accounts
無料Manage multiple Claude Code accounts: add, list, check, launch, and install shell aliases for 10+ isolated CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR profiles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured work: multi-phase tasks, feature builds, planning, objective loops, hill climbing.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Five modes for structured multi-phase work. Match the request, follow that mode's instructions.
| Request pattern | Mode |
|---|---|
| Feature design/plan/implement/validate/release, end-to-end | Feature Lifecycle |
| Write spec, define requirements, create plan, interview, pause/resume | Planning |
| Keep working until, iterate until done, drive to done | Objective Loop |
| Make faster, speed up, reduce latency, profile, hill climb | Hill Climb |
| All other structured workflows: review, debug, refactor, research, create, explore, upgrade | Ad-Hoc Workflow |
Phase-gated workflow: DESIGN > PLAN > IMPLEMENT > VALIDATE > RELEASE. Each phase must pass its gate before the next begins.
If .feature/ exists, check state: python3 ~/.claude/scripts/feature-state.py status.
Route to the indicated phase.
If no feature state exists, determine entry from intent:
Load the phase reference, then follow it exactly:
| Phase | Reference | Produces |
|---|---|---|
| DESIGN | references/fl-design.md | design.md |
| PLAN | references/fl-plan.md | Wave-ordered task list |
| IMPLEMENT | references/fl-implement.md | Code changes |
| VALIDATE | references/fl-validate.md | Quality gate report |
| RELEASE | references/fl-release.md | Merged PR |
| End-to-end | references/fl-pipeline.md | Full lifecycle |
| State conventions | references/fl-shared.md | -- |
| Error recovery | references/fl-error-handling.md | -- |
State operations use python3 ~/.claude/scripts/feature-state.py only.
Never manipulate state files directly.
Spec writing, plan creation, interviews, ambiguity triage, and session pause/resume. Planning owns specs and saved plans; execution goes through subagent-driven-development or workflow dispatch.
| Signal | Reference |
|---|---|
| Write spec, user stories, define requirements, scope, acceptance criteria | references/pl-spec.md |
| Discuss ambiguities, resolve gray areas, pre-planning discussion | references/pl-pre-plan.md |
| Interview me, depth-first review, "not sure", "where do I start", "poke holes" | references/pl-depth-first-interview.md |
| Implicit ambiguity or unclear implementation choices | references/pl-ambiguity-triage.md |
| Another person holds needed facts or approval | references/pl-human-source-elicitation.md |
| Observation can settle a disputed choice | references/pl-empirical-prototype.md |
| Phase or session transition near | references/pl-context-boundary.md |
| Create plan, task plan, file-backed planning | references/pl-plan-files.md |
| Check plan, validate plan, pre-execution check | references/pl-check.md |
| List plans, show plan, complete plan, manage plans | references/pl-manage.md |
| Pause, save progress, handoff, stopping for now | references/pl-pause.md |
| Resume, continue, pick up where I left off | references/pl-resume.md |
For interviews, batch independent questions into frontier rounds. Ask dependent questions sequentially. Include a recommendation per question.
Iterate-until-verified-done loop. A user states an objective with verifiable done-criteria; each iteration routes one /do cycle, verifies by executing the criteria, and reschedules until verified-done or budget-stop.
Gather from the request: objective statement, DONE-CRITERIA (verifiable checks), iteration budget (default 5), NOT-DONE-YET guardrails (what may never be done to satisfy a criterion).
DONE-CRITERIA types: command (preferred -- deterministic command with expected
exit code/output) or rubric (only when no mechanical check exists -- frozen
at SPEC time, graded by a fresh-context agent).
Write .objective/<slug>/state.md from references/ol-state-file.md. Wakeups
resume from the state file, never conversation memory.
Plan the smallest next step. Route through /do: classify -> route -> dispatch agents -> evaluate. The loop dispatches exclusively through /do -- never edit inline.
Run every done-criterion check. A worker's "passes" claim never substitutes for re-running.
command: run it, paste exit code and output into iteration log.rubric: dispatch fresh-context sub-agent (did NOT produce the work) with
artifact + rubric only. Returns PASS/FAIL with cited evidence.All pass -> final report, STOP. Any unmet -> Phase 5.
Criteria-gaming guard: a criterion may never be satisfied by weakening a hook, gate, test, or safety control. Stop and report the conflict if that is the only visible path.
All pass: stop. Unmet + iterations remain: update state file, call
ScheduleWakeup (delay 270s for active polling, 1200s+ for idle work).
Budget exhausted: honest NOT-DONE report with per-criterion status.
Metric-driven optimization loop. One number moves; everything else stays fixed. Each iteration: hypothesis -> one change -> correctness floor -> re-measure -> accept or revert.
| Field | Required | Default |
|---|---|---|
| METRIC (one number, units, direction) | yes | -- |
| MEASURE (deterministic command) | yes | -- |
| TARGET (value that ends the loop) | yes | -- |
| FLOOR (correctness gate commands, must exit 0) | yes | -- |
| FIXTURE (pinned dataset/workload) | yes | -- |
| Variance tolerance | no | 2x baseline spread |
| Iteration budget | no | 8 |
| Plateau threshold K | no | 3 |
One METRIC per loop. Two numbers with a trade-off: promote one to the FLOOR.
