autopilot-pr-merge-worker - per-PR drive-to-merge convergence loop
Writes are optional via the activation card (write: on default).
autopilot-pr-review-scheduler never spawns this skill.
The PR review scheduler never comments, labels, assigns, or
requests reviewers.
panel-review requests a review. status/accepted is the human
action flag. No accepted, no review. If status/accepted is
missing on this PR and every linked issue: remove panel-review
if present, do not comment, stop. Never assign. The scheduler
and panel stop the same way and leave no comment.
Activation card
activation_card: on. Before any PR read or GitHub write, emit
this Enter card with every field filled. Missing field -> stop.
skill: autopilot-pr-merge-worker
skill_path: <resolved directory of this SKILL.md>
mode: run
subject: microsoft/apm#<pr-number>
path: merge
intent: drive one already-selected PR
origin: unattended | actor-session
write: on | off
repo: microsoft/apm
pr: <positive integer>
invocation: agentic-workflow | actor-session
invocation_mode: composed-implementation-review
Rules:
write defaults to on when the caller omitted it.
write: off returns the filled template only. Do not comment,
add labels, remove labels, push, or request reviewers.
- If
write: on, post the one advisory comment via
autopilot-comment (source_skill: autopilot-pr-merge-worker) and fold/push inside the PR's
stated scope. Never assign. Never request the implementer as
a reviewer. Do not call gh pr comment yourself.
origin fail-closed unknown -> unattended.
- Unattended never assigns and never requests reviewers.
- One PR. Do not nest a scheduler path.
plan_first defaults to yes. Do not fold, push, or request
reviewers until Step 0.P exists. Copilot App spawn uses
kickoff_mode: plan. If the session started interactive, still
write that plan in-session and do not skip it. Wait for operator
approval when a plan-mode gate is present.
After the loop, emit this Exit receipt:
skill: autopilot-pr-merge-worker
subject: microsoft/apm#<pr-number>
path: merge
write: on | off
posted: yes | no
pushed: yes | no
reviewer_requested: no
approved: n/a
This SKILL.md is the natural-language module derived from a genesis
design packet; refactors re-run the genesis skill from that packet.
This skill is a BUILDING BLOCK, not the PR-review queue.
autopilot-pr-review-scheduler never composes it. Invoke it by
name when the caller asked to drive a PR to merge. It COMPOSES
the autopilot-pr-review-worker
skill for the advisory pass -- it does NOT re-implement panel
review.
Boundary (what this skill does and does NOT do)
DOES: take ONE PR that already exists and drive it to a terminal
landing-ready state; resolve cross-PR merge conflicts; emit the
PR-facing advisory and supersede comments; return a schema-valid
completion_return.
Does NOT: triage issues, decide which issues are worth fixing, open
the first PR for an issue, choose the batch, or maintain the
orchestrator's ground-truth table. Those are the parent
orchestrator's responsibility. If you find yourself triaging or
opening greenfield PRs, you are in the wrong skill.
How an orchestrator composes this skill
The parent scheduler, for each PR in its batch, spawns ONE
autopilot-pr-merge-worker subagent with the spawn body in
assets/worker-prompt.md.
The orchestrator passes the inputs that prompt declares (PR_NUMBER,
ISSUE_NUMBER, AUTHOR, HEAD_REPO, HEAD_BRANCH, MAINTAINER_CAN_MODIFY,
REPO_ROOT, ORIGIN, optional PANEL_PRIOR). The subagent owns the whole
convergence loop end-to-end and returns a completion_return.
After every driven PR returns ready-to-merge, the orchestrator
runs the conflict-resolution phase: probe mergeability and, on
DIRTY / BEHIND / CONFLICTING, spawn one conflict-resolution subagent
per assets/conflict-resolution-prompt.md.
The step-by-step gate procedure is in
references/mergeability-gate.md
(load it when entering that phase).
Dependency declaration (read before composing)
This skill is a same-repo LOCAL SIBLING. A consuming orchestrator
MUST declare the dependency at its own distribution surface and PROBE
for this skill before spawning. The probe is a tool call, not an
assertion from recall (A9 SUPERVISED EXECUTION; truth #2 CONTEXT
EXPLICIT):
test -f ../autopilot-pr-merge-worker/assets/worker-prompt.md \
&& test -f ../autopilot-pr-merge-worker/assets/completion-schema.json \
&& test -f ../autopilot-pr-merge-worker/scripts/owner_touch_gate.py \
&& echo "autopilot-pr-merge-worker present" \
|| echo "MISSING autopilot-pr-merge-worker - stop and ask the operator"
On a probe MISS the orchestrator stops and asks the operator rather
than re-implementing the loop inline (avoids HAND-ROLLED
HALLUCINATION and PHANTOM DEPENDENCY).
This skill itself COMPOSES autopilot-pr-review-worker.
A consuming orchestrator inherits that transitive dependency; the
spawned autopilot-pr-merge-worker subagent PROBES for it at preflight (all
load-bearing panel assets under
$REPO_ROOT/.agents/skills/autopilot-pr-review-worker/) and returns
status: blocked ONLY on a genuine asset MISS, before any checkout
(see the spawn body Step 0.0). Note: a missing skill TOOL is NOT a
miss -- in the normal subagent context the panel is executed INLINE
from its on-disk SKILL.md + schemas (Step X.1.1), which is a
first-class path, not a fallback.
