本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

peer-review-template

Structured peer review for analytical work. Use when reviewing teammates' analysis, providing constructive feedback, or establishing analysis quality standards.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md1.9 KB
  • assets/peer_review_template.md1.8 KB
  • assets/review_response_template.md1.6 KB
  • references/analytical_rigor_checklist.md2.9 KB
  • references/code_review_for_analysis.md3.3 KB
  • references/peer_review_framework.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

When to use

Before any analysis that will influence a significant decision is delivered to stakeholders. Peer review should be part of the standard delivery checklist for: dashboards going into production, reports used for strategic decisions, A/B test conclusions, and any analysis that will be cited externally.

Process

  1. Agree scope of review — clarify with the author what kind of review is needed: logic check, statistical validity, code review, or presentation clarity. Use references/peer_review_framework.md to set expectations.
  2. Review analytical rigour — work through references/analytical_rigor_checklist.md: are the question and method aligned? Are assumptions valid? Is the conclusion supported by the data?
  3. Review code or SQL — if the analysis involves code, apply references/code_review_for_analysis.md: reproducibility, correctness, readability, and performance.
  4. Write feedback — use the feedback structure in assets/peer_review_template.md: must-fix issues, should-fix suggestions, and optional improvements. Be specific; "this is unclear" is not actionable.
  5. Author responds — the author addresses each point and notes disposition (fixed / accepted as-is with rationale / deferred); use assets/review_response_template.md.
  6. Close the review — reviewer confirms must-fix items are resolved and signs off; document the outcome in assets/peer_review_template.md.

Inputs the skill needs

  • Analysis output to review (notebook, report, dashboard spec, or SQL)
  • Review scope agreed with author
  • Reviewer name and role

Output

  • Completed review with categorised feedback (peer_review_template.md)
  • Author response log (review_response_template.md)
  • Sign-off confirmation

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Rigorous A/B test statistical analysis. Use when analyzing experiment results, calculating statistical significance, checking for sample ratio mismatch, or validating test design before launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4712026年9月25日 更新

Track and document analytical assumptions and decisions. Use when making analytical choices, documenting trade-offs, ensuring transparency, or creating audit trails for analytical work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4712026年9月25日 更新

Structured, reproducible analysis documentation. Use when documenting analysis findings, creating analysis notebooks, ensuring reproducibility, or building analysis archives for future reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4712026年9月25日 更新

Structure analysis approach before starting work. Use when receiving new analysis requests, breaking down complex questions into steps, or planning iterative analysis workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4712026年9月25日 更新

Pre-delivery quality assurance for analysis work. Use when reviewing analysis before sharing with stakeholders, checking for completeness, validating assumptions, or ensuring clarity of recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4712026年9月25日 更新

Post-analysis learning and process improvement. Use when completing major analysis projects, documenting lessons learned, or improving team analytical practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4712026年9月25日 更新

nimrodfisher のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する