本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

pull-request

Drafts or opens a GitHub pull request, runs changed-area preflight checks, and commits validated preflight repairs, and routes Azure DevOps repositories to the backlog-management pull request protocol. Use when a user asks to prepare, create, or update a pull request on GitHub or Azure DevOps.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md12.6 KB
  • scripts/Collect-Context.ps18.7 KB
  • scripts/collect-context.sh5.1 KB
  • templates/pull-request.md413 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Pull Request

Goal

Turn the current branch into a review-ready GitHub pull request with a short, accurate description and enough targeted local evidence to catch likely CI failures without running broad validation by default.

Success means the title and body reflect the committed branch diff, the repository template is preserved when present, changed-area preflight checks pass, any authorized preflight repairs are committed under repository conventions, and an external pull request is created or updated only after one final approval.

Inputs

  • base: Base branch or ref. Default to the remote default branch without fetching.
  • draft: Whether a newly created pull request is a draft. Default to false.
  • action: prepare, create, or update. Infer from the request and default to prepare when external write intent is unclear.

Use the current checked-out branch as the head. Ask only for an input that cannot be inferred and changes the resulting pull request.

Platform Routing

When the push remote is hosted on Azure DevOps (dev.azure.com or *.visualstudio.com), or the user explicitly asks for an Azure DevOps pull request, load the backlog-management skill and follow its Azure DevOps pull request reference instead of the Flow below. When backlog-management does not resolve, report that the Azure DevOps protocol is unavailable and stop before any Azure DevOps call. Every other remote uses the GitHub flow below unchanged.

Resolve action before delegating, then carry this skill's inputs into that reference:

  • Map base to baseBranch, resolving its default as this skill does, and map draft to isDraft. An Azure DevOps input the user supplies explicitly, such as baseBranch or isDraft, takes precedence over its alias. Pass through other Azure DevOps inputs the user supplies, such as project, repository, work item IDs, area path, or iteration path.
  • prepare: produce the local pull request description through the reference's Phase 1 and Phase 2, applying its Content Sanitization Guards and Untrusted Content Boundary, then stop and return the description path. Defer destination confirmation, the autonomy tier, platform readiness, work item discovery, creation, and linking, and every Azure DevOps call to a later create.
  • create: run the reference's Mandatory Preflight, then its Required Phases with every destination, sanitization, and approval gate.
  • update: the reference creates pull requests only. Report that updating an existing Azure DevOps pull request is not supported, stop before any Azure DevOps call, and offer prepare to refresh the description for a manual update.

Flow

  1. Run the platform-matching script in scripts/ to collect branch, commit, changed-file, diff-stat, working tree, base-divergence, and template context. Preserve the initial working-tree state as the exclusion boundary for later repairs. The script uses the local remote-tracking ref and does not fetch, merge, rebase, push, or edit the branch.
  2. Stop if the repository, head branch, base ref, or merge base cannot be resolved. If the branch has no committed changes from the merge base, report that there is nothing to submit. Treat uncommitted files as excluded from the pull request and ask whether to continue only when the user's intent appears to include them. Before an external write, stop with sync guidance when the reported upstream push state is behind or diverged.
  3. Inspect the committed diff from the reported merge base. Start with changed files and diff stats, then read the diffs that determine reviewer-visible behavior. Group related files and use delegation only when a large, separable diff would materially benefit from isolated review.
  4. Derive the title from the branch and commits. Follow the repository's title convention when one exists; otherwise use a concise imperative title. Extract closing issue references only when they appear in branch or commit evidence.
  5. Build .copilot-tracking/pr/pr.md. Use the discovered repository template and preserve its heading order, comments, and manual-review checkboxes. If no template exists, copy templates/pull-request.md. Replace instructional placeholders with verified content while keeping unsupported human attestations unchecked. Apply any repository instructions that match the pull request artifact.
  6. Write for a human reviewer. Open with one plain-language summary, group the material changes by reviewer concern, and include only evidence-backed impact, compatibility, security, migration, testing, and follow-up details. Omit empty optional sections in the fallback template. Avoid a commit transcript, exhaustive file inventory, implementation chronology, and claims not supported by the diff or commits.
  7. Apply the public-output guard from the applicable content-policy instructions. Do not copy private classifications, sensitive values, or raw suspect content into the pull request body.
  8. Run the CI-confidence gate. Always run git diff --check against the committed branch diff, then match changed paths against workflow triggers and select the smallest non-mutating checks that own those areas from package scripts, path-scoped instructions, and the matching workflow steps. Prefer focused tests, syntax checks, check-mode generators, and artifact validators. Do not run full validation aggregates or CI-prefixed wrappers unless the user explicitly requests them. When a matching workflow calls a CI-prefixed wrapper, run its locally safe non-mutating component checks if no equivalent local-safe package command exists; the prefix alone is not a reason to skip them. Do not infer browser suites, service-dependent tests, security scans, or other lane-specific prerequisites from this component-check rule. Follow repository dependency bootstrap rules before dependency-backed commands.
  9. Record only checks that actually ran in the pull request. Leave hosted CI checks and human review attestations unchecked. If a required targeted check fails, keep the prepared description and stop before external creation or update. Do not change branch source unless the user asks for a fix.
  10. When the user asks to fix a local test or CI-confidence failure, treat that request as authority to commit only the resulting validated repairs. Capture the tracked and untracked working-tree baseline before editing, apply the smallest in-scope correction, and rerun every check affected by it. After the checks pass, resolve the repository's applicable commit instructions, stage only the exact repair delta created by this workflow, inspect the staged diff, and create one or more logical commits. Use Conventional Commits when the repository requires them; otherwise use its stated convention or a concise imperative subject. Never stage pre-existing edits, unrelated changes, validation logs, or the pull request body. If the repair cannot be separated safely, commit authority is unclear, or the commit fails, stop before push or pull request write. Do not amend, squash, rebase, or create an empty commit unless the user explicitly requests it.
  11. After a repair commit, rerun the context collector and refresh the committed diff, title, body, validation evidence, divergence, and push state. For prepare, return the proposed title, body path, base and head branches, repair commits, divergence, and preflight result. For create or update, also search for an open pull request with the same head and base, then present the final title, body path, target, draft state, repair commits, validation result, and upstream push state. Ask once for approval covering any needed push and the pull request write.
  12. After approval, push the current branch when needed and use the available GitHub integration to create or update the pull request. Never force-push. If an open pull request already exists, update it only when the requested action permits; otherwise return its URL instead of creating a duplicate.

