Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review system architecture, simplify boundaries, or compare interface designs from repository evidence
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Load skills/blocks/engineering-method-selection.md from the installed plugin
and apply only the methods relevant to this task. Preserve this entry point's
execution contract and output format. Read referenced skills as instructions;
do not invoke the current command recursively or add provider calls from a seat.
Run this method on the current host. A routine architecture review makes zero additional provider dispatches.
--peer-review, an explicit independent-review
request, or an existing risk policy may add one bounded external reviewer through
Octopus routing. Report incomplete independent coverage if that reviewer cannot
read the source or does not return a grounded contribution.
Read and apply skills/blocks/architecture-simplification.md from the installed
plugin root. Pin the source revision and inspect implementation, callers, tests,
recent churn, and failure behavior before recommending a boundary.
For a single simplification, produce one evidence-backed interface. For a design choice, produce two alternatives from the same immutable requirements:
Label two host-generated drafts as correlated alternatives from one model. If an independent reviewer is authorized, send it the same source and requirements but not Draft A before its first response. Transport diversity does not prove model family diversity. Unknown family means unknown independence.
Return Evidence, Caller contract, Proposed interface, Migration, Test impact, and Decision. The decision is keep, simplify, or investigate.
simplify requires exact source evidence and a concrete caller example. A design
review never authorizes an automatic refactor.
When the host exposes language-server tools, use document symbols, workspace symbols, definitions, and references to confirm module boundaries and caller relationships before proposing an interface. Treat LSP results as an index: verify consequential claims against source and tests, and fall back to repository search when the language server is unavailable or incomplete.
Adapted from codebase-design and DESIGN-IT-TWICE in mattpocock/skills at
commit 3cca18b368ae95cdbdebbff572ccafa662551015 under the MIT License. See
THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI requirements scoping using available external providers (Double Diamond Define phase). Priority triggers: octo define, octo scope, co-define, co-scope. DO NOT use for implementation, research, review/validation, or built-in commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using available external providers (Double Diamond Deliver phase)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI implementation using available external providers (Double Diamond Develop phase). DO NOT use for simple code edits, reading/reviewing code, built-in commands, or trivial single-file changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。