Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Java is chosen but Quarkus does not fit - build the service with Spring Boot using the same clean layering, only when a required library lacks a Quarkus extension or the repo already standardizes on Spring
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Quarkus is the default (see quarkus-service-architecture). Spring Boot is the fallback — reach for it only when Quarkus genuinely does not fit. The architecture is the same clean layering; only the annotations and container differ.
Core principle: Same layered design as Quarkus. Spring is a container choice, not a license to sprawl.
If none of these hold, use Quarkus.
| Layer | Quarkus | Spring Boot |
|---|---|---|
| Resource/Controller | JAX-RS @Path | @RestController @RequestMapping |
| Service | @ApplicationScoped | @Service |
| Repository | Panache | JpaRepository (Spring Data) |
| Validation | @Valid + Bean Validation | @Valid + Bean Validation |
| Config | @ConfigProperty | @ConfigurationProperties / @Value |
| Transaction | @Transactional (service) | @Transactional (service) |
@Autowired on fields.@Valid on the controller method.@RestControllerAdvice mapping domain exceptions to status codes — controllers stay thin.@RestController
@RequestMapping("/tasks")
class TaskController {
private final TaskService service;
TaskController(TaskService service) { this.service = service; } // constructor injection
@PostMapping
ResponseEntity<TaskResponse> create(@Valid @RequestBody CreateTaskRequest req) {
Task t = service.create(req.title());
return ResponseEntity.status(201).body(TaskResponse.from(t));
}
}
@Service
class TaskService {
private final TaskRepository repo;
TaskService(TaskRepository repo) { this.repo = repo; }
@Transactional
Task create(String title) {
Task t = Task.create(title); // domain enforces invariants
return repo.save(t);
}
}
tools.jackson.*) replaces the com.fasterxml.jackson.* import paths used through Boot 3.x — check which the repo is on before copying an import.ProblemDetail + spring.mvc.problemdetails.enabled=true, or throw ErrorResponseException — see api-design-conventions for the shape.RestClient or a declarative @HttpExchange interface client over a hand-rolled RestTemplate call.spring.mvc.apiversion.*) — use it instead of a custom header/path scheme when the repo needs to version an endpoint.ResponseEntity.created(uri) for a 201 with Location set, rather than building the header by hand.spring.jpa.open-in-view=false (java-persistence) and structured logging (logging.structured.format.console=ecs, available since 3.4) are repo-level settings, not per-task changes — follow what's already set.@MockitoBean/@MockitoSpyBean replace @MockBean/@SpyBean (removed in 4.0) — see java-testing-junit-mockito.@Autowired field injection — use the constructor.@RestControllerAdvice or the controller.@MockBean/RestTemplate-only patterns on a Boot 4 repo where the current idiom (@MockitoBean, RestClient) already applies.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。