Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GraphQL expert including schema design, Apollo Client/Server, and caching
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| No query depth/complexity limits | Single deeply-nested query can DoS the server | Configure graphql-depth-limit and graphql-query-complexity middleware |
| Introspection enabled in production | Exposes full schema to attackers; aids targeted exploitation | Disable via introspection: false in Apollo Server config for production |
| N+1 resolver queries | Each list item triggers separate DB query; 100 users = 100 queries | Use DataLoader to batch and deduplicate DB fetches per request |
| Authorization only in schema directives | Directives can be bypassed by aliasing fields or crafting custom queries | Check permissions inside every resolver; use context for user/role |
| Offset-based pagination | Inconsistent pages when data changes; O(n) scan at large offsets | Use cursor-based pagination with first, after, and opaque cursor tokens |
This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。