Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug a reproducible symptom with a bounded feedback loop and original-scenario verification
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Read skills/blocks/engineering-method-selection.md from the installed plugin
for review admission. Natural-language requests and --peer-review share that
policy. Honor host-only requests; risk alone does not authorize paid usage.
Run the investigation on the current host. Routine debugging makes zero
additional provider dispatches. Use a bounded external reviewer only for
--peer-review, an explicit independent-review request, or an existing risk
policy.
Read and apply skills/blocks/debug-feedback-loop.md from the installed plugin
root.
Start with the user's observable symptom. Reproduce it, retain its failure signature while minimizing the scenario, test one named hypothesis at a time, and verify both the minimal reproduction and the original scenario after the fix. Do not treat a nearby passing helper test as proof.
For a race, use a synchronization barrier and a fixed run or time budget. For an
unavailable production dependency, return inconclusive with the missing
evidence. Remove temporary instrumentation before completion and preserve a
stable reproduction as a regression test.
The final record is data, not an executable queue. Store commands as argument arrays and never evaluate provider-authored text.
Use a 3-Strike Rule for failed fixes. After each failure, return to the evidence and test a materially different hypothesis. After two consecutive failures, a strategy rotation is mandatory: reconsider the root cause, the reproduction, and whether the test encodes the intended behavior. Do not attempt a 4th fix without explicit user approval.
Anti-rationalization check: “Should work now” means run the reproduction and the original scenario. Confidence is not verification.
For multi-attempt debugging, report a WTF score using the defaults in
~/.claude-octopus/loop-config.conf: +15% per revert and +20% for touching
unrelated files. If the score exceeds 20%, STOP and show the evidence before
continuing. Include the score with every retry, for example:
Fix attempt 2 | Self-regulation: 15% (1 revert, 0 unrelated files)
When the symptom is localized to one user-approved module, resolve that module to a physical directory before editing and activate the existing freeze guard:
_OCTO_SESSION_ID="${CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID:-${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID:-}}"
if [[ -z "$_OCTO_SESSION_ID" ]]; then
printf 'Freeze activation requires a shared Claude session ID; stop before editing.\n' >&2
exit 1
fi
freeze_dir="$(cd "<module-directory>" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)" || exit 1
_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE="/tmp/octopus-freeze-${_OCTO_SESSION_ID}.txt"
if [[ -e "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" || -L "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" ]]; then
if [[ -f "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" && ! -L "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" &&
-O "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" && -s "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" ]]; then
printf 'Freeze already active; left unchanged.\n'
else
printf 'Unsafe or empty freeze state; stop and inspect it before retrying.\n' >&2
exit 1
fi
else
(umask 077; python3 - "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" "$freeze_dir" <<'PYFREEZE'
import os
import sys
try:
fd = os.open(sys.argv[1], os.O_WRONLY | os.O_CREAT | os.O_EXCL, 0o600)
with os.fdopen(fd, "w", encoding="utf-8") as state:
state.write(sys.argv[2] + "\n")
except OSError:
raise SystemExit("Freeze activation failed; inspect the state before retrying.")
PYFREEZE
) || exit 1
fi
Activation requires a nonempty CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID or CLAUDE_SESSION_ID.
Both activation and freeze enforcement require Python 3. Existing empty,
symlinked or nonregular state is refused for manual inspection; active state
contents are never read or printed by this activation check. Exclusive creation
refuses a state path introduced after the check.
A freeze that is already active (from /octo:freeze, /octo:guard or an
earlier workflow) stays as it is: do not replace it, and do not remove it when
debugging ends. Its current boundary still blocks edits outside that scope.
To target another module, consciously unfreeze and freeze the new scope before
editing. Do not auto-freeze when the root cause is still unknown, the
reproduction spans modules, or the user opted out. After original-scenario
verification, run /octo:unfreeze only if this workflow created the freeze and
the state file still names the directory it set; a different directory means
the user froze again since, so leave that freeze in place.
Adapted from diagnosing-bugs in mattpocock/skills at commit
3cca18b368ae95cdbdebbff572ccafa662551015 under the MIT License. See
THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI requirements scoping using available external providers (Double Diamond Define phase). Priority triggers: octo define, octo scope, co-define, co-scope. DO NOT use for implementation, research, review/validation, or built-in commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using available external providers (Double Diamond Deliver phase)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI implementation using available external providers (Double Diamond Develop phase). DO NOT use for simple code edits, reading/reviewing code, built-in commands, or trivial single-file changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。