Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a behavior change with observed red, minimal green, and measured test consolidation
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Read skills/blocks/engineering-method-selection.md from the installed plugin
for review admission. Natural-language requests and --peer-review share that
policy. Honor host-only requests; risk alone does not authorize paid usage.
Run the red, green, and refactor cycle on the current host. Routine TDD makes
zero additional provider dispatches. Use one external reviewer only when the
user passes --peer-review, explicitly requests independent review, or an
existing risk policy requires it. Explicit debate, council, and multi-model
commands retain their own execution contracts.
Do not change production behavior until a focused test fails for the expected reason. Existing implementation outside the requested change remains intact.
If a test passes before implementation, it is not red evidence. If it errors due to fixture or syntax problems, repair the test until it fails on the missing behavior.
Do not equate similar assertions with duplicate guarantees. Keep separate OS,
security, cancellation, and integration boundaries. For every removed test,
record old_test, behavior, replacement, mutant, red_observed,
baseline_ms, candidate_ms, and reason. The retained test must kill the
named mutant at the intended caller boundary.
After one warm-up, measure five isolated runs and report every sample and the median. Review a slowdown only when it exceeds both 20 percent and 100 ms.
Completion requires observed red and green evidence, affected-suite results, and the consolidation ledger when tests were removed. A missing reviewer is reported as incomplete review, never simulated.
If the same test remains red after two implementation attempts, stop and recheck the test boundary, fixture, and expected behavior. The strategy-rotation hook is a signal to try a fundamentally different hypothesis, not another variation of the same patch.
Adapted from DEEPENING in mattpocock/skills at commit
3cca18b368ae95cdbdebbff572ccafa662551015 under the MIT License. See
THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI requirements scoping using available external providers (Double Diamond Define phase). Priority triggers: octo define, octo scope, co-define, co-scope. DO NOT use for implementation, research, review/validation, or built-in commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using available external providers (Double Diamond Deliver phase)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI implementation using available external providers (Double Diamond Develop phase). DO NOT use for simple code edits, reading/reviewing code, built-in commands, or trivial single-file changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。