本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

developing-openrig

Use when changing OpenRig's own source in a clone of the openrig repository: finding which package or file owns a behaviour, choosing which tests to run, testing a change without disturbing the OpenRig daemon your own session runs on, judging whether a diff touches a high-risk area, or preparing a pull request. Not for operating rigs (openrig-skills) or designing rig topologies.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Developing OpenRig

This skill is a map to the other maps. Each one is incomplete and may be stale: where a map and the code disagree, the code is right, and fixing the map is a welcome contribution.

First: which OpenRig are you in?

If you are an agent running inside OpenRig, two different OpenRigs are in play:

  • The installed one runs your session. rig --version and rig daemon status describe it.
  • The checkout is what you're changing. git rev-parse HEAD describes it.

Restarting the installed daemon does not run your checkout, and stopping it stops the agents running on it, including you. Test your change with the repo's own harnesses, which start a private daemon and tmux server (see "Test it" below), not by restarting the daemon you live in.

Find your way

You want to knowReadHow much to trust it
What OpenRig can already do, before you decide something is missingrig context get onboarding-width/public-what-you-can-do.md; in this checkout, packages/daemon/context-packs-src/onboarding-width/public-what-you-can-do.md (the installed copy can differ)The capability map; check it before proposing a new command or calling a gap a defect
Whether a rig command already existsrig --help: the full command list, before you decide a command is missingThe running binary; read the whole list, not only the command you expected
Whether a problem is already knownThe "Known problems to compare against" section of docs/reference/help.mdLists known issues by symptom; check an issue's current status before relying on it
Whether a feature is already plannedROADMAP.mdCheck it before proposing a feature
How the packages fit, the request path, where to add a command, route, migration, adapter, skill, context pack or scenarioARCHITECTURE.mdChecked against the commit it names; counts come with the command to refresh them
Whether your change touches a high-risk area, what depends on it, what broke there beforedocs/as-built/arteries.mdIncomplete by design: absence from it doesn't make a change safe
What to run before you push, and what each layer can and can't provedocs/as-built/test-layers.mdChecked against the commit it names
The exact behaviour of a rig commandrig <command> --help on the running binary, then packages/cli/src/commands/The binary and the code win over any document
A subsystem in depthdocs/as-built/Each module names the commit it was last checked against in last-verified-against-source; compare that marker with git log before relying on it
Rig spec, agent spec and other user-facing referencedocs/reference/Ships to every user; if you find drift, fix it there
Which shipped skill covers a taskskills/_canonical/core/openrig-skills/SKILL.mdThe index of the skills that ship with OpenRig
How to open a good pull request, and what review looks likeCONTRIBUTING.mdCurrent

If none of these answers your question, search the code before inventing an answer. A missing map is worth an issue.

Before you change an artery

If your diff touches anything in arteries.md (message delivery, launch and resume, the queue, rig identity, skill projection, process observation, migrations, restore):

  1. Read the artery row: what depends on it, and the past regressions listed there.
  2. Describe the downstream effect in your pull request, not just the diff.
  3. Add or extend a stub-agent scenario, or say precisely why the stub can't exercise it and what you ran instead.

Test it

The short version is npm run build, npm run lint, npm test. test-layers.md has the full ladder, including the stub-agent scenarios, which run the real CLI, daemon, tmux and SQLite with scripted agents and no model cost.

  • The scenario runner starts its own daemon and tmux server and drops your session's TMUX and daemon variables, so it won't touch the daemon your session runs on.
  • A stub proves OpenRig's own plumbing, not how Claude Code or Codex behave. Say which you exercised.

How we judge changes

OpenRig is a coordination layer for a trusted environment: it should help agents and people keep work flowing.

  • A change that removes friction, or makes state more truthful, is usually welcome.
  • OpenRig runs on agents working in context with tools. Before adding code for a behaviour, ask whether an agent with the right instructions and today's commands could do it. A skill or a page of guidance is often the better change.
    • Where to look: the capability map above, and the agent-operated-workflows skill, which ships in the openrig-core plugin (packages/daemon/assets/plugins/openrig-core/skills/agent-operated-workflows/SKILL.md).
  • A change that adds a refusal, a prompt or a required step needs the concrete case in CONTRIBUTING.md: who is harmed, how, and what it costs everyone else.
  • One concern per pull request. Keep the diff reviewable in one sitting.

When the map is wrong

Fix it in the same pull request, or open an issue. Update a document's last-verified-against-source marker only when you have actually checked it against that commit.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,8242026年10月11日 更新

Use when designing, building, operating, or diagnosing an ongoing application whose live backend or control loop includes OpenRig agents, including applications with a Markdown, YAML, or JSON agent control plane or a thin surface over specialist agent roles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,8242026年10月11日 更新

Use when a bounded real-world procedure has a deterministic happy path but brownfield, variable, or partially knowable state; when an operation must resume from verified evidence; or when deciding whether agent judgment or ordinary code should own a procedure's control loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,8242026年10月11日 更新

Use when creating, refreshing, packaging, inspecting, promoting, or deprecating a named per-seat starting point — Agent Starter manifest authoring, the 6-state lifecycle (captured → named → inspectable → used → promoted → deprecated), provenance honesty, and refusal rules. NOT a VM image; a managed starting point composed from agent role + startup context + optional native session source + provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,8242026年10月11日 更新

Use when designing or auditing how an agent becomes useful after launch — AGENTS.md overlays, role files, skills, rig specs, workflow specs, startup checklists, refocus messages, "rig context" surface. Covers the 4 failure modes that make startup context fail (old rig spec misses current operating mode; current agents never told about new guidance; startup file as dumping ground; orchestrator transmits implementation without preserving product intent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,8242026年10月11日 更新

Use before launching a team during agent-guided setup, or when a user asks to configure OpenRig command permissions, reduce repeated native approval prompts, or apply a selected rig/seat permission policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,8242026年10月11日 更新

mvschwarz のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する