Convergence loop contract (per PR)
The autopilot-pr-merge-worker subagent runs this loop (full detail in the spawn
body):
- Phase 0.P -- plan before implement (hard gate). Compare work to
date with the original task/scope (PR body + linked issue). Then
plan: fresh panel, fold in-scope findings and requirement gaps,
CI green via
agent-merge when available else
assets/ci-recovery-checklist.md. Do not checkout, fold, or
push until that plan exists (and is approved when plan-mode).
- Phase X.0 -- fetch + classify
copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot]
inline review per
assets/copilot-classification-prompt.md.
- Phase X.1 -- run the
autopilot-pr-review-worker against the PR: via the
skill tool if present, otherwise (the normal subagent case)
execute it INLINE from its on-disk SKILL.md + schemas. Both paths
produce the same single recommendation comment.
- Phase X.2 -- merge follow-ups (LEGIT Copilot + panel
recommended_followups) and apply the fold-vs-defer rubric per
assets/fold-vs-defer-rubric.md.
- Phase X.2.5 -- canonical-owner + functional-evidence gate (FAIL
CLOSED). Run
scripts/owner_touch_gate.py against
the exact base/head. It parses the single canonical owner table in
.apm/instructions/architecture.instructions.md; no LLM
self-classification may override a detected touch. Every touched
owner requires executed exact-head functional test IDs/evidence in
addition to the boundary lint and any required dual guardrail.
Schema-validate and semantically verify the version 2 completion
evidence. Missing evidence stays in the loop or returns blocked;
it is never deferred.
- Phase X.3 -- edit code; fold every FOLD item. Run the mutation-
break gate on any new regression-trap test.
- Phase X.4 -- run the lint contract until silent.
- Phase X.5 -- push (head branch; fall back to a superseding PR that
preserves authorship via commit trailers).
- Phase X.6 -- CI to green. Prefer the
agent-merge skill when it
is loaded or the prompt contains <agent_merge_state> (do not
sleep/watch inside that tick; never merge). Otherwise watch +
recover per
assets/ci-recovery-checklist.md.
- Phase X.7 -- decide terminal vs next iteration.
- Phase X.8 -- at terminal, capture
head_sha, mergeable,
mergeStateStatus, and CI status for the completion return.
Caps (hard limits)
- Outer convergence iterations: 4.
- Copilot classification rounds: 2.
- CI recovery iterations: 3.
When a cap is hit with foldable items still open, return
advisory-with-deferred with a scope-boundary note per deferred
item. Caps exist to bound non-determinism; they are not targets.
Terminal returns
The subagent returns exactly one schema-valid completion_return
matching assets/completion-schema.json:
ready-to-merge -- clean convergence; CI observed green; lint
silent; canonical-owner gate passed with schema-valid and
semantically verified architecture_evidence version 2.
advisory-with-deferred -- iteration cap hit with foldable items
remaining (rare); each deferred item carries a scope-boundary note.
superseded -- push fell back to a superseding PR (records
superseded_by).
blocked -- CI cap hit, panel assets genuinely absent (Step 0.0
probe miss -- NOT merely the skill tool being unavailable), or
unresolvable scope conflict (records a one-paragraph blocker).
The orchestrator schema-validates every return. On malformed, re-spawn
ONCE; on a second malformed return, mark the row blocked and continue.
Disciplines enforced (inherited by every consumer)
- Fold-by-default: every follow-up inside the PR's stated scope is
folded into THIS PR; only scope-crossing items are deferred, each
with a one-line boundary note.
- Mutation-break gate: every regression-trap test added is proven by
deleting the guard it protects and confirming the test fails
without it, then restoring the guard.
- Canonical-owner gate: deterministic detection parses the executable
selectors in the single canonical architecture owner table. Every
detected owner touch must map to at least one executed functional
test ID with exact command, passing evidence, and exact head SHA.
The version 2 completion contract intentionally replaces version 1
self-classified
decisions[]; terminal v1 returns are malformed and
re-spawn once. A new owner, centralization, or split-authority repair
also requires the full dual guardrail (behavioral regression test,
static boundary guard, matching test_architecture_*.py assertion,
and mutation-break evidence) plus a clean
scripts/lint-architecture-boundaries.sh. Missing evidence stays in
the loop or returns blocked; it is never deferred.
- Lint contract: the canonical ruff pair
(
uv run --extra dev ruff check src/ tests/ and
ruff format --check src/ tests/) must be silent before any push.
- CI-observed-green: terminal
ready-to-merge requires real CI
evidence, not an assumption.
- One advisory comment per PR per terminal pass, rendered from
assets/pr-comment-templates.md
and posted by
autopilot-comment.
- Authorship preservation: superseding PRs credit the original author
via commit trailers and link back.
Consequential writes cross a deterministic tool bridge
Every side effect (push, comment, PR open/close, label, CI read,
mergeability probe) goes through a deterministic CLI (gh, git,
uv run ruff) wrapped in plan + execute + verify (A9 SUPERVISED
EXECUTION). Present-state facts (CI status, mergeable, head sha) are
READ from gh/git at terminal, never asserted from recall.
Bundled assets