本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

test-database-seeding

Use when a test needs a database - spin up a dedicated, disposable test database (Testcontainers) seeded with known data, never a shared or production database

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Test Database Seeding

Overview

Automated tests need a database that is real (same engine as production), isolated (no shared state), and seeded with known data. The answer is a disposable, per-run database — Testcontainers spins up a real Postgres in a container, migrated and seeded, torn down after.

Core principle: Real engine, disposable instance, known seed. Never point tests at a shared dev or production database, and never use an in-memory substitute whose SQL differs from production.

Why not the alternatives

ApproachProblem
Shared dev/staging DBFlaky: other work mutates it; tests collide and depend on order
Production DBNever — data risk, and tests would mutate real records
In-memory (H2/SQLite)Dialect gaps: queries pass in H2, fail on Postgres → bugs ship
Disposable real DB (Testcontainers)✅ real engine, isolated, reproducible

The Pattern

  1. Start a real DB container for the suite (Testcontainers): postgres:<same-major-as-prod>.
  2. Run the real migrations against it — the same migration files the app uses, so the schema is production-accurate.
  3. Seed known fixtures: insert the exact rows the scenario needs (a project, N tasks, a user with a role). Keep fixtures small and explicit — a test asserting "3 tasks" seeds exactly 3.
  4. Isolate per test: each test either runs in a transaction rolled back at the end, or truncates/reseeds between tests. No test sees another's data.
  5. Point the app/config at the container's connection string for the run.
  6. Tear down automatically when the suite ends.

Worked Example

@Testcontainers
class TaskExportIT {
    @Container static PostgreSQLContainer<?> db =
        new PostgreSQLContainer<>("postgres:16");

    @BeforeAll static void migrate() { Flyway.configure().dataSource(db.getJdbcUrl(),
        db.getUsername(), db.getPassword()).load().migrate(); }   // real migrations

    @BeforeEach void seed() {
        // exactly the rows this scenario needs
        insertProject("p1", "Demo");
        insertTasks("p1", 3);
    }

    @Test void export_returns_all_tasks() {
        var csv = export("p1");
        assertEquals(3, csvRows(csv));   // asserts against the known seed
    }
}

Same idea in Go (Testcontainers-Go), Node (testcontainers), etc. — a real Postgres, real migrations, explicit seed.

Rules

  • The container's engine and MAJOR version match production. No dialect gambling.
  • Migrations come from the app, not a hand-written schema — a stale test schema hides real migration bugs.
  • Seeds are explicit and minimal; assertions reference the seeded values.
  • Each test is independent (transaction rollback or reseed) and order-independent.
  • Combine with test-doubles-wiremock: real DB, stubbed external HTTP.

Common Mistakes

  • Pointing tests at a shared dev database → collisions and flakiness.
  • H2/SQLite instead of the real engine → dialect bugs ship green.
  • Hand-maintained test schema that drifts from the real migrations.
  • Tests that leave data behind and only pass in a specific order.

Red Flags

  • A test fails when run alone but passes in the suite (or vice versa) → shared/leftover state.
  • The test DB schema was created by a script other than the app's migrations.
  • Query passes in tests but fails in production → you tested a different engine.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月10日 更新

makifbaysal のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する