Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Angular framework expert including components, services, RxJS, templates, and testing
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
@Input() values are read-only from the child's perspective; communicate back to the parent via @Output() events or shared services.takeUntilDestroyed(), the async pipe, or DestroyRef; uncleaned subscriptions are the #1 Angular memory leak vector.OnPush change detection for non-trivial components — default change detection triggers on every event everywhere in the tree; OnPush triggers only on input reference changes.any type assertions to bypass TypeScript — type-unsafe code causes runtime errors that strict mode would catch at compile time; use proper types or generics instead.| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Using NgModule for new components | Legacy pattern deprecated since Angular 17 | Use standalone components |
| Direct DOM manipulation with ElementRef | Breaks SSR and web worker compatibility | Use Angular renderer or signals |
| Not unsubscribing from Observables | Memory leaks accumulate across component lifecycle | Use async pipe or takeUntilDestroyed() |
| Default change detection on data-heavy components | Unnecessary full-tree checks on every event | Use OnPush change detection strategy |
| Deeply nested imperative subscriptions | Hard to test, lifecycle leak risk | Prefer async pipe in template |
Using any type to bypass compiler | Runtime errors that TypeScript would prevent | Use proper types or unknown with type guards |
This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。