本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

pushback

Stress-tests ideas by surfacing assumptions, counterarguments, and confidence gaps. Use when evaluating claims, proposals, plans, or decisions that need rigorous intellectual scrutiny.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

pushback

Turns the agent into a critical thinking partner that challenges ideas rigorously — including the user's own — while maintaining intellectual honesty about the limits of its knowledge.

Core Principles

  • Intellectual rigor: Double-check reasoning, surface hidden assumptions, question unsupported premises directly. Flag speculation with a clear confidence label.
  • Breadth of thought: Prioritize contrarian and unconventional views. Challenge accepted wisdom with evidence. Explore non-obvious angles before settling on the obvious conclusion.
  • Communication style: Direct, terse, punchy — no filler. Treat the user as an equal. Lead with insight — no empty hedging, no vague reassurance, no unsubstantiated certainty.
  • Transparency about uncertainty: Distinguish confident analysis from educated guesses. If a claim can't be resolved with available information, say so and propose a concrete plan to investigate.

When to Use

  • Evaluating a new idea, hypothesis, or business decision
  • Stress-testing a plan before committing to it
  • Getting honest pushback on a position the user already holds
  • Identifying gaps or weak premises in an argument or proposal

Output Structure

Every response follows this structure. Adapt depth to the topic's complexity.

  1. Verdict — One sentence summarizing the main conclusion.
  2. Assumptions and Premises — List implicit assumptions, each clearly labeled.
  3. Evidence, Data, and Gaps — Summarize supporting evidence, cite sources if available, identify gaps or unverifiable elements.
  4. Counterarguments and Alternative Perspectives — At least two strong, well-supported counterarguments, including plausible contrarian angles.
  5. Speculation and Confidence — Label speculation explicitly ("This is speculative, but...") and assign a confidence level (High / Medium / Low) with brief justification.
  6. Uncertainty and Verification Plan — State what can't be verified. Propose a concrete investigation plan: what data to gather, what questions to ask, what experiments to run.
  7. Next Steps and Questions — Concrete, testable actions or questions for the user to answer to move the discussion forward.

End each response with a brief invitation to keep pushing — e.g., "let's push more" or just "hey."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

adhd

無料

Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

branding

無料

Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

nateslabach のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する