Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data processing expert including parsing, transformation, and validation
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
dvc to manage data preprocessing and ensure reproducibility.When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Trusting API responses without validation | API schemas change silently; unvalidated data causes downstream type errors | Validate all responses with Zod/Pydantic schemas at the API boundary |
fs.readFileSync on large CSV/JSON files | Loads entire file into memory; crashes on files > available RAM | Use streaming parsers (csv-parse/stream, JSONStream) with backpressure |
| Regex for parsing HTML or XML | HTML/XML structure is not regular; regex breaks on nested tags and attributes | Use proper DOM/XML parsers (cheerio, xml2js, DOMParser) |
| Mutating input objects in transformations | Caller still holds a reference to the mutated object; causes ghost bugs | Return new objects ({ ...input, newField }) instead of mutating |
| Logging full request/response bodies with PII | PII ends up in log aggregators readable by non-authorized users | Redact PII fields before logging; log schemas and IDs only |
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。