Template Rules

Resolve templates in this order:

  1. A caller-specified template
  2. <repository-root>/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md or <repository-root>/.github/pull_request_template.md
  3. A single Markdown template under <repository-root>/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/
  4. docs/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md or docs/pull_request_template.md
  5. templates/pull-request.md in this skill

When multiple repository templates remain equally applicable, ask the user to choose. Repository instructions may define section-specific mapping and manual-only checkboxes; apply those rules without reintroducing a separate end-to-end workflow.

CI Confidence

The local gate predicts likely CI outcomes; it does not claim that hosted checks passed when they did not run. Use these priorities:

  1. Locally safe non-mutating checks from workflows whose path triggers match the changed files
  2. Checks explicitly required by applicable repository instructions for the changed paths
  3. Focused tests for changed executable behavior
  4. Linters, type checks, parsers, or check-mode generators for changed artifacts
  5. git diff --check for patch hygiene

Do not mark the pull request ready for external creation when a required selected check failed, dependencies needed for that check are unavailable, or generated projections known to be required are stale. If a matching workflow step cannot run locally because it needs a browser, service, credential, moderation environment, or other CI-only prerequisite, record it as pending or unavailable instead of silently omitting it. Report hosted status checks as pending after creation.

Preflight Repair Commits

Preflight remains non-mutating until the user asks to fix a reported failure. That request authorizes source correction and a repair-only commit, not staging other working-tree content. Use the initial and pre-repair working-tree snapshots to distinguish existing changes from workflow-created repairs. If the same file contains inseparable pre-existing edits, leave it unstaged and stop with the exact manual separation needed.

Commit only after the owning checks pass. Apply repository commit instructions by their normal scope and precedence, including required Conventional Commit type and scope, subject style, body, footer, signing, or verification rules. Inspect the staged name-status and patch before committing, then verify the resulting commit contains only the validated repair delta. Recollect branch context after every repair commit because commit evidence, divergence, and push state have changed.

Description Standard

Describe the final branch state in direct, neutral language. Give reviewers the context needed to understand scope and risk, with the most important change first. Use short paragraphs and flat bullets unless the repository template requires another shape. Mention files only when they help a reviewer navigate or understand an important boundary.

Check a non-human template checkbox only when direct diff or command evidence proves its statement. Never check a qualified-human review, security attestation, manual test, or hosted CI checkbox on the user's behalf.

Stop Rules

  • Stop as Blocked when branch identity, base identity, merge base, template choice, commit authority, repair-delta isolation, or write authority cannot be resolved.
  • Stop as Revise before an external write when a required targeted preflight check fails or the description has an unsupported claim. A requested repair remains Revise until affected checks pass and its repair-only commit succeeds.
  • Stop as Prepared after writing and validating the local description when no external action was requested.
  • Stop as Created or Updated only after returning the pull request URL and hosted CI state.

Final Response

Return the outcome, title, base and head, pull request body path, repair commits, targeted checks and results, skipped broad checks, material limitations, and pull request URL when one exists. Keep the response brief and do not repeat the full body.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/hve-core1,5182026年10月10日 更新

Build, refresh, report, or probe an accessibility coverage matrix across criteria, surfaces, and evidence methods. Use when assessing coverage with the accessibility runtime harness and generated evidence bundle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/hve-core1,5182026年10月10日 更新

Authoring skill for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) supporting capture, from-planner-handoff, and adopt-template entry modes with selectable Y-Statement or MADR v4.0.0 output templates, supersession lineage, and ASR trigger evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/hve-core1,5182026年10月10日 更新

Authoring conventions for exploratory data analysis notebooks and analytical dashboards, covering section sequence, visualization selection, scale thresholds, caching and state, and dashboard validation budgets. Use when composing or reviewing an EDA notebook, an analytical dashboard, or a dashboard test pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/hve-core1,5182026年10月10日 更新

Architecture diagram authoring for cloud infrastructure and declared data catalogs. Use when rendering Azure IaC or DS_CATALOG_V1 relationships as caller-selected ASCII or Mermaid diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/hve-core1,5182026年10月10日 更新

Create a durable Architecture Review Record from a confirmed System Architecture Reviewer scope, evidence, pillar analysis, trade-offs, and dispositions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/hve-core1,5182026年10月10日 更新

microsoft のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する