Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent swarm coordination patterns. Orchestrates parallel agent execution, manages agent communication, handles task distribution, and coordinates results aggregation.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Identify parallelizable work:
| Pattern | Example | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Independent tasks | Review multiple files | Spawn in parallel |
| Dependent tasks | Design → Implement | Sequential spawn |
| Fan-out/Fan-in | Multiple reviews → Consolidate | Parallel + Aggregation |
| Pipeline | Parse → Transform → Validate | Sequential handoff |
Use the Task tool to spawn multiple agents in a single message:
// Spawn multiple agents in ONE message for parallel execution
Task({
task_id: 'task-1',
subagent_type: 'general-purpose',
description: 'Architect reviewing design',
prompt: 'Review architecture...',
});
Task({
task_id: 'task-2',
subagent_type: 'general-purpose',
description: 'Security reviewing design',
prompt: 'Review security...',
});
Key: Both Task calls must be in the SAME message for true parallelism.
Use structured formats for agent communication:
## Agent Handoff: [Source] → [Target]
### Context
- Task: [What was done]
- Files: [Files touched]
### Findings
- [Key finding 1]
- [Key finding 2]
### Recommendations
- [Action item 1]
- [Action item 2]
### Artifacts
- [Path to artifact 1]
- [Path to artifact 2]
Combine outputs from parallel agents:
## Swarm Results Aggregation
### Participating Agents
- Architect: Completed ✅
- Security: Completed ✅
- DevOps: Completed ✅
### Consensus Points
- [Point all agents agree on]
### Conflicts
- [Point agents disagree on]
- Resolution: [How to resolve]
### Combined Recommendations
1. [Prioritized recommendation]
2. [Prioritized recommendation]
Strategies for partial failures:
| Scenario | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Agent timeout | Retry with simpler prompt |
| Agent error | Continue with available results |
| Conflicting results | Use consensus-voting skill |
| Missing critical result | Block and retry |
</execution_process>
<best_practices>
</best_practices> </instructions>
<examples> <usage_example> **Parallel Review Request**:Get architecture, security, and performance reviews for the new API design
Swarm Coordination:
// Spawn 3 reviewers in parallel (single message)
Task({ task_id: 'task-3', description: 'Architect reviewing API', prompt: '...' });
Task({ task_id: 'task-4', description: 'Security reviewing API', prompt: '...' });
Task({ task_id: 'task-5', description: 'Performance reviewing API', prompt: '...' });
Aggregated Results:
## API Design Review (3 agents)
### Consensus
- RESTful design is appropriate
- Need authentication on all endpoints
### Recommendations by Priority
1. [HIGH] Add rate limiting (Security)
2. [HIGH] Use connection pooling (Performance)
3. [MED] Add versioning to URLs (Architect)
</usage_example> </examples>
This skill has a corresponding workflow for complex multi-agent scenarios:
.claude/workflows/enterprise/swarm-coordination-skill-workflow.mdThis skill powers multi-agent orchestration patterns across the framework:
Router Decision: .claude/workflows/core/router-decision.md
Artifact Lifecycle: .claude/workflows/core/skill-lifecycle.md
Related Workflows:
consensus-voting skill for resolving conflicting agent outputscontext-compressor skill for aggregating parallel results.claude/workflows/enterprise/ use swarm patterns| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential spawning | No parallelism; swarm executes like a queue | Spawn all independent workers in a single message |
| Cross-worker communication | O(N²) coordination chaos | All worker-to-worker communication flows through the Queen |
| No failure handling | One worker crash stalls the swarm | Detect hung/failed workers and re-spawn with fresh state |
| Unbounded parallelism | Coordination overhead exceeds speedup beyond 7 workers | Limit to 5-7 workers per fan-out for optimal throughput |
| Free-form worker reports | Cannot aggregate results programmatically | Require all workers to use the structured handoff template |
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。