本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

oversight-team

Use when you are a seat on the oversight pod (a standing monitor-mode rig that keeps OTHER rigs healthy), configuring or running the drift detectors, or choosing whether to intervene vs escalate. Covers the pull-not-poll posture, the v0 detectors (premature-park, process-drift, off-task, token-burn), the intervention ladder (orchestrator-ping -> refocus -> human escalation), and the cheap+deep model economics. NOT for orchestrating your OWN rig (orchestration-team) and NOT the intervention primitive mechanics (watchdog).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Oversight Team

You are on the oversight pod — a standing rig (agent-managed infrastructure, like the skills-architect pattern: agents + scripts + an SOP owning a function full-time) whose job is to keep other rigs healthy. You catch the unproductive patterns rigs drift into — premature parking, process-drift, off-task wandering, token burn — early, and correct them with the lightest touch that works. Monitor mode: idle until a flag fires; never hyper-poll.

Use this when

  • You are a seat running in monitor mode on the oversight pod.
  • Configuring or running the v0 drift detectors over the fleet.
  • Deciding whether to intervene (orchestrator-ping / refocus) or escalate (human).

Don't use this when

  • You are orchestrating your own rig — that's orchestration-team. Oversight watches across rigs; it does not run them.
  • You need the intervention primitive mechanics (the wake / refocus / alignment-checkpoint stack, rig watchdog policies, message shape) — that's watchdog.
  • A single stuck seat needs recovery — the owning orchestrator or watchdog handles that.

The posture — pull, never poll (load-bearing, and self-referential)

Monitor mode means idle until a flag fires, then wake and check — not continuous watching. Continuous rig capture / vigilant-observation loops are the exact anti-pattern that has burned entire model accounts: an over-observing watcher is expensive and produces nothing. The oversight seat must model the discipline it enforces — the token-burn detector below exists precisely because seats fell into vigilant loops, so a hyper-polling monitor would be the failure it hunts. Cheap models read the large swaths; the expensive watcher acts on aggregated summaries, never the raw firehose.

The v0 detectors (scripted + cheap-model-summarized)

Cheap, evidence-based checks — each confirms a pattern from durable evidence before anyone acts:

  • Premature park — an in-progress qitem with an idle owner and no handoff. Pull the transcript and confirm the turn actually ended without passing the ball (not merely quiet).
  • Process-drift — the ship-nothing pattern: commits that produce no shipped change, heavy test iteration, very large/verbose qitems, endless deliberation. Detectable from git history
    • queue sizes. (This is process winning over product; correct it toward shipping.)
  • Off-task drift — a cheap-model summary over a large activity swath (JSONL transcripts, the stream, git log) answering one question: "is this rig on task?" If a pod drifts too long, intervene.
  • Token burn / hypermonitoring — a seat consuming unusually — top-N consumers → capture and inspect for the vigilant-loop pattern. Telemetry surface caveat: the v0 detector uses point-in-time consumption polling; per-agent token telemetry OVER TIME is a later upgrade — do NOT assume it exists, and verify the available telemetry against your current version before wiring a detector to it.

Interventions — least-disruptive first

  1. Orchestrator-ping — nudge the pod's own orchestrator to realign. They run their rig; you prompt, you do not seize.
  2. The refocus primitive — watchdog's Refocus level: a reactive north-star reminder that fires only on actual drift, re-centers role / approved workstream / stop conditions, and does NOT interrupt valid work or turn into a fresh approval gate. Use watchdog for the message shape and the cadence discipline.
  3. Escalate to the human — via the existing human path / notifications, per the active mode. Reserve for what an agent-level nudge cannot fix.

Do not (the discipline)

  • Don't hyper-poll / vigilant-loop — you become the token burn you hunt.
  • Don't seize another rig's work — ping its orchestrator; oversight corrects patterns, it does not take over.
  • Don't fire refocus on an active, on-task owner — that's bureaucracy theater (a watchdog failure mode).
  • Don't intervene on a glance — confirm the pattern from evidence (transcript / git / queue) before acting. A false alarm costs the fleet trust and tokens.
  • Don't fire liveness / premature-park flags on a seat in an announced SWAP WINDOW. A seat mid-handover looks idle/parked to the detectors. The executing party pre-announces (seat + expected window) at swap start — honor it as a suppression window until the handover receipt lands (receipts arrive only at swap end, so waiting on the receipt alone still misfires on a long swap). See retiring-and-inheriting-a-seat.

Cheap + deep model economics

Cheap models do the routine reading (transcripts, logs, stream) and aggregate intelligent summaries; an expensive watcher decides on those summaries. This is why per-agent model assignment matters — you can run the reading far more often without blowing out accounts. Design the pod so the deep model never touches the raw firehose.

See also

  • watchdog — the intervention primitive (wake / refocus / alignment-checkpoint) this SOP drives; refocus lives there.
  • refocus — the drift doctrine watchdog operationalizes.
  • orchestration-team — running your own rig (complementary; oversight watches across rigs).
  • human-in-the-loop / messaging-the-human — the escalation path and how to address a human.
  • retiring-and-inheriting-a-seat — a context-threshold detector can fire a planned seat handover (sibling oversight signal).

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,9312026年10月12日 更新

Use when designing, building, operating, or diagnosing an ongoing application whose live backend or control loop includes OpenRig agents, including applications with a Markdown, YAML, or JSON agent control plane or a thin surface over specialist agent roles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,9312026年10月12日 更新

Use when a bounded real-world procedure has a deterministic happy path but brownfield, variable, or partially knowable state; when an operation must resume from verified evidence; or when deciding whether agent judgment or ordinary code should own a procedure's control loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,9312026年10月12日 更新

Use when creating, refreshing, packaging, inspecting, promoting, or deprecating a named per-seat starting point — Agent Starter manifest authoring, the 6-state lifecycle (captured → named → inspectable → used → promoted → deprecated), provenance honesty, and refusal rules. NOT a VM image; a managed starting point composed from agent role + startup context + optional native session source + provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,9312026年10月12日 更新

Use when designing or auditing how an agent becomes useful after launch — AGENTS.md overlays, role files, skills, rig specs, workflow specs, startup checklists, refocus messages, "rig context" surface. Covers the 4 failure modes that make startup context fail (old rig spec misses current operating mode; current agents never told about new guidance; startup file as dumping ground; orchestrator transmits implementation without preserving product intent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,9312026年10月12日 更新

Use before launching a team during agent-guided setup, or when a user asks to configure OpenRig command permissions, reduce repeated native approval prompts, or apply a selected rig/seat permission policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mvschwarz/openrig6,9312026年10月12日 更新

mvschwarz のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する