Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit memory retrieval quality (drift, staleness, citation-groundedness) and produce remediation backlog.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Audit the memory system as a unified retrieval layer (STM/MTM/LTM files + index + spawn citation outcomes).
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Auditing without a baseline | Cannot distinguish regression from steady-state; all findings are ambiguous | Snapshot current metrics at session start; compute delta against the previous run |
| Closing findings without re-check | Produces false-positive resolution; degradation persists silently behind green metrics | Re-run the specific retrieval query after each remediation; close only on confirmed green metric |
| Skipping citation groundedness | Citation failures are the leading cause of agent hallucination; missing this check omits the highest-severity defect class | Include citation_coverage and grounded_ratio metrics in every audit report |
| Full-mode audit on every spawn | Full audit is expensive; running it unconditionally inflates cost and slows workflows | Use --mode summary for routine checks; reserve --mode full for scheduled or triggered audits |
| Auditing STM only | MTM/LTM corruption is invisible in STM-only scans; stale LTM entries contaminate future sessions | Sample all three tiers: STM (current session), MTM (last 10 sessions), LTM (permanent summaries) |
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。