本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

mk:decision-framework

Operational decision frameworks: triage, escalation, case management, billing ops. Use for 'how to handle X cases', 'build triage', 'escalation protocol'.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(9)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • references/communication-patterns.md3.8 KB
  • references/decision-tree-template.md2.4 KB
  • references/edge-case-discovery.md2.5 KB
  • references/escalation-protocol-template.md3.0 KB
  • references/examples/example-billing-ops.md4.0 KB
  • references/examples/example-incident-response.md4.8 KB
  • references/examples/example-returns-triage.md2.9 KB
  • references/weighted-scoring-guide.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Decision Framework Builder

Structures expert judgment into repeatable, auditable decision systems for recurring high-stakes choices.

When to Use

Activate when:

  • User asks "how should we handle X cases?" or "build triage system"
  • Designing escalation protocols or case management workflows
  • Billing ops, support, returns, incident response, compliance decisions
  • Any domain with classified decision types and routing rules

Phase Anchor

Phase: 1 (Plan) — Produces a decision framework document. Handoff: Developer agent implements the decision logic in code.

Failure Handling

  • Domain unclear: Ask user for 3 example cases. Derive taxonomy from examples.
  • No domain expert available: Flag output as needs-expert-input. Mark uncertain classifications explicitly.

Process (7 Steps)

Step 1: Identify Decision Type

Clarify the recurring decision being structured. What is decided? Who decides? How often?

Step 2: Build Classification Taxonomy

Load references/decision-tree-template.md. Map every case type into mutually exclusive categories. Aim for 3-7 top-level buckets — too few collapses distinct cases, too many creates lookup overhead.

Step 3: Define Sequential Decision Rules

Order rules by: Safety > Compliance > Economics > Speed. Never let speed override safety. Document the reasoning for each rule's position in the sequence.

Step 4: Create Weighted Scoring

Load references/weighted-scoring-guide.md. Define 3-5 factors with weights summing to 100%. Calibrate against 3 historical cases.

Step 5: Define Escalation Protocol

Load references/escalation-protocol-template.md. Map 4 escalation levels: Expert → Manager → Director → VP. Each level must have authority scope, timeline, and escalation trigger.

Step 6: Add Communication Templates

Load references/communication-patterns.md. Select tone per relationship state: Routine / Significant / Crisis. Customize placeholders.

Step 7: Document Edge Cases

Load references/edge-case-discovery.md. Collect edge cases from team ("what surprised you?"). Document each as: situation → why obvious approach fails → correct approach.

References

FilePurpose
references/decision-tree-template.mdDomain-agnostic taxonomy + rules template
references/escalation-protocol-template.md4-level escalation with authority/timeline/triggers
references/weighted-scoring-guide.mdMulti-factor scoring + calibration method
references/communication-patterns.md3 tones with example templates
references/edge-case-discovery.mdEdge case collection and documentation process
references/examples/example-returns-triage.mdWorked example: returns processing
references/examples/example-billing-ops.mdWorked example: billing operations
references/examples/example-incident-response.mdWorked example: security incidents

Output Format

Produce a decision framework document with:

  1. Domain Summary — what is being decided, frequency, stakes
  2. Classification Taxonomy — case types and definitions
  3. Decision Rules — ordered Safety → Compliance → Economics → Speed
  4. Scoring Matrix — weighted factors with calibration notes
  5. Escalation Protocol — 4-level table
  6. Communication Templates — one per tone
  7. Edge Case Playbook — 2-3 sentence entries per known exception

Gotchas

  • Do not merge case types that have different decision rules — keep taxonomy granular
  • Scoring weights must sum to 100%; calibrate on real cases, not hypothetical ones
  • Escalation timelines must be specific (hours, not "soon")
  • Edge cases are not exceptions to document and ignore — they are the most important cases to get right

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill to generate well-branded interfaces and assets for MeowKit (AI Agent Toolkit for Claude Code), either for production or throwaway prototypes/mocks/etc. Contains essential design guidelines, colors, type, fonts, assets, and UI kit components for prototyping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

mk-advise

無料

Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until confirmed, then give a verdict with trade-offs and a checklist. Not for options or debate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Browser automation CLI for agents: navigate, click/fill, screenshot, extract data, test apps, Electron/Slack, cloud browsers. NOT for the user's real Chrome profile/cookies (mk:chrome-profile).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Detects the right agent and complexity tier at Phase 0 orient; runs first in every workflow. NOT for runtime agent routing inside a single skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Angular v20+ patterns: components, signals, services, forms, routing, HTTP, testing, SSR. Auto-activates on .ts files in Angular projects (angular.json detected).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Design and review durable REST, GraphQL, RPC, or event API contracts: shape, compatibility, pagination, error semantics. Discovers existing consumers first. Not implementation, schema, or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

ngocsangyem のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する