本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

template-discovery

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md12.0 KB
  • manifest.json156 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Template Discovery

This skill helps an agent find, inspect, and select the right dotnet new template for a given task using dotnet new CLI commands for search, listing, and parameter inspection.

When to Use

  • User asks "What templates are available for X?"
  • User describes a project in natural language ("I need a web API with authentication")
  • User wants to compare templates or understand parameters before creating a project
  • User needs to know what a template produces (files, structure) before committing

When Not to Use

  • User wants to create a project — route to template-instantiation skill
  • User wants to author or validate a custom template — route to template-authoring skill
  • User wants a detailed side-by-side comparison of templates — route to template-comparison skill
  • User wants smart cross-parameter defaults during creation — route to template-smart-defaults skill
  • User is troubleshooting build issues — route to dotnet-msbuild plugin

Recommendation requests: answer first, confirm second. Inspection requests: inspect first. For a general "which template?" question, start from the Step 1 mappings so a transient CLI failure cannot leave the user without an answer. When the user explicitly asks what is installed, requests exact options/defaults, or asks for dry-run output, run the relevant dotnet new command before writing the final answer. Never end a turn on a dotnet new call or a "let me confirm..." teaser.

Inspection requests require inspection. If the user asks for installed choices, exact parameters/defaults, compatibility constraints, or the exact dry-run file list, run the corresponding dotnet new command. Do not replace observed data with remembered flags. Report a flag only when the current template's --help output contains it.

Inputs

InputRequiredDescription
User intent or keywordsYesNatural-language description or keywords (e.g., "web API", "console app", "MAUI")
Language preferenceNoC#, F#, or VB — defaults to C#
Framework preferenceNoTarget framework (e.g., net10.0, net9.0)

Workflow

For recommendations, use Step 1 before Steps 2–4. For explicit inspection requests, execute the requested inspection first and use Step 1 only as a fallback.

Step 1: Resolve intent to template candidates

Map the user's natural-language description to template short names and parameters using these mappings.

Intent → template short name(s):

Intent / phraseTemplate short name(s)
web api, web service, rest api, restful, api, minimal apiwebapi
web app, web applicationwebapp, blazorserver
mvcmvc
razor, razor pageswebapp
blazor, blazor web appblazor
blazor serverblazorserver
blazor wasm, blazor webassemblyblazorwasm
grpcgrpc
signalrwebapi, webapp
console, console app, command line, cliconsole
worker, background service, daemon, windows serviceworker
class library, library, lib, nuget packageclasslib
maui, mobile, cross-platform app, ios, androidmaui
desktopmaui, wpf, winforms
wpfwpf
winforms, windows formswinforms
winui, winui3winui3
test, unit testxunit, nunit, mstest
xunit / nunit / mstestxunit / nunit / mstest
solutionsln
aspire, .net aspireaspire-starter, aspire
azure functions, function app, serverlessfunc
orleansorleans
razor component, web componentrazorcomponent
razor class libraryrazorclasslib
gitignore / editorconfig / nuget config / global jsongitignore / editorconfig / nugetconfig / globaljson

Keyword → parameter:

Keyword / phraseParameterValue
authentication, auth, individual auth, individual accounts--authIndividual
windows auth--authWindows
azure ad, entra id--authSingleOrg
no auth, no authentication--authNone
controllers, with controllers--use-controllers(flag)
minimal api(default)—
aot, native aot--aot(flag)
docker, containerthe template's Docker/container optionvaries by template — confirm with --help (not all templates expose one)
net8 / .net 8 / dotnet 8--frameworknet8.0
net9 / .net 9 / dotnet 9--frameworknet9.0
net10 / .net 10 / dotnet 10--frameworknet10.0

These are starting guesses. Always confirm the real parameter names/choices with dotnet new <template> --help, because parameter names vary by template (e.g., --auth vs --Authentication).

Some mapped short names are not present in a default SDK install — templates like maui, winui3, aspire-starter/aspire, func, and orleans typically require a workload (dotnet workload install <id>) and/or an additional template package (dotnet new install <package>). If a mapped short name does not appear in dotnet new list, fall back to dotnet new list/dotnet new search to find the right template and the package/workload that provides it before recommending it.

Resilience — always answer, even if the CLI fails. The intent mapping above is a usable answer on its own. Run dotnet new commands sequentially, one at a time — the template engine uses a global mutex, so firing several dotnet new <template> --help/--dry-run calls concurrently can produce a transient "mutex"/"persistence" error and empty output. If a command fails, retry it once; if it still fails, fall back to this intent/parameter mapping and give the user a concrete recommendation, noting that the exact parameter names/choices could not be CLI-confirmed. Never end the turn with no answer because a CLI call errored.

Step 2: Search for templates

Use dotnet new search to find templates by keyword across both locally installed templates and NuGet.org:

dotnet new search blazor

Use dotnet new list to show only installed templates, with optional filters:

dotnet new list --language C# --type project
dotnet new list web

If the user explicitly asks you to check both installed templates and NuGet.org, run and report both searches even when the SDK already includes a suitable template. Distinguish the built-in choice from installable alternatives:

  • For an SDK-shipped template, say "no install needed — ships with the SDK" and do not invent a package requirement.
  • For each relevant NuGet result you recommend, copy the package ID from the actual search output and give dotnet new install <package-id>.
  • If the NuGet search returns no credible alternative, say so explicitly; the local match still answers the request.