Load references/hc-domain-playbooks.md for pre-filled SPEC blocks per domain
(frame rate, API latency, CI time, bundle size, memory, token cost).
Run MEASURE N times (N >= 5, N >= 10 for wall-clock). Record median and spread. If spread >= target improvement: STOP -- harness too noisy. Report noise sources and offer to stabilize first.
Locate the cost before changing anything. Load references/hc-profiling-tools.md
for per-domain tooling. Guessing at hot spots is the dominant failure mode.
State one hypothesis targeting the profiled hot spot. Make one change. Run FLOOR commands -- revert immediately if any fail.
Run MEASURE N times. Compare median to baseline. Accept only if delta > variance
tolerance. Update ledger (references/hc-ledger.md). If accepted, new baseline.
Target reached: final report. K consecutive non-improving iterations: plateau stop. Budget exhausted: report what worked and what remains.
For structured multi-phase work that does not fit the four modes above. Identify the workflow from the table, load its reference, follow its phases exactly.
Ask first: does this need a multi-agent workflow? Skip the workflow when:
single-file mechanical edit (use quick), one agent satisfies the request
(direct dispatch), lookup/status/count (direct agent). Escalate only when the
request has independent subtasks, needs orthogonal verification, or names
"comprehensive / thorough / adversarial / tournament."
| Pattern | What it does |
|---|---|
| Classify-and-act | Route by type up front; or classify-at-end |
| Fan-out-and-synthesize | Independent agents in parallel, barrier, one synthesizer |
| Adversarial verification | Executor builds, fresh skeptic refutes |
| Generate-and-filter | Over-generate candidates, gate keeps survivors |
| Tournament | N agents attempt same task; pairwise judges pick winner per round |
| Loop-until-done | Repeat until hard completion test passes |
| Quarantine | Read-only triage agent for untrusted content; separate privileged acting agent |
Load the reference for the matched workflow. references/... paths resolve
under ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}.
| Category | Workflow | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | Comprehensive multi-wave | references/comprehensive-review.md |
| Debugging | Evidence-based diagnosis | references/systematic-debugging.md |
| Refactoring | Safe refactoring with test gates | references/systematic-refactoring.md |
| Research | Formal research with source gates | references/research-pipeline.md |
| Research | Research to article | references/research-to-article.md |
| Content | Article evaluation | references/article-evaluation-pipeline.md |
| Content | De-AI content | references/de-ai-pipeline.md |
| Content | Documentation | references/doc-pipeline.md |
| Exploration | Codebase exploration | references/explore-pipeline.md |
| Exploration | Multi-perspective analysis | references/do-perspectives.md |
| Creation | Skill creation | references/skill-creation-pipeline.md |
| Creation | Hook development | references/hook-development-pipeline.md |
| Creation | MCP server | references/mcp-pipeline-builder.md |
| Creation | Pipeline scaffolding | references/pipeline-scaffolder.md |
| Creation | Domain research | references/domain-research.md |
| Creation | Chain composition | references/chain-composer.md |
| Creation | Auto-pipeline generation | references/auto-pipeline.md |
| Upgrade | Agent/skill upgrade | references/agent-upgrade.md |
| Upgrade | System upgrade | references/system-upgrade.md |
| Upgrade | Toolkit improvement | references/toolkit-improvement.md |
| Testing | Pipeline test runner | references/pipeline-test-runner.md |
| Testing | Pipeline retro | references/pipeline-retro.md |
| GitHub | Profile rules extraction | references/github-profile-rules.md |
| Orchestration | Task orchestration | references/workflow-orchestrator.md |
| Orchestration | DAG composition | references/dag-composition-patterns.md |
| Orchestration | Compatibility matrix | references/dag-compatibility-matrix.md |
| Orchestration | Common DAG patterns | references/dag-skill-patterns.md |
| Orchestration | DAG examples | references/dag-orchestration-examples.md |
| Orchestration | DAG advanced | references/dag-orchestration-advanced.md |
| Orchestration | Feedback loop | references/feedback-loop-construction.md |
"Workflow" is the canonical term. "Pipeline" is the retained legacy alias --
kept for back-compat in routing keys, meta.name exports, and
pipeline-index.json. Use "workflow" in new prose; do not rename code
identifiers.
| Error | Response |
|---|---|
| Mode ambiguous | Ask the user to clarify intent |
| Phase mismatch | Report current state, suggest correct next phase |
| Missing artifact | Route back to previous phase |
| Noisy harness (hill-climb) | Stop; report spread vs target improvement |
| Budget exhausted | Honest NOT-DONE report with per-criterion status |
| State file missing on wakeup | Report and stop; ask user to restate objective |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Manage multiple Claude Code accounts: add, list, check, launch, and install shell aliases for 10+ isolated CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR profiles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve architecture across modules by deepening interfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessment: read-only inspection, codebase overview, value analysis, health checks, ADR consultation, decision analysis, multi-perspective critique.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Background memory consolidation — overnight review, merge, and injection payload for memory files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Jev-driven browser automation: Jev picks operations, programs execute, a text model writes field values only when Jev cannot pick one from the goal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, compose, integrate, and improve programs that call Jev, TypeSafe's System One judgment model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。