本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

test-data-and-stubs

Use when a case needs data, a user/role, or a third-party dependency - seeding through the product first, test credentials, namespacing on shared environments, and stubbing an external HTTP service by hand

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Test Data and Stubs

Seed order

  1. Through the product's own API/UI (black-box; this exercises validation as a side effect).
  2. The repo's documented seed (make seed, npm run db:seed, prisma db seed — find it via get_project_brief or the README).
  3. SQL last, and only on a local DB.

Record the seed commands you ran in the case's evidence.

Database

The repo's docker-compose service (docker compose up -d db returns), else its documented local DB. No container runtime available → say so as a blocker (qa-verify-before-verdict's triage table), don't improvise a different engine — a SQLite stand-in for Postgres hides real dialect bugs.

Credentials

Pull from .env.example or the repo's own seed fixtures. Never a real person's account. A third-party sandbox key you don't have is a human blocker (ask_user), not something to work around.

Namespacing on shared environments

On stage: prefix everything you create with qa-<task-key>-…, clean it up when you're done, never run a destructive scenario there.

Stubbing a third-party HTTP dependency by hand

docker run -d --rm -p 8089:8080 wiremock/wiremock:3.13.2
curl -X POST localhost:8089/__admin/mappings -d '{"request":{"method":"POST","url":"/charge"},"response":{"status":402,"jsonBody":{"error":"declined"}}}'
# point the app's dependency URL env var at http://localhost:8089, drive the scenario, then:
curl -s localhost:8089/__admin/requests | jq '.requests[].request.url'  # no jq: node -e 'let d="";process.stdin.on("data",c=>d+=c).on("end",()=>JSON.parse(d).requests.forEach(r=>console.log(r.request.url)))'

Or use the repo's own mock server if it already has one — prefer that over standing up a second one.

After the round

Save a working boot+seed recipe to project memory (save_memory, scope=project) once it cost you real effort — the next QA round on this repo should not rediscover it.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月11日 更新

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月11日 更新

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月11日 更新

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月11日 更新

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月11日 更新

Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月11日 更新

makifbaysal のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する