Step 3: Inspect template details

Use dotnet new <template> --help to get full parameter details for a specific template — parameter names, types, defaults, and allowed values:

dotnet new webapi --help

Copy the observed option names, choices, defaults, and compatibility notes into the answer. For example, Windows Service support is not universally a worker-template flag. If the installed worker --help does not expose one, say so and distinguish template creation from post-creation hosting configuration; never invent --windows or --use-windows-service.

Step 4: Preview output

Use dotnet new <template> --dry-run to show what files and directories a template would create without writing anything to disk:

dotnet new webapi --name MyApi --auth Individual --dry-run

If the dry-run fails (transient "mutex"/"persistence" error), retry once; if it still fails, give a representative structure (template family and typical file kinds) and note it isn't CLI-confirmed. Do not invent specific values, choices, or file paths. When the dry-run succeeds, preserve every actual path from its output. For a long list, render those paths as a directory tree rather than a flat wall of full paths; do not omit or invent entries. Follow the tree with a one-line purpose for each key entry point (for example Program.cs, App.razor, and the project file). A file list without those explanations is incomplete.

If command execution is unavailable, do not stop at "run this yourself." Give the representative tree and key-file explanations from the known template family, clearly labeled as unconfirmed, so the user still receives a useful preview.

If the user says not to create files, every copy-pasteable creation command must include --dry-run. A plain dotnet new ... command contradicts that request even when you did not execute it yourself.

Step 5: Present findings

Lead with the answer as a ready-to-run command, then justify it. Required shape:

Use <template> — one-line why.

dotnet new <template> --name <Name> [--key params]

Then add supporting detail:

  • Key parameters and recommended values (with the choices, e.g. --auth: None | Individual | SingleOrg | Windows)
  • What to expect (files created, project structure)
  • Any prerequisites — name the exact package to install (dotnet new install <id>), or say "no install needed — ships with the SDK" for a built-in template

An answer without a concrete, copy-pasteable command is what makes this skill tie with a plain reply — always give the command to run next.

Validation

  • At least one template match was found for the user's intent
  • Template parameters are explained with types and defaults
  • User understands what the template produces before proceeding to creation
  • Exact-option claims came from this template's observed --help output
  • Advice-only commands that must not create files include --dry-run

Common Pitfalls

PitfallSolution
Skipping an explicitly requested NuGet search because a local template existsRun both dotnet new list <keyword> and dotnet new search <keyword>, then distinguish the built-in template from real installable alternatives.
Not searching NuGet when no local template matchesUse dotnet new search <keyword> to find installable templates on NuGet.org.
Not checking template constraintsSome templates require specific SDKs or workloads. Use dotnet new <template> --help to surface constraints before recommending.
Recommending a template without previewing outputAlways use dotnet new <template> --dry-run to confirm the template produces what the user expects.
A dotnet new call fails with a "mutex"/"persistence" error and you return nothingThese are transient (often from concurrent invocations). Run dotnet new calls sequentially, retry once, then fall back to the Step 1 intent mapping and still give the user a concrete answer.
Guessing a Windows Service or AOT flag from another SDK/templateQuote only options observed in dotnet new <template> --help; otherwise explain the post-creation path.

More Info

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Route gh-aw workflow design/create/debug/upgrade requests to the right prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4852026年10月11日 更新

Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. USE FOR: the repo needs a root .editorconfig; analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear; the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: choosing analyzers with no config change; formatting-only execution with no config ownership question. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4852026年10月11日 更新

Scans .NET code for ~50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4852026年10月11日 更新

Symbolicate the .NET runtime frames in an Android tombstone file. Extracts BuildIds and PC offsets from the native backtrace, downloads debug symbols from the Microsoft symbol server, and runs llvm-symbolizer to produce function names with source file and line numbers. USE FOR triaging a .NET MAUI or Mono Android app crash from a tombstone, resolving native backtrace frames in libmonosgen-2.0.so or libcoreclr.so to .NET runtime source code, or investigating SIGABRT, SIGSEGV, or other native signals originating from the .NET runtime on Android. DO NOT USE FOR pure Java/Kotlin crashes, managed .NET exceptions that are already captured in logcat, or iOS crash logs. INVOKES Symbolicate-Tombstone.ps1 script, llvm-symbolizer, Microsoft symbol server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4852026年10月11日 更新

Symbolicate .NET runtime frames in Apple platform .ips crash logs (iOS, tvOS, Mac Catalyst, macOS). Extracts UUIDs and addresses from the native backtrace, locates dSYM debug symbols, and runs atos to produce function names with source file and line numbers. Automatically downloads .dwarf symbols from the Microsoft symbol server using Mach-O UUIDs. USE FOR triaging a .NET MAUI or Mono app crash from an .ips file on any Apple platform, resolving native backtrace frames in libcoreclr or libmonosgen-2.0 to .NET runtime source code, retrieving .ips crash logs from a connected iOS device or iPhone, or investigating EXC_CRASH, EXC_BAD_ACCESS, SIGABRT, or SIGSEGV originating from the .NET runtime. DO NOT USE FOR pure Swift/Objective-C crashes with no .NET components, or Android tombstone files. INVOKES Symbolicate-Crash.ps1 script, atos, dwarfdump, idevicecrashreport.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4852026年10月11日 更新

Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering. USE FOR: .NET architecture choices; layer and domain boundary review; service decomposition; clean architecture, vertical slice, DDD, CQRS, and modular monolith decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4852026年10月11日 更新

managedcode のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する