本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

azure-resource-visualizer

Create clear architecture views of Azure resources and their relationships. Use this skill when users ask for diagrams, topology summaries, dependency maps, or deployment overviews. Generates Mermaid, ASCII, and structured documentation for architecture review and compliance.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md13.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Azure Resource Visualizer

Generate architecture diagrams and dependency maps from deployed Azure resources. Identify critical paths, trust boundaries, and potential failures.

Use This Skill When

  • The user asks to visualize an Azure architecture or deployment
  • The user needs dependency mapping for troubleshooting or review
  • The user needs architecture documentation for compliance or knowledge transfer
  • The user wants to understand data flow and trust boundaries

Context: Visualization Maturity

Immature: No diagrams, ad hoc PowerPoint slides, out of sync
Developing: Some Visio or manual diagrams, updated occasionally
Managed: Mermaid/ASCII generated from code/CLI, auto-updated → Target
Optimized: Real-time topology from infrastructure code, linked to runbooks and alerts

Required Inputs

  • Resource inventory: Subscription ID, resource groups, or IaC code
  • Scope: Single app, multi-app, entire subscription?
  • Audience: Architects, developers, operations, auditors?
  • Detail level: High-level (boxes) or detailed (properties, IPs)?
  • Trust boundaries: On-premises? External partners?
  • Data flow direction: Producer → Consumer orientation?

Decision Tree

What's the primary purpose of this diagram?
├─ Architecture review (for design) → High-level, show trade-offs
├─ Troubleshooting (incident) → Detailed, show data paths
├─ Compliance/audit (prove design) → Component-level, highlight controls
└─ Knowledge transfer (team onboarding) → Annotated, include SLOs

What's the intended audience?
├─ Technical architects → Include scaling, redundancy, failover
├─ Developers → Include APIs, data sources, CI/CD
├─ Operations → Include monitoring, alerting, runbooks
└─ Auditors → Include security, compliance, audit points

How detailed should it be?
├─ Executive summary → 3-5 main components, high-level flow
├─ Architecture design → All resources, dependencies, zones
└─ Forensic/detailed → Resource IDs, IPs, security rules, policies

Workflow

Phase 1: Collect Resource Inventory

  1. Query all resources (CLI or portal):

    # Get all resources in subscription
    az resource list --query "[].{name:name, type:type, group:resourceGroup}" -o table
    
    # Get all resources with details
    az graph query -q "resources | project name, type, resourceGroup, location, properties" -o table
    
  2. Map resource relationships:

    # Get VNet peering
    az network vnet peering list --resource-group $RG --vnet-name $VNET
    
    # Get service connections
    az network private-endpoint-connection list --resource-group $RG
    
    # Get role assignments
    az role assignment list --all --output table
    
  3. Document externals (on-premises, partner networks, public APIs):

    ├─ On-premises SQL Server (10.0.0.10)
    ├─ Partner API (api.partner.com)
    ├─ CDN (cdn.example.com)
    └─ Monitoring (Azure Portal, on-call system)
    

Phase 2: Identify Dependencies & Trust Boundaries

  1. Compute → Data dependencies:

    App Service
    ├─ Reads: SQL Database, Key Vault, Blob Storage
    ├─ Writes: Application Insights, Blob Storage
    └─ Calls: External API (partner.api.com)
    
  2. Network security & isolation:

    Public Internet
    └─ [Application Gateway] (0.0.0.0/0)
       └─ [NSG Allow 443]
          └─ [App Service] (private IP 10.1.1.0/24)
             └─ [NSG Allow SQL port 1433 to DB subnet]
                └─ [SQL Database] (private IP 10.1.2.0/24)
    
  3. Identity & access paths:

    App Service
    └─ System-assigned managed identity
       └─ Role: "Key Vault Secrets User"
          └─ [Key Vault] (access allowed)
    

Phase 3: Generate Diagrams

Example 1: High-Level Diagram (Mermaid)

graph TB
    Internet["Internet / Users"]
    CDN["Azure CDN"]
    AGW["Application Gateway"]
    AppSvc["App Service"]
    DB["SQL Database"]
    Storage["Blob Storage"]
    KV["Key Vault"]
    AppIns["Application Insights"]
    
    Internet -->|HTTPS| CDN
    Internet -->|HTTPS| AGW
    AGW -->|Private| AppSvc
    AppSvc -->|SQL| DB
    AppSvc -->|Blob| Storage
    AppSvc -->|Secret| KV
    AppSvc -->|Telemetry| AppIns
    
    style AppSvc fill:#lightblue
    style DB fill:#orange
    style KV fill:#red

Example 2: Network Topology (ASCII)

