本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

automation-pipeline-integration

Wire the automation test project into the repository's own pipeline so every task must pass the suite before it can leave QA

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Automation Pipeline Integration

Overview

An automation suite that only runs when someone remembers it is decoration. The suite must run in the repository's own pipeline — the one this platform triggers automatically when a task moves to ready_for_qa — so a task cannot pass QA while the suite is red. Each repository runs its own tests in its own pipeline; there is no shared cross-project test job.

How the platform runs it

When a task reaches ready_for_qa, the QA pipeline runs the repo's build and test stages: the repository's test_command override if set, otherwise language auto-detect. A red pipeline sends the task back to need_revision automatically with the failed stage's log; a green pipeline releases the task to QA dispatch. Check results with get_pipeline_status; re-trigger manually via the task's pipelines endpoint after a fix.

Wiring the suite in

  1. One entrypoint command. Give the automation project a single script that provisions everything and exits non-zero on any failure — e.g. scripts/e2e.sh: start disposable dependencies (Testcontainers/compose), boot the app from the current branch build, start WireMock stubs, run the suite, tear down.
  2. Make the pipeline call it. Set the repository's test_command to run unit tests AND the automation entrypoint (go test ./... && ./qa-automation/scripts/e2e.sh, or the package.json script that does both). If the repo's CI (GitHub Actions etc.) is the source of truth for deploys, add the same entrypoint there too — same command locally, in the QA pipeline, and in CI, so green means the same thing everywhere.
  3. Keep it self-contained. The pipeline environment provides no shared DB and no external network guarantees: the suite brings its own database container (test-database-seeding) and stubs (test-doubles-wiremock). If the environment has no container runtime, the entrypoint must fail loudly with a clear message — never silently skip tests and report green; raise the infra gap on the task instead.
  4. Keep it fast and deterministic. Budget the suite (minutes, not an hour); parallel-safe, order-independent tests; no sleeps, no shared state. Flaky tests get fixed or quarantined with a task — a suite people rerun until green enforces nothing.

Coverage reporters are mandatory

The platform parses the test job's log for a total coverage percentage and surfaces it on the pipeline and job — but only if the suite prints one in a format it recognizes. A suite with no coverage reporter enabled leaves that number blank, silently, and nobody is told the pipeline stopped proving anything about coverage. Every automation/unit suite wired into test_command must enable one:

  • Go: go test -cover ./... (prints a coverage: NN.N% of statements line per package), or go tool cover -func=coverage.out after a -coverprofile=coverage.out run (prints the total: (statements) NN.N% summary line).
  • JS/TS (Jest/Vitest): run with --coverage so the run ends with an istanbul text summary (Lines : NN.N% or the All files | ... | NN.N | table) in the job's stdout — not only an HTML/lcov file the log never shows.
  • Python (pytest): pytest --cov with the default terminal report, which prints a TOTAL ... NN% line.

The report must land in the job's console output (stdout/stderr), because that is the only thing the platform's log-based parser can read — a coverage artifact written only to disk (coverage.out, lcov.info, htmlcov/) and never printed is invisible to it.

The QA contract per task

  • After the manual pass, this task's scenarios are added to the suite (e2e-automation-project).
  • The suite — including the new tests — is green: run it yourself and/or confirm the pipeline (get_pipeline_status) after your changes land.
  • Only then does the task move to pm_uat, with the suite result quoted in the evidence comment.

New scenarios accumulate: every finished task widens the regression net that all future tasks must pass.

Red Flags

  • The automation project exists but no pipeline or CI job executes it.
  • test_command runs unit tests only, and the e2e suite is "run manually sometimes".
  • The entrypoint skips the suite when dependencies are missing and still exits 0.
  • Tests pass locally but the pipeline lacks the runtime/config to run them — fix the pipeline, don't drop the tests.
  • The suite runs but prints no coverage total (no -cover/--coverage/--cov flag), so the pipeline's coverage badge never appears even though tests genuinely ran.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

makifbaysal のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する