本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

rfc-writer

Write well-structured RFCs with normative clauses. Use when: (1) Creating a new RFC, (2) Adding or editing RFC clauses, (3) User mentions RFC, specification, or normative requirements

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

RFC Writer

Write RFCs that are precise, complete, and follow govctl conventions.

Invocation Mode

This helper skill may be used standalone or by /discuss, /gov, /spec, or /migrate. It is responsible for RFC content and clause quality, not RFC lifecycle verbs. Use /spec or /gov for govctl rfc finalize, bump, or advance.

Quick Reference

govctl rfc new "<title>"
govctl clause new <RFC-ID>:C-<NAME> "<title>" -s "<section>" -k <kind>
govctl clause edit <RFC-ID>:C-<NAME> --stdin <<'EOF'
clause text
EOF

RFC Structure

Every RFC should have:

  1. Summary clause (informative) — what this RFC covers and why
  2. Specification clauses (normative) — the actual requirements
  3. Rationale sections within clauses — why each requirement exists

Summary Clause Template

govctl clause new <RFC-ID>:C-SUMMARY "Summary" -s "Summary" -k informative
govctl clause edit <RFC-ID>:C-SUMMARY --stdin <<'EOF'
Brief overview of what this RFC specifies and why.

**Scope:** What is covered and what is not.

**Rationale:** Why this specification is needed.
EOF

Normative Clause Template

govctl clause new <RFC-ID>:C-<NAME> "<Title>" -s "Specification" -k normative
govctl clause edit <RFC-ID>:C-<NAME> --stdin <<'EOF'
The system MUST ...
The system SHOULD ...
The system MAY ...

**Rationale:**
Why this requirement exists.
EOF

Writing Rules

RFC 2119 Keywords

Use these keywords in ALL CAPS in normative clauses:

KeywordMeaning
MUSTAbsolute requirement
MUST NOTAbsolute prohibition
SHOULDRecommended but not required
SHOULD NOTDiscouraged but not prohibited
MAYOptional

Quality Checklist

  • Be specific. Avoid vague terms: "appropriate", "reasonable", "as needed". Say exactly what.
  • Include rationale. Every normative clause should explain why, not just what.
  • One requirement per sentence. Don't chain MUST/SHOULD in a single sentence.
  • Reference existing artifacts. Use [[RFC-NNNN]] or [[ADR-NNNN]] syntax.
  • Testable. Each MUST/SHOULD should be verifiable — if you can't test it, rewrite it.

Clause Naming

  • Use C- prefix followed by a descriptive uppercase name with hyphens
  • Good: C-VALIDATION, C-ERROR-FORMAT, C-WORK-DEF
  • Bad: C-1, C-Misc, C-stuff

Section Types

SectionClause KindContent
SummaryinformativeOverview, scope, rationale
SpecificationnormativeMUST/SHOULD/MAY requirements
RationaleinformativeExtended explanation

Rendering Rules

The renderer auto-generates structural elements. Do NOT include these in clause text:

  • Clause heading (### [RFC-XXXX:C-NAME] Title) — auto-generated from metadata
  • *Since: vX.Y.Z* — auto-generated from the since JSON field
  • > **Superseded by:** ... — auto-generated from the superseded_by field
  • Amended: ... — does not exist; do not hallucinate this

Clause text should contain only the specification prose, rationale, and [[...]] references.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Vague MUST: "MUST handle errors appropriately"Specific: "MUST return Result<T, E> with descriptive error message"
No rationaleAdd **Rationale:** section explaining why
Untestable requirementRewrite so it can be verified programmatically
Missing cross-referencesAdd [[RFC-NNNN]] or [[ADR-NNNN]] links
Including Since: in clause textDon't — the renderer adds it from the since field automatically
Including clause heading in textDon't — the renderer generates ### [RFC:C-NAME] Title from metadata

Validation and Handoff

  • Run govctl check after substantive RFC edits
  • Use rfc-reviewer before lifecycle handoff
  • Use /spec for clarification-only or artifact-only RFC maintenance
  • Use /gov for implementation-bearing RFC amendments

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Write effective Architecture Decision Records. Use when: (1) Creating a new ADR, (2) Recording a design decision, (3) User mentions ADR, decision, trade-off, or alternatives

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lucifer1004/typub352026年7月11日 更新

commit

無料

Commit changes with govctl integration — check work item status, update journal or notes, and run govctl check

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lucifer1004/typub352026年7月11日 更新

Stress-test a design decision with premortem/backcast analysis, then produce a risk-calibrated recommendation that maps to ADR fields. Use when: (1) Multiple competing architecture options, (2) Irreversible or high-risk design choices, (3) /discuss identifies a complex trade-off

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lucifer1004/typub352026年7月11日 更新

discuss

無料

Facilitate design discussion — research context, clarify requirements, draft RFC/ADR

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lucifer1004/typub352026年7月11日 更新

gov

無料

Execute governed implementation workflow with work items, RFC/ADR checks, phase gates, testing, and closure. Use when: (1) User invokes /gov, (2) A non-trivial change needs work item tracking, (3) Implementation may require RFC/ADR handling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lucifer1004/typub352026年7月11日 更新

Write well-structured Verification Guards. Use when: (1) Creating a new guard, (2) Editing guard check commands or patterns, (3) User mentions guard, verification, or check

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lucifer1004/typub352026年7月11日 更新

lucifer1004 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する