本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

auto-recall

Use when you need semantic retrieval from perpetual memory at query time. Parses query intent, searches vector store, ranks by relevance and recency, and injects context. Complements memory-search.cjs with the perpetual_memory LanceDB table.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md6.7 KB
  • commands/auto-recall.md111 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs175 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs281 B
  • references/research-requirements.md621 B
  • rules/auto-recall.md365 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json496 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json336 B
  • scripts/main.cjs4.5 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md298 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Auto-Recall

Overview

Semantic retrieval from the perpetual memory vector store at query time. Parses query intent, searches the perpetual_memory LanceDB table, ranks results by relevance and recency, and returns structured context for injection into agent prompts.

Core principle: Every agent should be able to recall any past interaction instantly by meaning, not by filename or keyword. Auto-recall is the read side of the perpetual memory architecture.

When to Use

  • At the start of any task to recall related past decisions and learnings
  • When debugging to find previously encountered similar issues
  • When an agent needs context about how a similar problem was solved before
  • When building prompts that benefit from historical context
  • When checking if a pattern or approach was tried previously

Do NOT use for:

  • Searching code (use pnpm search:code instead)
  • Searching markdown memory files (use memory-search.cjs for that)
  • Real-time interaction monitoring (use perpetual-memory skill for writes)

Relationship to Existing Tools

ToolSearchesUse For
pnpm search:codeCode files (BM25+semantic)Finding code patterns
memory-search.cjsMarkdown memory filesSearching learnings/decisions/issues
auto-recallperpetual_memory tableRecalling past interactions

Auto-recall is complementary -- it searches a different index (the perpetual memory vector store) that contains auto-captured interaction summaries rather than manually-written markdown entries.

Workflow

Step 1: Parse Query Intent

Before searching, classify the query intent:

Intent TypeQuery PatternSearch Strategy
Decision"Why did we choose X", "What was decided"Filter: category=decision
Issue"Have we seen this error before"Filter: category=issue
Pattern"How do we usually handle X"Filter: category=pattern
Learning"What did we learn about X"Filter: category=learning
GeneralAny other queryNo category filter

Step 2: Search Vector Store

# Basic semantic search
node .claude/tools/cli/auto-embed.cjs --query "how does the routing guard handle Write operations" --limit 10

# Or via the skill script
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "JWT refresh token pattern" --limit 5

Step 3: Rank by Relevance + Recency

Results are ranked by cosine similarity from LanceDB. For time-sensitive queries, apply a recency boost:

final_score = similarity * 0.7 + recency_score * 0.3

where recency_score = max(0, 1 - (days_since_creation / 30))

This ensures recent interactions are slightly preferred when similarity is close.

Step 4: Inject Context

Format retrieved memories for agent prompt injection:

## Recalled Context (from perpetual memory)

1. [decision] (sim=0.87, 2d ago, agent=architect)
   Chose JWT RS256 over HS256 for key rotation support. ADR-045.

2. [learning] (sim=0.82, 5d ago, agent=developer)
   Token refresh requires httpOnly cookies to prevent XSS.

3. [issue] (sim=0.74, 1d ago, agent=qa)
   JWT expiry not propagated to frontend. Workaround in auth.middleware.ts:47.

CLI Reference

# Semantic query
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "routing guard behavior"

# Query with category filter
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "auth decision" --category decision

# Query with limit
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "memory system" --limit 5

# Query with recency boost
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "recent changes" --recency-boost

# Output as JSON
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "search" --json

Agent Integration Pattern

Agents should invoke auto-recall at the start of significant tasks:

// At task start, recall relevant context
Skill({ skill: 'auto-recall' });

// Then query for task-relevant history
// node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "<task description>" --limit 5

This provides agents with historical context about similar past work, preventing repeated mistakes and leveraging prior decisions.

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER use auto-recall as a replacement for memory-search.cjs -- they search different indexes and are complementary.
  2. ALWAYS limit results to avoid context bloat -- default to 5-10 results, never more than 20.
  3. NEVER inject recalled context without relevance filtering -- results below 0.5 similarity are noise.
  4. ALWAYS include metadata (category, agent, timestamp) in recalled context for traceability.
  5. NEVER block on auto-recall failure -- if the perpetual memory table is unavailable, proceed without it.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Using auto-recall for code searchWrong index; code is in BM25/semantic code indexUse pnpm search:code for code discovery
Injecting all results into contextLow-similarity results pollute the promptFilter to similarity > 0.5 before injecting
Blocking task on recall failurePerpetual memory is a bonus, not a dependencyGracefully degrade: proceed without recall
Recalling without specifying limitUnbounded results consume too many tokensAlways set --limit (default: 10)
Trusting recall over fresh code analysisPast context may be outdatedUse recall as starting context, verify current

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

oimiragieo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する