, detail, status, instance)
  • Pagination: Include limit, offset, total in collection response envelope
  • Versioning: /v1/ URL prefix or API-Version: 1.0 header
  • Documentation: OpenAPI 3.0+ schema

Security considerations

  • Pagination defaults MUST have max limits (prevent DOS via limit=999999999)
  • Error messages MUST NOT leak internal implementation details
  • Resource IDs should not expose sequential patterns (use UUIDs, not auto-increment)
  • API MUST enforce authentication/authorization (separate skill)
  • Rate limiting MUST be enforced (separate skill)

Agent execution notes

  • Agent MAY: Create new endpoints, design resource hierarchies, add pagination, generate OpenAPI schema
  • Agent MUST NEVER: Use verbs in URLs, return 200 for errors, nest beyond 2 levels, mix status code semantics
  • Agent MUST ASK: Before changing versioning strategy, before modifying existing endpoint contracts
  • Agent MUST VALIDATE: All status codes correct, no URL verbs, pagination present, RFC 7807 errors

Example

❌ Anti-pattern (Verbs in URL, wrong status codes, deep nesting, no pagination):

GET /api/getUsers HTTP/1.1

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{
  "status": "error",
  "message": "User not found"
}

GET /api/companies/123/departments/456/employees/789/tasks/assignToUser HTTP/1.1

✅ Correct pattern (Nouns, semantic status, proper nesting, paginated):

GET /v1/users?limit=20&offset=0 HTTP/1.1

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{
  "data": [...],
  "pagination": {
    "limit": 20,
    "offset": 0,
    "total": 150
  }
}

GET /v1/users/123 HTTP/1.1

HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
{
  "type": "https://api.example.com/errors/resource-not-found",
  "title": "Resource Not Found",
  "detail": "The requested user does not exist",
  "status": 404,
  "instance": "/v1/users/123"
}

GET /v1/users/123/orders?limit=10&offset=0 HTTP/1.1

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

When designing and implementing web interfaces to ensure they are usable by everyone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KraitDev/skiLL.Md62026年6月8日 更新

When improving read performance and reducing database load.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KraitDev/skiLL.Md62026年6月8日 更新

When configuring automated build, test, and deployment workflows for a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KraitDev/skiLL.Md62026年6月8日 更新

When asynchronously reviewing peer code before merging into the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KraitDev/skiLL.Md62026年6月8日 更新

When addressing slow application endpoints, high database CPU usage, or standardizing data access patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KraitDev/skiLL.Md62026年6月8日 更新

When isolating and fixing unpredictable or complex software bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KraitDev/skiLL.Md62026年6月8日 更新

KraitDev のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する