Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect missing docs, undocumented files, project health issues, and coverage gaps on session start or on-demand. Scans for README gaps, TODO/FIXME counts, and test coverage holes.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This skill performs a structured health-check scan on session start (or on-demand) to surface:
Use this skill before beginning any significant work in an unfamiliar codebase, or as a recurring quality gate.
NO HEALTH REPORT WITHOUT EVIDENCE — EVERY FINDING MUST CITE FILE AND LINE
Never report a gap without a concrete file path and (when applicable) line number. Vague summaries are not actionable.
Command:
# Find source files without a README at their directory level
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.cjs" -o -name "*.mjs" -o -name "*.py" \) \
! -path "*/node_modules/*" ! -path "*/.git/*" ! -path "*/dist/*" ! -path "*/build/*" \
-print | while read f; do
dir=$(dirname "$f")
if [ ! -f "$dir/README.md" ] && [ ! -f "$dir/index.md" ]; then
echo "NO_README: $f"
fi
done | sort -u
Expected output: Lines of form NO_README: ./src/utils/helper.ts
Verify: Exit code 0; non-empty output means gaps exist.
Command:
# Find source files that have no matching test file
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.cjs" \) \
! -path "*/node_modules/*" ! -path "*/.git/*" ! -path "*/dist/*" \
! -path "*/tests/*" ! -path "*/__tests__/*" ! -path "*.test.*" ! -path "*.spec.*" \
-print | while read src; do
base=$(basename "$src" | sed 's/\.[^.]*$//')
dir=$(dirname "$src")
if ! find . -path "*/tests/*" -name "${base}.test.*" 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
if ! find . -name "${base}.test.*" 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
echo "NO_TEST: $src"
fi
fi
done
Expected output: Lines of form NO_TEST: ./src/auth/jwt.ts
Verify: Exit code 0; any NO_TEST lines are coverage gaps.
Command:
grep -rn --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.cjs" --include="*.mjs" --include="*.py" \
-E "(TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX):" \
--exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git --exclude-dir=dist \
. 2>/dev/null | sort
Expected output: ./src/auth/jwt.ts:42: // TODO: add token rotation
Verify: Total count printed via | wc -l appended to output.
Command:
# Find exported functions/classes without JSDoc or inline comment above them
grep -rn --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" -E "^export (function|class|const|async function)" \
--exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=dist --exclude-dir=.git \
. 2>/dev/null | while IFS=: read file line content; do
prevline=$((line - 1))
comment=$(sed -n "${prevline}p" "$file" 2>/dev/null | grep -E "(/\*|\*/|//)" || true)
if [ -z "$comment" ]; then
echo "NO_DOC: $file:$line $content"
fi
done
Expected output: NO_DOC: ./src/api/router.ts:15 export function handleRequest
Verify: Exit code 0.
After running Steps 1–4, produce a structured report with:
src/auth/, add tests for jwt.ts")Report format:
## Gap Detection Report — {{date}}
| Category | Count |
| ---------- | ----- |
| NO_README | {{n}} |
| NO_TEST | {{n}} |
| TODO/FIXME | {{n}} |
| NO_DOC | {{n}} |
### Priority Gaps
1. {{file:line}} — {{reason}}
...
### Recommended Actions
- [ ] {{action}}
...
Verify: Report written to .claude/context/tmp/gap-detection-report-{{date}}.md.
Input validated against schemas/input.schema.json before execution.
Output contract defined in schemas/output.schema.json.
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md for prior gap scans and known chronic issues.
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md with date and repo path.claude/context/memory/issues.mdnode_modules/, dist/, .git/ directoriesproactive-audit — broader audit including hook syntax and agent consistencytdd — use after gap-detection to address test coverage gapsdebugging — follow-up for runtime gaps identified during scancontext-compressor — compress large gap reports before handing offdeveloper (primary — runs on feature work)qa (primary — runs before test strategy)architect (supporting — runs before architecture reviews)planner (supporting — runs before planning sessions)まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。