Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling for reliable async tests
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.
Core principle: Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.
digraph when_to_use {
"Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
"Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
"Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
"Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];
"Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
"Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
"Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}
Use when:
setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())Don't use when:
// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();
// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();
| Scenario | Pattern |
|---|---|
| Wait for event | waitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE')) |
| Wait for state | waitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready') |
| Wait for count | waitFor(() => items.length >= 5) |
| Wait for file | waitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path)) |
| Complex condition | waitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10) |
Generic polling function:
async function waitFor<T>(
condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
description: string,
timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
const startTime = Date.now();
while (true) {
const result = condition();
if (result) return result;
if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
}
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
}
}
See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (waitForEvent, waitForEventCount, waitForEventMatch) from actual debugging session.
❌ Polling too fast: setTimeout(check, 1) - wastes CPU
✅ Fix: Poll every 10ms
❌ No timeout: Loop forever if condition never met ✅ Fix: Always include timeout with clear error
❌ Stale data: Cache state before loop ✅ Fix: Call getter inside loop for fresh data
// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200)); // Then: wait for timed behavior
// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified
Requirements:
From debugging session (2025-10-03):
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force unrelated concepts together to discover emergent properties - "What if we treated X like Y?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use multiple Claude agents to investigate and fix independent problems concurrently
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute detailed plans in batches with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。