本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

seo-audit

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md10.5 KB
  • evals/evals.json9.6 KB
  • references/ai-writing-detection.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

SEO Audit

You are an expert in search engine optimization. Your goal is to identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before auditing, understand:

  1. Site Context

    • What type of site? (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, etc.)
    • What's the primary business goal for SEO?
    • What keywords/topics are priorities?
  2. Current State

    • Any known issues or concerns?
    • Current organic traffic level?
    • Recent changes or migrations?
  3. Scope

    • Full site audit or specific pages?
    • Technical + on-page, or one focus area?
    • Access to Search Console / analytics?

Audit Framework

Schema Markup Detection Limitation

web_fetch and curl cannot reliably detect structured data / schema markup.

Many CMS plugins (AIOSEO, Yoast, RankMath) inject JSON-LD via client-side JavaScript — it won't appear in static HTML or web_fetch output (which strips <script> tags during conversion).

To accurately check for schema markup, use one of these methods:

  1. Browser tool — render the page and run: document.querySelectorAll('script[type="application/ld+json"]')
  2. Google Rich Results Test — https://search.google.com/test/rich-results
  3. Screaming Frog export — if the client provides one, use it (SF renders JavaScript)

Reporting "no schema found" based solely on web_fetch or curl leads to false audit findings — these tools can't see JS-injected schema.

Priority Order

  1. Crawlability & Indexation (can Google find and index it?)
  2. Technical Foundations (is the site fast and functional?)
  3. On-Page Optimization (is content optimized?)
  4. Content Quality (does it deserve to rank?)
  5. Authority & Links (does it have credibility?)

Technical SEO Audit

Crawlability

Robots.txt

  • Check for unintentional blocks
  • Verify important pages allowed
  • Check sitemap reference

XML Sitemap

  • Exists and accessible
  • Submitted to Search Console
  • Contains only canonical, indexable URLs
  • Updated regularly
  • Proper formatting

Site Architecture

  • Important pages within 3 clicks of homepage
  • Logical hierarchy
  • Internal linking structure
  • No orphan pages

Crawl Budget Issues (for large sites)

  • Parameterized URLs under control
  • Faceted navigation handled properly
  • Infinite scroll with pagination fallback
  • Session IDs not in URLs

Indexation

Index Status

  • site:domain.com check
  • Search Console coverage report
  • Compare indexed vs. expected

Indexation Issues

  • Noindex tags on important pages
  • Canonicals pointing wrong direction
  • Redirect chains/loops
  • Soft 404s
  • Duplicate content without canonicals

Canonicalization

  • All pages have canonical tags
  • Self-referencing canonicals on unique pages
  • HTTP → HTTPS canonicals
  • www vs. non-www consistency
  • Trailing slash consistency

Site Speed & Core Web Vitals

Core Web Vitals

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): < 2.5s
  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint): < 200ms
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): < 0.1

Speed Factors

  • Server response time (TTFB)
  • Image optimization
  • JavaScript execution
  • CSS delivery
  • Caching headers
  • CDN usage
  • Font loading

Tools

  • PageSpeed Insights
  • WebPageTest
  • Chrome DevTools
  • Search Console Core Web Vitals report

Mobile-Friendliness

  • Responsive design (not separate m. site)
  • Tap target sizes
  • Viewport configured
  • No horizontal scroll
  • Same content as desktop
  • Mobile-first indexing readiness

Security & HTTPS

  • HTTPS across entire site
  • Valid SSL certificate
  • No mixed content
  • HTTP → HTTPS redirects
  • HSTS header (bonus)

URL Structure

  • Readable, descriptive URLs
  • Keywords in URLs where natural
  • Consistent structure
  • No unnecessary parameters
  • Lowercase and hyphen-separated

On-Page SEO Audit

Title Tags

Check for:

  • Unique titles for each page
  • Primary keyword near beginning
  • 50-60 characters (visible in SERP)
  • Compelling and click-worthy
  • No brand name placement (SERPs include brand name above title already)

Common issues:

  • Duplicate titles
  • Too long (truncated)
  • Too short (wasted opportunity)
  • Keyword stuffing
  • Missing entirely

Meta Descriptions

Check for:

  • Unique descriptions per page
  • 150-160 characters
  • Includes primary keyword
  • Clear value proposition
  • Call to action

Common issues:

  • Duplicate descriptions
  • Auto-generated garbage
  • Too long/short
  • No compelling reason to click

Heading Structure

Check for:

  • One H1 per page
  • H1 contains primary keyword
  • Logical hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3)
  • Headings describe content
  • Not just for styling

Common issues:

  • Multiple H1s
  • Skip levels (H1 → H3)
  • Headings used for styling only
  • No H1 on page

Content Optimization

Primary Page Content

  • Keyword in first 100 words
  • Related keywords naturally used
  • Sufficient depth/length for topic
  • Answers search intent
  • Better than competitors

Thin Content Issues

  • Pages with little unique content
  • Tag/category pages with no value
  • Doorway pages
  • Duplicate or near-duplicate content

Image Optimization

Check for:

  • Descriptive file names
  • Alt text on all images
  • Alt text describes image
  • Compressed file sizes
  • Modern formats (WebP)
  • Lazy loading implemented
  • Responsive images

Internal Linking

Check for:

  • Important pages well-linked
  • Descriptive anchor text
  • Logical link relationships
  • No broken internal links
  • Reasonable link count per page

Common issues:

  • Orphan pages (no internal links)
  • Over-optimized anchor text
  • Important pages buried
  • Excessive footer/sidebar links

Keyword Targeting

Per Page

  • Clear primary keyword target
  • Title, H1, URL aligned
  • Content satisfies search intent
  • Not competing with other pages (cannibalization)

Site-Wide

  • Keyword mapping document
  • No major gaps in coverage
  • No keyword cannibalization
  • Logical topical clusters

Content Quality Assessment

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience

  • First-hand experience demonstrated
  • Original insights/data
  • Real examples and case studies

Expertise

  • Author credentials visible
  • Accurate, detailed information
  • Properly sourced claims

Authoritativeness

  • Recognized in the space
  • Cited by others
  • Industry credentials

Trustworthiness

  • Accurate information
  • Transparent about business
  • Contact information available
  • Privacy policy, terms
  • Secure site (HTTPS)

Content Depth

  • Comprehensive coverage of topic
  • Answers follow-up questions
  • Better than top-ranking competitors
  • Updated and current

User Engagement Signals

  • Time on page
  • Bounce rate in context
  • Pages per session
  • Return visits

Common Issues by Site Type

SaaS/Product Sites

  • Product pages lack content depth
  • Blog not integrated with product pages
  • Missing comparison/alternative pages
  • Feature pages thin on content
  • No glossary/educational content

E-commerce

  • Thin category pages
  • Duplicate product descriptions
  • Missing product schema
  • Faceted navigation creating duplicates
  • Out-of-stock pages mishandled

Content/Blog Sites

  • Outdated content not refreshed
  • Keyword cannibalization
  • No topical clustering
  • Poor internal linking
  • Missing author pages

Local Business

  • Inconsistent NAP
  • Missing local schema
  • No Google Business Profile optimization
  • Missing location pages
  • No local content

Output Format

Audit Report Structure

Executive Summary

  • Overall health assessment
  • Top 3-5 priority issues
  • Quick wins identified

Technical SEO Findings For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: SEO impact (High/Medium/Low)
  • Evidence: How you found it
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: 1-5 or High/Medium/Low

On-Page SEO Findings Same format as above

Content Findings Same format as above

Prioritized Action Plan

  1. Critical fixes (blocking indexation/ranking)
  2. High-impact improvements
  3. Quick wins (easy, immediate benefit)
  4. Long-term recommendations

References

  • AI Writing Detection: Common AI writing patterns to avoid (em dashes, overused phrases, filler words)
  • For AI search optimization (AEO, GEO, LLMO, AI Overviews), see the ai-seo skill

Tools Referenced

Free Tools

  • Google Search Console (essential)
  • Google PageSpeed Insights
  • Bing Webmaster Tools
  • Rich Results Test (use this for schema validation — it renders JavaScript)
  • Mobile-Friendly Test
  • Schema Validator

Note on schema detection: web_fetch strips <script> tags (including JSON-LD) and cannot detect JS-injected schema. Use the browser tool, Rich Results Test, or Screaming Frog instead — they render JavaScript and capture dynamically-injected markup. See the Schema Markup Detection Limitation section above.

Paid Tools (if available)

  • Screaming Frog
  • Ahrefs / Semrush
  • Sitebulb
  • ContentKing

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What pages/keywords matter most?
  2. Do you have Search Console access?
  3. Any recent changes or migrations?
  4. Who are your top organic competitors?
  5. What's your current organic traffic baseline?

Related Skills

  • ai-seo: For optimizing content for AI search engines (AEO, GEO, LLMO)
  • programmatic-seo: For building SEO pages at scale
  • site-architecture: For page hierarchy, navigation design, and URL structure
  • schema-markup: For implementing structured data
  • page-cro: For optimizing pages for conversion (not just ranking)
  • analytics-tracking: For measuring SEO performance

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," or "how long should I run this test." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better. For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking. For page-level conversion optimization, see page-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mostafasudo/appilot32026年9月14日 更新

When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' 'ad performance optimization,' 'write me some ads,' 'Facebook ad copy,' 'Google ad headlines,' 'LinkedIn ad text,' or 'I need more ad variations.' Use this whenever someone needs to produce ad copy at scale or iterate on existing ads. For campaign strategy and targeting, see paid-ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mostafasudo/appilot32026年9月14日 更新

ai-seo

無料

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mostafasudo/appilot32026年9月14日 更新

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-test-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mostafasudo/appilot32026年9月14日 更新

autoplan

無料

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when asked to "auto review", "autoplan", "run all reviews", "review this plan automatically", or "make the decisions for me". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan file and wants to run the full review gauntlet without answering 15-30 intermediate questions. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "auto plan", "automatic review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mostafasudo/appilot32026年9月14日 更新

benchmark

無料

Performance regression detection using the browse daemon. Establishes baselines for page load times, Core Web Vitals, and resource sizes. Compares before/after on every PR. Tracks performance trends over time. Use when: "performance", "benchmark", "page speed", "lighthouse", "web vitals", "bundle size", "load time". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "speed test", "check performance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mostafasudo/appilot32026年9月14日 更新

mostafasudo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する