本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

cmux-test-bisect

Find when and why tests broke on main: bisect a Swift package suite on CI across old commits, read the failure matrix, and decide per test whether the test went stale or the code regressed. Use when a suite is red on main, when PR CI only ran filtered tests and the full suite has drifted, or when asked which PR broke a test.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml330 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

cmux test bisect

PR CI runs selected tests, so a package suite can stay red on main for weeks with nobody noticing. This skill finds the commit behind each failure on CI, never on the Mac (no full cmux builds on laptops).

App-host (cmuxTests) failures on main have their own automatic bisect (#14510). Use this skill for the SwiftPM package suites under Packages/iOS and Packages/Shared that test-ios.yml can run (CMUXMobileCore, CmuxSyncStore, CmuxMobilePairedMac, CmuxMobileChanges, CmuxMobileShell, CmuxMobileShellModel).

Before you start

  1. Get today's failing set from the red run: gh run view <run> --repo manaflow-ai/cmux --log-failed, then grep ✘ Test .* failed after. Run the full suite twice if you have not already. A test that appears in only one run is a flake candidate, not a regression.
  2. Search for an existing fix: gh search prs --repo manaflow-ai/cmux --state open '<test name>'.
  3. Work in your own worktree from upstream/main. If git log stops at a recent commit, the checkout is shallow: git fetch --shallow-since=<date> upstream main.

Run the bisect

T=scripts/ci/package_bisect.py
python3 $T --package CmuxMobileShell start --points 6 <old-sha>..upstream/main
python3 $T --package CmuxMobileShell status --wait     # up to 45 min
python3 $T --package CmuxMobileShell next --dispatch   # split each break window
python3 $T --package CmuxMobileShell cleanup           # delete probe branches
  • Each probe pushes bisect/<name>/<sha10> (the name defaults to the package): the old commit with today's iOS CI files laid over it and the package-lint gate dropped. Old commits carry old CI scripts, which is why a plain -f ref=<sha> dispatch fails early.
  • Probes leave the runner on auto (idle owned mini first, Blacksmith overflow). Do not pin a runner.
  • adopt <sha> <run-id> counts a test-ios.yml run with swift_package=<pkg> that already exists (a dispatch on main, or a probe run whose id start could not read) without dispatching again. A ci.yml run has no package job to read.
  • --filter <regex> narrows the suite once you are chasing a few tests; --paths changes which commits count as midpoint candidates (default: the iOS and Shared packages).
  • --patch <sha> (repeatable) applies a fix commit to every probe. Use it when older commits hang or fail to build for a reason you already know: bisect the question you have, not the known break.
  • --bisect <name> keeps a second experiment (for example the same commits with a --patch) beside the first. --package and --bisect go before the subcommand, and every later command for that bisect needs them too.
  • State is shared by every worktree of the checkout, in <git-common-dir>/package-bisect/<name>.json. Finished job logs are cached beside it per run attempt, so status --refetch costs one run lookup per probe and downloads only logs it has not seen.

Read the matrix

status prints one row per test and one column per probe, oldest first: X failed, . passed, - never ran at that probe, ? pending, E no test ran at all (compile or runner failure; check the log, rerun the run, then status --refetch; a rerun is a new attempt, so its log is read fresh).

Check the probe list first. A probe marked INCOMPLETE never printed its "Test run with" summary: the hung-test watchdog killed it or the job timed out, so every test after that point shows -. A - is never a pass: a suite that hangs early makes a whole cluster look like it "broke" at the commit that fixed the hang. Probe those commits again in a second bisect with the hang fix applied: python3 $T --package <pkg> --bisect <pkg>-patched start --patch <hang fix> <shas>.

VerdictMeaningNext
broken by <sha>Passed at the probe before, failed from here onRead that PR's diff against the test
broken in a..b (n watched commits)Window not yet one commit widenext --dispatch
failing at the oldest probeOlder than the bisectStart again further back, or trace with git log -S '<symbol>'
fixed by / fixed inFailed, then something fixed itUsually ignore; next --fixed splits these too
flakyPasses between failuresTreat as a flake; confirm with a focused rerun before fixing

Tests that break in the same window usually share one cause. Fix the cluster together.

Stale test or regression

Read the culprit PR, then decide per test:

  • Stale test: the PR changed behavior on purpose and says so (PR body, code comments, or other tests it updated in the same direction). Fix the test to express its original intent under the new behavior. Do not delete the assertion. If the old fixture now models the other case, keep a test for each.
  • Regression: the test's intent still holds and nothing in the PR argues it away. Fix the code, and keep the test as it was.
  • When unsure, prefer the reading that keeps the test's name true, and say which reading you chose in the PR.

Land it

  • One small PR per culprit or cluster, pushed to the org remote (git push mf <branch>, gh pr create --head <branch>).
  • Credit the PR that changed the behavior (link it, and mention its author).
  • Prove it with the focused suites: gh workflow run test-ios.yml --repo manaflow-ai/cmux --ref <branch> -f swift_package=<pkg> -f test_filter='<SuiteA|SuiteB>'. Finish with one full-suite run on the last PR.
  • Run cleanup so no bisect/ branches stay on the org remote.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

cmux

無料

End-user control of cmux topology and routing (windows, workspaces, panes/surfaces, focus, moves, reorder, identify, trigger flash). Use when automation needs deterministic placement and navigation in a multi-pane cmux layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manaflow-ai/cmux2.8万2026年10月12日 更新

cmux package architecture, refactor layering, dependency inversion, file organization, DocC documentation, package design discipline, testability, and Swift 6 concurrency rules. Use before adding or meaningfully rewriting Swift files, Swift packages, coordinators, services, repositories, or public package APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manaflow-ai/cmux2.8万2026年10月12日 更新

Backend TypeScript and Cloud VM development rules for cmux. Use when editing web/app/api, web/services, backend scripts, Cloud VM lifecycle, provider integrations, Postgres, Stack Auth pricing gates, migrations, or provider image build scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manaflow-ai/cmux2.8万2026年10月12日 更新

Stripe checkout, pricing, subscription, Pro plan, webhook, and entitlement runbook for cmux billing work. Use when editing or debugging billing, pricing, Stripe Checkout, subscription recording, Pro plan status, webhooks, entitlement metadata, or pricing dev/prod tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manaflow-ai/cmux2.8万2026年10月12日 更新

End-user browser automation with cmux. Use when you need to open sites, inspect or interact with browser surfaces, wait for page state, and extract data without stealing focus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manaflow-ai/cmux2.8万2026年10月12日 更新

Screenshot or record a cmux window from the CLI, for a pull request, a bug report, or to see what the app actually looks like right now. Use when a change is visual, when a drag or an animation cannot be described in text, or when a reviewer needs evidence rather than a claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manaflow-ai/cmux2.8万2026年10月12日 更新

manaflow-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する