本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

java-persistence

Use when a Java service reads or writes the database - JPA/Hibernate and Panache/Spring Data mapping, transaction boundaries, pagination and avoiding N+1 and entity-over-the-wire leaks

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Java Persistence (JPA / Panache / Spring Data)

Overview

Persistence is where Java services most often leak — lazy-loading exceptions, N+1 queries, entities serialized over HTTP, pagination applied in memory. Keep persistence at the repository boundary and mapped deliberately.

Core principle: Entities are a persistence detail. They never cross the HTTP boundary and they never carry business logic that belongs in the domain. Every list query is bounded AND the bound is honored by the SQL, not by Java code truncating a full result set.

Mapping surface

ConcernQuarkus (Panache)Spring Data
Entity@Entity + PanacheEntityBase or plain @Entity@Entity
Repositoryimplements PanacheRepository<Task>extends JpaRepository<Task, UUID>
Queryfind("status", s) / HQLderived methods / @Query
Transaction@Transactional on the service@Transactional on the service
Pagination.page(Page.of(n, size))Pageable / Page<T>
Optimistic lock@Version@Version
Schema management (non-test)quarkus.hibernate-orm.schema-management.strategy=none (or validate; property renamed from database.generation in 3.23)spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto=validate

Rules

  • Transaction boundary = the service method, never the repository or the resource. One use-case = one transaction.
  • Never return entities from a controller/resource. Map to a DTO inside the service (or a JPA projection). Returning entities causes lazy-init serialization errors and leaks the schema.
  • Fetch deliberately to avoid N+1. A loop that touches a lazy collection per row issues a query per row. Use a JOIN FETCH / entity graph / @BatchSize or hibernate.default_batch_fetch_size, and verify with a query-count assertion in a test.
  • Never paginate a collection JOIN FETCH. Hibernate applies LIMIT/OFFSET in memory when the query also fetches a *-to-many collection (warning HHH90003004) — it loads the whole table to paginate it. Set hibernate.query.fail_on_pagination_over_collection_fetch=true in the test profile so this fails loudly instead of shipping slow. Page the root entity's ids first (plain query, no fetch join), then fetch the page by id with the collection join, or rely on @BatchSize/hibernate.default_batch_fetch_size instead of a fetch join at all.
  • Bound every list query. Page (Page/Pageable, Panache .page(...)) — never findAll()/listAll() on a growing table. Default and maximum page size live with the endpoint (api-design-conventions), not just the repository call.
  • Migrations own the schema, not hibernate.hbm2ddl=update/Quarkus generate-schema. Set validate/none in non-test envs; schema changes go through a migration (postgres-migrations), never auto-DDL in production.
  • Optimistic locking (@Version) on entities with concurrent updates; map OptimisticLockException/ObjectOptimisticLockingFailureException to 409 in the central error mapper (api-design-conventions), never let it surface as 500.
  • spring.jpa.open-in-view=false (Spring) — Open Session In View hides N+1s in the view layer and that lazy access outside a clear transaction boundary is exactly the mistake this skill exists to prevent.

Worked Example — killing an N+1 without breaking pagination

// ❌ N+1: one query for projects, then one per project for its tasks
List<Project> projects = repo.findAll(pageable).getContent();
projects.forEach(p -> total += p.getTasks().size());   // lazy hit per row

// ❌ "fixed" with a fetch join but now unbounded: Hibernate pages in memory
@Query("select p from Project p left join fetch p.tasks")
Page<Project> findAllWithTasks(Pageable pageable);   // HHH90003004

// ✅ page the roots first (no collection fetch), then fetch by id with the join
Page<UUID> ids = repo.findIds(pageable);
List<Project> page = repo.findByIdInWithTasks(ids.getContent());

Add a query-count assertion (Hibernate Statistics, see java-testing-junit-mockito) so the N+1 can't creep back in, and a test on the test profile with hibernate.query.fail_on_pagination_over_collection_fetch=true so an accidental collection-fetch-plus-page regresses loudly instead of just getting slow.

Common Mistakes

  • @Transactional on the repository or resource instead of the service.
  • Serializing entities in the HTTP response.
  • findAll()/listAll() with no paging.
  • Paginating a query that also does a collection JOIN FETCH.
  • hbm2ddl=update / Quarkus schema generation in a real environment instead of migrations.
  • Testing on H2 where the SQL dialect differs from Postgres (java-testing-junit-mockito: use Testcontainers).
  • Letting OptimisticLockException surface as an unmapped 500.

Red Flags

  • LazyInitializationException in an HTTP response → you serialized an entity outside the transaction.
  • Query count scales with row count → N+1.
  • HHH90003004 in the logs, or a pagination query that also lists fetch in its JPQL.
  • Schema changes with no migration file in the diff.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

makifbaysal のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する