Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a screen design was approved (the design task is in done) - the hand-off document implementers build from - components mapped to the inventory, tokens, every state, responsive behaviour per breakpoint, accessibility notes and exact copy
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Every task blocked by this design task receives its documents in its run context as TEXT, under "## The approved design this task builds" — the hand-off specs first, then every mockup, the variants that were not chosen included. The markup of a mockup is dropped, so its colours, sizes and layout do not survive the trip. The hand-off spec is what they can act on. It is written after approval, from the chosen variant only, and it names things — components, tokens, copy — instead of describing pixels.
Core principle: An implementer reading only this spec builds the approved screen without inventing a single value, string or state.
One markdown document per screen, attached in the done run with add_task_document, titled handoff: <screen> — the same <screen> as its design: <screen> · <letter> mockups. Under ~10,000 characters: a markdown document reaches a dependent's run cut at 12,000, and the end is what gets cut.
# handoff: Invoices — list
Design task D-14 · approved: Variant A — table first, mockup `design: Invoices — list · A` (#variant-a, #states-a) — chosen by the human's "Chosen variant" comment · not chosen, never built: `design: Invoices — list · B` · design system Harbor base v3 + web layer v1
## Screen map
375: title row (Invoices · New invoice) → search → status chips (scroll sideways) → invoice rows → "Load more"
1440: sidebar 240px | content: title row → search + chips in one row → table (Customer, Number, Issued, Due, Amount, Status) → pagination
## Components
| Element | Component | Variant / props | |
|---|---|---|---|
| New invoice | atoms/Button | variant primary, size md, icon Plus | existing |
| Search | molecules/SearchField | placeholder "Customer or invoice number" | existing |
| Status | atoms/Badge | paid → success, overdue → destructive, draft → muted; always with its text | existing |
| Invoice row (375) | molecules/InvoiceRow | customer + number left; amount + status right; due date below | NEW · molecule · states: default, pressed, focus-visible |
## Tokens
colour: background, surface (table header), foreground, muted-foreground (secondary lines), border, primary/on-primary, destructive (overdue) · type: heading-2 (title), body, body-sm (secondary), tabular numbers for amounts · space: 4 (375 page padding), 6 (1440), 3 (row padding) · radius: md · shadow: none — rows are separated by border
## States
- Loading: six skeleton rows in the row's shape; title, search and New invoice stay visible.
- Empty, first use: "No invoices yet" · "Create your first invoice and send it in under a minute." · primary "New invoice".
- Empty, no match: "No invoices match "{query}"" · ghost "Clear search".
- Error: banner above the list: "Invoices couldn't load. Check your connection and try again." · "Retry"; search and chips keep their values.
- Row: hover (1440) surface background; focus-visible 2px ring inset; pressed (375) surface background.
- Dark: tokens only, no per-component overrides.
## Responsive
| Width | Behaviour |
|---|---|
| < 640 (375) | rows, chips scroll sideways, "Load more" instead of pagination |
| 768 | table: Customer (number below), Amount, Status |
| 1024 | full table; sidebar collapses to icons |
| ≥ 1280 (1440) | full table; sidebar 240px; content max 1200px |
## Accessibility
- One h1 "Invoices"; the table has a visually hidden caption and column headers.
- Status is text + colour, never colour alone. Each row is one link named "<customer>, invoice <number>".
- Focus order: search → chips → New invoice → rows → pagination. Touch targets ≥ 44px at 375.
- Checked contrast: muted-foreground/background 6.06:1 · on-primary/primary 7.52:1 (light), 7.17:1 (dark).
- The result count after a search is announced politely.
## Copy
| Where | Text |
|---|---|
| title | Invoices |
| primary action | New invoice |
| search placeholder | Customer or invoice number |
| chips | All · Draft · Sent · Overdue · Paid |
## Out of scope
Bulk actions, CSV export, the invoice detail page.
Chosen variant: <document title> naming one of its documents, else the answered variant question, else its recommended answer. The header names its document by exact title and how it was chosen, and lists the other variant documents as not chosen — they reach the developer's run too, and this line is what tells them apart. Beyond that line the others do not appear, not even as "alternative".muted-foreground, space.4), never a hex or a pixel the design system does not hold.INVENTORY.md.sm/md/lg/xl); mobile: compact / medium / expanded width, landscape, 200% text, safe areas and the keyboard.#1F5F4A, 14px) anywhere in the spec.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。