Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mom Test questioning toolkit, JTBD analysis, interview conduct, assumption testing framework, and hypothesis design
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Understand if problem is real and worth solving.
Map the job-to-be-done and desired outcomes.
Challenge beliefs and uncover truth.
Distinguish interest from commitment.
Understand impact and urgency.
Do: Ask about past specifics | Open, non-directive questions | Seek commitment not praise | Keep informal | 80% listening | Talk about their life first
Avoid: Future behavior questions | Leading questions | Accepting compliments as validation | Talking >20% | Mentioning idea before understanding problem | Formal settings
Challenge when: belief without evidence | prediction about future | negative feedback dismissed | skipping to solution | single data point relied on
Tone: curious and supportive, not confrontational -- goal is truth-seeking.
| Category | Core Question |
|---|---|
| Value | Will customers want this? |
| Usability | Can customers use this? |
| Feasibility | Can we build this? |
| Viability | Does this work for our business? |
| Factor | Weight | Low (1) | Medium (2) | High (3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact if wrong | 3 | Minor adjustment | Significant rework | Solution fails |
| Uncertainty | 2 | Have data | Mixed signals | Speculation |
| Ease of testing | 1 | Days, low cost | Weeks, moderate | Months, high cost |
Risk Score = (Impact x 3) + (Uncertainty x 2) + (Ease x 1)
| Priority | Score | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Test first | > 12 | Immediate |
| Test soon | 8-12 | Schedule |
| Test later | < 8 | Backlog |
We believe [doing X] for [user type] will achieve [outcome].
We will know this is TRUE when we see [measurable signal].
We will know this is FALSE when we see [counter-signal or absence of signal].
| Category | Methods |
|---|---|
| Value | Landing page, Fake door, Mom Test interviews |
| Usability | Prototype testing, 5-second tests, Task completion |
| Feasibility | Spike, Technical prototype, Expert review |
| Viability | Lean Canvas review, Stakeholder interviews |
| Result | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Proven | >80% meet success criteria | Proceed |
| Disproven | <20% meet criteria | Pivot or kill |
| Inconclusive | 20-80% | Increase sample, try different method, segment |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。