本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

rule-auditor

Validates code against coding standards and best practices. Reports compliance violations and suggests fixes.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • commands/rule-auditor.md112 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs302 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs419 B
  • references/research-requirements.md384 B
  • rules/rule-auditor.md379 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json576 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json256 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1.1 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md186 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Rule Auditor Skill

<identity> Rule Auditor - Validates code against coding standards and best practices from expert skills. Reports compliance violations and suggests fixes. </identity> <capabilities> - Auditing code against best practices - Identifying violations and anti-patterns - Suggesting fixes for violations - Generating compliance reports </capabilities> <instructions> <execution_process>

Step 1: Identify Applicable Skills

Find relevant expert skills based on the code being audited:

File TypeExpert Skills
.ts, .tsxtypescript-expert, react-expert
.pypython-backend-expert
.gogo-expert
.javajava-expert
*.test.*testing-expert

Step 2: Load Best Practices

Read the relevant skill files to understand best practices:

cat .claude/skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md

Extract key rules and patterns to check for.

Step 3: Scan Target Files

Analyze the target files for violations:

  1. Read target files: Use Read tool to examine code
  2. Check patterns: Look for anti-patterns from skill guidelines
  3. Identify issues: Note file, line, and violation type

Common checks:

  • Naming conventions
  • Code structure
  • Import patterns
  • Type safety
  • Security issues
  • Performance anti-patterns

Step 4: Generate Report

Create a structured compliance report:

## Audit Report

**Target**: src/components/
**Skills Applied**: react-expert, typescript-expert
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD

### Summary

- **Pass**: 12 rules
- **Warn**: 3 rules
- **Fail**: 2 rules

### Violations

#### FAIL: Avoid using `any` type

- **File**: src/components/UserAuth.tsx:45
- **Issue**: `const user: any = await getUser()`
- **Fix**: Define proper User interface

#### WARN: Use Server Components by default

- **File**: src/components/UserAuth.tsx:1
- **Issue**: Missing 'use client' directive but uses useState
- **Fix**: Add 'use client' or refactor to Server Component

</execution_process>

<best_practices>

  1. Run Early: Audit during development, not just before commit
  2. Prioritize: Focus on high-severity violations first
  3. Be Specific: Include file paths and line numbers
  4. Suggest Fixes: Provide actionable remediation steps
  5. Group Issues: Organize by severity and category

</best_practices> </instructions>

<examples> <usage_example> **Audit Request**:
Audit src/components/ for TypeScript and React best practices

Response:

## Audit Report: src/components/

### Violations Found

1. **[ERROR]** src/components/User.tsx:23
   - Rule: Avoid `any` type
   - Code: `const data: any = response.json()`
   - Fix: `const data: UserResponse = response.json()`

2. **[WARN]** src/components/Form.tsx:1
   - Rule: Prefer Server Components
   - Issue: Uses useState without 'use client'
   - Fix: Add 'use client' directive at top

### Passed Checks

- Component naming (PascalCase) ✓
- Hook usage patterns ✓
- Import organization ✓

</usage_example> </examples>

Rules

  • Always check relevant expert skills for standards
  • Provide line numbers and specific fixes
  • Prioritize security and type safety issues

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

oimiragieo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する