Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Documentation collapse anti-patterns - detection rules, bad examples, and remediation strategies for type-mixing violations
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Documentation collapse = types merge inappropriately, serving no audience well.
Description: Tutorial explains "why" extensively | Detection: explanation >20% | Fix: extract to separate doc, link back
Description: How-to teaches basics first | Detection: teaching fundamentals before steps | Fix: link to tutorial, assume baseline
Description: Reference includes conversational prose | Detection: prose paragraphs in entries | Fix: move to explanation doc, keep factual
Description: Explanation ends with "do this" steps | Detection: step-by-step in explanation | Fix: move steps to how-to, link
Description: Single doc tries all four types | Detection: 3+ quadrants in one doc | Fix: split with clear boundaries
Flag collapse when:
20% content from adjacent quadrant | Two user needs served simultaneously | Ambiguous user journey stage
# Getting Started
If you need to deploy to production, follow these steps...
Problem: Assumes user knows what "deploy to production" means. A tutorial should assume nothing.
# How to Configure Authentication
First, let's understand what authentication is. Authentication is...
Problem: Should assume user knows what authentication is. Link to a tutorial instead.
## login(username, password)
This is probably the most important function you'll use...
Problem: Reference should be factual, not opinionated. Remove "probably the most important" editorializing.
# Why We Use Microservices
... therefore, you should: 1. Create a service, 2. Deploy it...
Problem: Steps belong in a how-to guide. The explanation should end with reasoning and link to the how-to for action.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。