本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

memory-quality-auditor

Audit memory retrieval quality (drift, staleness, citation-groundedness) and produce remediation backlog.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • commands/memory-quality-auditor.md122 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs322 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs439 B
  • references/research-requirements.md400 B
  • rules/memory-quality-auditor.md297 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json582 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json266 B
  • scripts/main.cjs3.9 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md196 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Memory Quality Auditor

Audit the memory system as a unified retrieval layer (STM/MTM/LTM files + index + spawn citation outcomes).

Scope

  • Retrieval drift signals
  • stale memory ratio
  • evidence injection coverage
  • citation usage/groundedness continuity

Workflow

  1. Read memory artifacts and latest eval reports.
  2. Compute quality metrics and threshold status.
  3. Emit remediation backlog with TDD checks.
  4. Record findings in memory and optional evolution recommendation.

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS establish a baseline metric snapshot before auditing — drift is only meaningful relative to a prior measurement; auditing without a baseline produces absolute numbers that cannot identify regression.
  2. NEVER close a memory finding without re-running the affected retrieval query — closing without verification creates false improvement metrics and masks persistent degradation.
  3. ALWAYS include citation-groundedness checks in every audit run — uncited memory injections are the primary source of hallucination in agent spawns; skipping this check leaves the highest-risk failure mode undetected.
  4. NEVER audit only the STM tier — degradation often originates in MTM/LTM promotion corruption; all three tiers must be sampled in every full audit cycle.
  5. ALWAYS emit TDD-ready remediation items with a failing-test condition and expected metric threshold — vague findings ("memory quality is low") cannot be actioned by any agent.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Auditing without a baselineCannot distinguish regression from steady-state; all findings are ambiguousSnapshot current metrics at session start; compute delta against the previous run
Closing findings without re-checkProduces false-positive resolution; degradation persists silently behind green metricsRe-run the specific retrieval query after each remediation; close only on confirmed green metric
Skipping citation groundednessCitation failures are the leading cause of agent hallucination; missing this check omits the highest-severity defect classInclude citation_coverage and grounded_ratio metrics in every audit report
Full-mode audit on every spawnFull audit is expensive; running it unconditionally inflates cost and slows workflowsUse --mode summary for routine checks; reserve --mode full for scheduled or triggered audits
Auditing STM onlyMTM/LTM corruption is invisible in STM-only scans; stale LTM entries contaminate future sessionsSample all three tiers: STM (current session), MTM (last 10 sessions), LTM (permanent summaries)

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern → .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found → .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made → .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

oimiragieo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する