本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

skill-debug

Debug a reproducible symptom with a bounded feedback loop and original-scenario verification

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml166 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than /octo:* slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, see skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.

Debugging

Read skills/blocks/engineering-method-selection.md from the installed plugin for review admission. Natural-language requests and --peer-review share that policy. Honor host-only requests; risk alone does not authorize paid usage.

Run the investigation on the current host. Routine debugging makes zero additional provider dispatches. Use a bounded external reviewer only for --peer-review, an explicit independent-review request, or an existing risk policy.

<HARD-GATE> DO NOT CHANGE PRODUCTION BEHAVIOR BEFORE REPRODUCING THE SYMPTOM AND TESTING A NAMED ROOT-CAUSE HYPOTHESIS. </HARD-GATE>

Read and apply skills/blocks/debug-feedback-loop.md from the installed plugin root.

Start with the user's observable symptom. Reproduce it, retain its failure signature while minimizing the scenario, test one named hypothesis at a time, and verify both the minimal reproduction and the original scenario after the fix. Do not treat a nearby passing helper test as proof.

For a race, use a synchronization barrier and a fixed run or time budget. For an unavailable production dependency, return inconclusive with the missing evidence. Remove temporary instrumentation before completion and preserve a stable reproduction as a regression test.

The final record is data, not an executable queue. Store commands as argument arrays and never evaluate provider-authored text.

Bounded recovery and strategy rotation

Use a 3-Strike Rule for failed fixes. After each failure, return to the evidence and test a materially different hypothesis. After two consecutive failures, a strategy rotation is mandatory: reconsider the root cause, the reproduction, and whether the test encodes the intended behavior. Do not attempt a 4th fix without explicit user approval.

Anti-rationalization check: “Should work now” means run the reproduction and the original scenario. Confidence is not verification.

For multi-attempt debugging, report a WTF score using the defaults in ~/.claude-octopus/loop-config.conf: +15% per revert and +20% for touching unrelated files. If the score exceeds 20%, STOP and show the evidence before continuing. Include the score with every retry, for example:

Fix attempt 2 | Self-regulation: 15% (1 revert, 0 unrelated files)

Scoped freeze guard

When the symptom is localized to one user-approved module, resolve that module to a physical directory before editing and activate the existing freeze guard:

_OCTO_SESSION_ID="${CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID:-${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID:-}}"
if [[ -z "$_OCTO_SESSION_ID" ]]; then
    printf 'Freeze activation requires a shared Claude session ID; stop before editing.\n' >&2
    exit 1
fi
freeze_dir="$(cd "<module-directory>" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)" || exit 1
_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE="/tmp/octopus-freeze-${_OCTO_SESSION_ID}.txt"
if [[ -e "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" || -L "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" ]]; then
    if [[ -f "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" && ! -L "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" &&
          -O "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" && -s "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" ]]; then
        printf 'Freeze already active; left unchanged.\n'
    else
        printf 'Unsafe or empty freeze state; stop and inspect it before retrying.\n' >&2
        exit 1
    fi
else
    (umask 077; python3 - "$_OCTO_FREEZE_FILE" "$freeze_dir" <<'PYFREEZE'
import os
import sys

try:
    fd = os.open(sys.argv[1], os.O_WRONLY | os.O_CREAT | os.O_EXCL, 0o600)
    with os.fdopen(fd, "w", encoding="utf-8") as state:
        state.write(sys.argv[2] + "\n")
except OSError:
    raise SystemExit("Freeze activation failed; inspect the state before retrying.")
PYFREEZE
    ) || exit 1
fi

Activation requires a nonempty CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID or CLAUDE_SESSION_ID. Both activation and freeze enforcement require Python 3. Existing empty, symlinked or nonregular state is refused for manual inspection; active state contents are never read or printed by this activation check. Exclusive creation refuses a state path introduced after the check.

A freeze that is already active (from /octo:freeze, /octo:guard or an earlier workflow) stays as it is: do not replace it, and do not remove it when debugging ends. Its current boundary still blocks edits outside that scope. To target another module, consciously unfreeze and freeze the new scope before editing. Do not auto-freeze when the root cause is still unknown, the reproduction spans modules, or the user opted out. After original-scenario verification, run /octo:unfreeze only if this workflow created the freeze and the state file still names the directory it set; a different directory means the user froze again since, so leave that freeze in place.

Adapted from diagnosing-bugs in mattpocock/skills at commit 3cca18b368ae95cdbdebbff572ccafa662551015 under the MIT License. See THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2002026年10月10日 更新

Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2002026年10月10日 更新

Multi-AI requirements scoping using available external providers (Double Diamond Define phase). Priority triggers: octo define, octo scope, co-define, co-scope. DO NOT use for implementation, research, review/validation, or built-in commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2002026年10月10日 更新

Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using available external providers (Double Diamond Deliver phase)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2002026年10月10日 更新

Multi-AI implementation using available external providers (Double Diamond Develop phase). DO NOT use for simple code edits, reading/reviewing code, built-in commands, or trivial single-file changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2002026年10月10日 更新

Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2002026年10月10日 更新

nyldn のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する