本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

code-style-validator

Programmatic code style validation using AST analysis. Complements (not replaces) code-style rules by providing automated checking and instant feedback.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md9.4 KB
  • commands/code-style-validator.md120 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs890 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs886 B
  • references/research-requirements.md443 B
  • rules/code-style-validator.md388 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json277 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json638 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1.7 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md194 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Installation

No separate download: the skill runs the in-repo tool .claude/tools/cli/security-lint.cjs.

  • Ensure Node.js (v18+) is installed: nodejs.org or winget install OpenJS.NodeJS.LTS (Windows), brew install node (macOS).
  • From the project root, the script is invoked automatically; no extra install steps.

Cheat Sheet & Best Practices

AST-based validation: Use ESLint (or equivalent) with selectors/patterns; rules listen for specific node types. Prefer existing community rules before writing custom ones; custom rules need meta (type, fixable, schema) and create.

Process: Check naming (camelCase/PascalCase/snake_case), indentation, import order, function/class structure, comment style. Run in pre-commit and CI; provide auto-fix where possible.

Hacks: Use --fix for auto-fixable rules; combine with security-lint for policy. Define rule metadata clearly for docs and tooling. Use AST selectors for precise pattern matching (node type, attributes, child/sibling).

Certifications & Training

ESLint: Use in project, custom rules, selectors. No cert; skill data: AST-based validation, pre-commit/CI, auto-fix, naming/indent/imports.

Hooks & Workflows

Suggested hooks: Pre-commit: run security-lint (skill script) or ESLint; block commit on failure. Use with developer (secondary), code-reviewer (secondary), qa (CI).

Workflows: Use with code-reviewer (secondary), developer (secondary). Flow: before commit or in CI → run validator → fix or block. See code-review-workflow.md, validation hooks.

<identity> Code Style Validator - Programmatically validates code style using AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) analysis. Complements code-style rules by providing automated checking. </identity> <capabilities> - Before committing code - In pre-commit hooks - During code review - In CI/CD pipelines - To enforce consistent code style </capabilities> <instructions> <execution_process>

Step 1: Identify Code Style Patterns

Analyze the codebase to identify style patterns:

  • Naming conventions (camelCase, PascalCase, snake_case)
  • Indentation style (spaces vs tabs, width)
  • Import organization
  • Function/class structure
  • Comment style

Step 2: AST-Based Validation

Use language-specific AST parsers:

TypeScript/JavaScript: </execution_process> </instructions>

<examples> <code_example> **TypeScript/JavaScript AST Validation**:
const ts = require('typescript');
const fs = require('fs');

function validateTypeScriptFile(filePath) {
  const sourceCode = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
  const sourceFile = ts.createSourceFile(filePath, sourceCode, ts.ScriptTarget.Latest, true);

  const issues = [];

  // Validate naming conventions
  ts.forEachChild(sourceFile, node => {
    if (ts.isFunctionDeclaration(node) && node.name) {
      if (!/^[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$/.test(node.name.text)) {
        issues.push({
          line: sourceFile.getLineAndCharacterOfPosition(node.name.getStart()).line + 1,
          message: `Function name "${node.name.text}" should be camelCase`,
        });
      }
    }
  });

  return issues;
}

</code_example>

<code_example> Python AST Validation:

import ast
import re

def validate_python_file(file_path):
    with open(file_path, 'r') as f:
        source_code = f.read()

    tree = ast.parse(source_code)
    issues = []

    for node in ast.walk(tree):
        if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef):
            if not re.match(r'^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*$', node.name):
                issues.append({
                    'line': node.lineno,
                    'message': f'Function name "{node.name}" should be snake_case'
                })

    return issues

</code_example>

<code_example> Style Checks:

Naming Conventions:

  • Variables: camelCase (JS/TS) or snake_case (Python)
  • Functions: camelCase (JS/TS) or snake_case (Python)
  • Classes: PascalCase
  • Constants: UPPER_CASE
  • Private: prefix with underscore

Formatting:

  • Indentation: 2 spaces (JS/TS) or 4 spaces (Python)
  • Line length: 88-100 characters
  • Trailing commas: Yes (JS/TS)
  • Semicolons: Consistent usage

Structure:

  • Import order: external, internal, relative
  • Function length: < 50 lines
  • File organization: exports, helpers, types </code_example>

<code_example> Usage Examples (Template - implement validator first):

Validate Single File:

# After implementing your validator:
node validate-code-style.js src/components/Button.tsx

Validate Directory:

# After implementing your validator:
node validate-code-style.js src/components/

Output Format:

{
  "file": "src/components/Button.tsx",
  "valid": false,
  "issues": [
    {
      "line": 15,
      "column": 10,
      "rule": "naming-convention",
      "message": "Variable 'UserData' should be camelCase: 'userData'",
      "severity": "error"
    },
    {
      "line": 23,
      "column": 5,
      "rule": "indentation",
      "message": "Expected 2 spaces, found 4",
      "severity": "warning"
    }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "total": 2,
    "errors": 1,
    "warnings": 1
  }
}

</code_example>

<code_example> Pre-commit Hook (Template - implement validator first):

#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
changed_files=$(git diff --cached --name-only --diff-filter=ACM | grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py)$')

for file in $changed_files; do
  # Replace with your actual validator path
  if ! node validate-code-style.js "$file"; then
    echo "Code style validation failed for $file"
    exit 1
  fi
done

</code_example>

<code_example> CI/CD Integration (Template - implement validator first):

# .github/workflows/code-style.yml
- name: Validate code style
  run: |
    # Replace with your actual validator path
    node validate-code-style.js src/
    if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
      echo "Code style validation failed"
      exit 1
    fi

</code_example> </examples>

<instructions> <best_practices> 1. **Complement, Don't Replace**: This tool complements code-style rules, doesn't replace them 2. **Configurable Rules**: Allow teams to customize validation rules 3. **Auto-fix When Possible**: Provide auto-fix suggestions for common issues 4. **Fast Feedback**: Provide instant feedback during development 5. **Clear Messages**: Show clear error messages with line numbers and suggestions </best_practices> </instructions>

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS use AST-based validation over regex — regex-based style checking breaks on multi-line constructs, comments, and strings; AST-based tools (ESLint, Prettier) are format-independent and semantically accurate.
  2. ALWAYS check for existing ESLint/Prettier rules before writing custom ones — custom rules are expensive to maintain; 95% of style needs are covered by existing rules with configuration.
  3. NEVER block commits for style warnings, only errors — warnings are informational; blocking CI on warnings creates friction that leads teams to disable style checks entirely.
  4. ALWAYS provide auto-fix suggestions alongside findings — reports without auto-fix require manual intervention for each issue; auto-fixable violations have near-100% resolution rates vs 30% for manual.
  5. ALWAYS run style validation in both pre-commit hooks and CI — pre-commit catches issues locally before they reach the repository; CI catches cases where hooks were bypassed or aren't installed.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Regex-based style checkingBreaks on multi-line, strings, and commentsUse AST-based tools (ESLint, Prettier)
Custom rules for covered standardsHigh maintenance; inconsistent with communityConfigure existing ESLint/Prettier rules first
Blocking CI on warningsExcessive friction causes teams to disable style checksBlock only on errors; log warnings
Style validation without auto-fixManual fixes have low resolution rateAlways provide auto-fix commands alongside findings
Running only locally, not in CIDevelopers bypass pre-commit hooks regularlyRun in both pre-commit and CI pipeline

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

oimiragieo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する