Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit Git configuration with one read-only baseline command, then propose confirmed, non-destructive fixes for identity, editor, and diff and merge tooling, with signing and safe.directory help only on request. Use when setting up or checking Git on a workstation.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Help the user configure Git consistently for everyday work (add, commit, fetch, pull, push) without overwriting preferred settings. Verify current values before suggesting changes, and never modify configuration without explicit confirmation.
Scope:
user.name and user.email are set.safe.directory entry is proposed only when the user reports a Git ownership or unsafe-repository error.git config --list --show-origin. It captures values and their source files. Run no other lookup, gpg, or ssh-keygen command during the audit.git config --get <key> reads and show a before and after summary.Classify each area from the baseline output only, in this order:
user.name and user.email and note each scope from its origin path. Mark a value missing when no scope sets it.commit.gpgSign, gpg.format, and user.signingkey, and classify the result for display only:
commit.gpgSign is false or unset.gpg.format and user.signingkey are present.gpg.format or user.signingkey is missing.core.editor, diff.tool, and merge.tool, and mark each missing value as a gap.safe.directory entry includes the current repository path.core.autocrlf and core.eol, and flag them only when both are unset and the user mentions cross-platform needs.&&, ;, pipes, or subshells. Idempotent commands are acceptable when the user confirms them.git config --get <key> after user confirmation rather than a batch.gpg --list-secret-keys only when signing is enabled or the user wants to enable signing and is unsure which keys exist.Adapt these after the user confirms the group; do not emit a template that no current gap or request needs.
Identity:
git config --global user.name "<user-name>"
git config --global user.email "<user-email>"
Disable misconfigured signing for now:
git config --global commit.gpgSign false
Trust a repository path after an unsafe-repository error:
git config --global --add safe.directory "<repo-path>"
Enable SSH signing with an existing key (Git 2.34 or later):
git config --global gpg.format ssh
git config --global user.signingkey "~/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub"
git config --global commit.gpgSign true
Generate and configure a GPG signing key:
gpg --full-generate-key
gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long
gpg --armor --export <KEY_ID> > public-gpg-key.asc
git config --global gpg.format openpgp
git config --global user.signingkey <KEY_ID>
git config --global commit.gpgSign true
Generate and configure an SSH signing key:
# Linux and macOS
ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -C "<user-email>" -f ~/.ssh/id_ed25519
eval "$(ssh-agent -s)"
ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_ed25519
# Windows PowerShell with the built-in OpenSSH agent
ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -C "<user-email>" -f $HOME/.ssh/id_ed25519
Start-SSHAgent
ssh-add $HOME/.ssh/id_ed25519
# Both platforms
git config --global gpg.format ssh
git config --global user.signingkey ~/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub
git config --global commit.gpgSign true
Use VS Code as the editor, diff tool, and merge tool when those values are unset:
git config --global core.editor "code --wait --new-window"
git config --global diff.tool code
git config --global difftool.code.cmd 'code -n --wait --diff "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE"'
git config --global merge.tool code
git config --global mergetool.code.cmd 'code -n --wait --merge "$REMOTE" "$LOCAL" "$BASE" "$MERGED"'
git config --global mergetool.code.trustexitcode true
git config --global mergetool.keepbackup false
Apply identity fixes? (yes/no). Treat only an explicit yes, in any letter case, as approval; any other answer declines the group.No changes needed and skip proposals except for topics the user asked about.bash block, and a confirmation question.Git setup complete. or Git setup partial; user declined some changes.Example audit table:
| Setting | Value | Scope | Status | Notes |
|----------------|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
| user.name | Jane Doe | global | ✅ | |
| user.email | (missing) | - | ❌ | required for commits |
| core.editor | code --wait --new-window | global | ✅ | |
| diff.tool | (unset) | - | ❌ | optional convenience |
| merge.tool | (unset) | - | ❌ | improves merges |
| commit.gpgSign | true | global | ✅ | signing active |
| safe.directory | (not listed) | - | ✅ | not required (no unsafe warning) |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, refresh, report, or probe an accessibility coverage matrix across criteria, surfaces, and evidence methods. Use when assessing coverage with the accessibility runtime harness and generated evidence bundle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring skill for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) supporting capture, from-planner-handoff, and adopt-template entry modes with selectable Y-Statement or MADR v4.0.0 output templates, supersession lineage, and ASR trigger evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring conventions for exploratory data analysis notebooks and analytical dashboards, covering section sequence, visualization selection, scale thresholds, caching and state, and dashboard validation budgets. Use when composing or reviewing an EDA notebook, an analytical dashboard, or a dashboard test pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture diagram authoring for cloud infrastructure and declared data catalogs. Use when rendering Azure IaC or DS_CATALOG_V1 relationships as caller-selected ASCII or Mermaid diagrams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a durable Architecture Review Record from a confirmed System Architecture Reviewer scope, evidence, pillar analysis, trade-offs, and dispositions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。