┌─ Public Internet ─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                             │
│  [User Browsers]                                           │
│        │                                                   │
│        ├─→ [Azure CDN] ←─ Static content                  │
│        │                                                   │
│        └─→ [App Gateway] (0.0.0.0/0)                      │
│             │ (443: HTTPS only, deny HTTP)                │
└─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────┘
              │
    ┌─────────▼──────────────────────────────────────────┐
    │ Hub VNet (10.0.0.0/16)                             │
    │  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
    │  │ App Subnet (10.0.1.0/24)                   │   │
    │  │  [App Service] (private)                   │   │
    │  │  └─ NSG: Allow 443 from App Gateway        │   │
    │  └────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
    │           │                                         │
    │           ├─→ DNS (Azure DNS)                       │
    │           │                                         │
    │  ┌────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐     │
    │  │ Data Subnet (10.0.2.0/24)                │     │
    │  │  [SQL Database] (private endpoint)       │     │
    │  │  └─ NSG: Allow 1433 from App Subnet      │     │
    │  └────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
    │           │                                         │
    │  ┌────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐     │
    │  │ Management Subnet (10.0.3.0/24)         │     │
    │  │  [Key Vault] (private endpoint)         │     │
    │  │  [Storage Account] (for backups)        │     │
    │  └────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
    └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
              │
    ┌─────────▼──────────────────────────────────────────┐
    │ Monitoring & Logging (Shared)                      │
    │  [Log Analytics Workspace]                         │
    │  [Application Insights]                            │
    │  [Storage Account] (logs archive)                  │
    └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Example 3: Data Flow Diagram

┌─ Producer ─────┐
│ Event Source   │
│ (Order placed) │
└───────┬────────┘
        │
        └──→ Service Bus Topic: "order-events"
             │
             ├──→ Subscription: "email-service" ──→ Logic App ──→ Send Email
             │
             ├──→ Subscription: "inventory-service" ──→ Function ──→ Update Inventory
             │
             └──→ Subscription: "analytics-service" ──→ Event Hub ──→ Stream Analytics
                                                                      ├──→ Power BI (dashboard)
                                                                      └──→ Alert (if anomaly)

Phase 4: Annotate Risk & Critical Paths

  1. Single points of failure:

    ⚠️ Critical Path: Users → Application Gateway → App Service → SQL Database
       - If App Gateway fails: No user access
       - If App Service fails: No processing
       - If SQL Database fails: Data unavailable
    
    ✓ Mitigations in place:
       - Application Gateway: 2+ instances (auto-scale)
       - App Service: Standard tier (2+ instances), auto-scale
       - SQL Database: GRS (geo-redundant), 35-day backup retention
    
  2. Security boundaries:

    ✓ Secure:
       - Private endpoints: DB, Key Vault (not on internet)
       - NSG rules: Deny by default, allow explicitly
       - HTTPS only: TLS 1.2+, no HTTP
    
    ⚠️ Risk:
       - App Gateway is public (but only accepts 443)
       - Application does not filter PII in logs (audit needed)
    
  3. Compliance markers:

    🔒 Encryption:
       - In-transit: All APIs use HTTPS
       - At-rest: Database TDE enabled, Storage CMK
    
    📊 Audit Trail:
       - All API calls → Application Insights
       - All database operations → SQL Audit
       - All storage access → Storage logging
    
    🔑 Access Control:
       - App Service: Managed identity, no secrets in config
       - Database: Azure AD authentication
       - Key Vault: RBAC (not access policies)
    

Phase 5: Create Documentation

  1. Markdown format:

    # Architecture Overview
    
    ## High-Level Diagram
    [Include Mermaid or ASCII diagram]
    
    ## Components
    - **Frontend**: App Service (P1V2, 2 instances)
    - **Database**: SQL Database (S2 tier, GRS)
    - **Cache**: Azure Cache for Redis (C1 tier, 1GB)
    
    ## Data Flow
    1. User uploads file to Blob Storage
    2. Blob trigger fires Function
    3. Function processes file, stores metadata in SQL
    4. App Service queries metadata, returns to user
    
    ## Scaling
    - Baseline: 2 instances
    - Max: 10 instances (CPU > 80%)
    
    ## Resilience
    - **Availability**: 99.95% (21 min downtime/month acceptable)
    - **RTO**: 4 hours (restore from backup)
    - **RPO**: 15 minutes (backup frequency)
    
  2. Update CI/CD documentation:

    • Add diagram links to README.md
    • Update architecture decisions in ADR (Architecture Decision Records)
    • Link to compliance controls (ISO, SOC2, HIPAA)

Output Contract

  1. High-Level Topology Summary

    • Components: Compute, storage, networking, identity
    • Data flow: Producer → Service → Consumer
    • External integrations: On-premises, partners, public APIs
  2. Detailed Architecture Diagram

    • Format: Mermaid, ASCII, or JSON
    • Include: Trust boundaries, security zones, redundancy
    • Annotate: Resource IDs, sizing, configuration
  3. Dependency & Risk Analysis

    • Single points of failure identified
    • Critical paths highlighted
    • Resilience score (redundancy, auto-scale, backup)
  4. Security & Compliance Markers

    • Encryption: At-rest, in-transit
    • Access control: Identities and permissions
    • Audit trail: Logging and monitoring
  5. Documentation Artifacts

    • Architecture document (Markdown)
    • Runbooks: Failover, scale-out, disaster recovery
    • Compliance checklist: Controls mapped to resources

Guardrails

  • Keep diagrams readable: Don't show >15 resources in one view; use layers.
  • Distinguish inferred links from confirmed: Mark assumed dependencies; verify with CLI.
  • Avoid exposing secrets: No API keys, passwords, or connection strings in diagrams.
  • Update with changes: Keep diagrams in version control (Markdown + code).
  • Audience-appropriate: Executives see 3 boxes; architects see 30+ components.
  • Link to monitoring: Annotate diagrams with alert thresholds (CPU >80%, latency >500ms).
  • Include operational runbooks: Link to failover, scaling, and incident response procedures.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Ably tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Abstract tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Abuselpdb tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Abyssale tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

manu14357 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する